🧵 #Jan6Justice revealed the conspiracy to overturn our 2020 election. And news about more Trumpist crimes just keeps coming.
They violate our highest ideals. These are the #CrimesOfTeamCoup. #GMW4U
https://t.co/NN2a0diDdr
Please take a listen to Jessica Craven. And take some action today. There is no doubt that we are now in a constitutional crisis brought on by Trump's flouting of the Supreme Court, the rule of law, and our Constitution.
https://t.co/nEBwNg7Ul1
In a new interview, Donald Trump is asked by Sharyl Attkisson what specifically he would do to bring down prices if elected president.
Here is his full response 👇
Project 2025 is the fever dream of reactionary MAGAs who think only they are suited to hold power in America. They their first steps ( Dobbs) have set us back 50 years. They want to go back to the 1950s, then 1920, then the 1850s.
Trump’s Project 2025 leader: I am surprised by the scope of the vitriol toward Project 2025. The lesson I’ve learned is we are going to keep doing this. We are going to punch Democrats in the nose
Sen. Ossoff: “What we’ve heard from OBGYNs in these hearings is that, first of all, OBGYNs are deterred from training and practicing in Georgia by the threat of criminal prosecution, worsening our state’s OBGYN shortage. Second of all, this law is putting women’s lives at risk.”
I remember when reporters said Biden should answer hard questions to convince voters he's still got it, then after he did (at the NATO summit), reporters said, sure, OK, but answering hard questions probably won't convince voters.
@mmpadellan She is continuing to get better and better at this. I mean, she was a good orator in 2020, but she has absolutely hit her stride. Strong, empathetic, and sharp. She sounds like the leader this country needs.
🚨 NEW from @VP@KamalaHarris:
"@POTUS & I strongly believe that the American people must have confidence in the Supreme Court.
That is why @POTUS and I are calling on Congress to pass important reforms – from imposing term limits for Justices’ active service, to requiring Justices to comply with binding ethics rules just like every other federal judge. And finally, in our democracy, no one should be above the law. So we must also ensure that no former President has immunity for crimes committed while in the White House."
A 🧵about this election, in historical context:
I’m under no illusions: a significant minority of our citizens are desperately unhappy with our system of government and our inclusive values of equality and justice for all. They make it plain, and I get it.
I know at least one Republican woman planning on using her vote to secretly cancel out her husband’s vote for a convicted felon serial rapist who wants to ban abortion nationwide.
Don’t forget, the ballot is secret for a reason.
cc @HaleyVte4Harris
This is ridiculous. Harris is going to be the nominee because EVERYONE WANTS HER TO BE THE NOMINEE.
Our data point: we pre-polled Indivisible leaders on what to do if Biden dropped out. 95% said we should back Harris.
It's easy to move fast when you've got overwhelming support.
This is some ace pro-democracy work Jessica. Appreciate the effort.
Project 2025 is how they get the power to enact their unconstitutional Agenda 47 plans like eliminating the entire Dept of Ed. They are related!
I used to be so grateful having been born female in this country at the time I was-feeling it was the best time/place to be a woman in history, despite ongoing inequality & vulnerability. Now that advantage is eroding-seeing men discussing taking away our right to vote, & other fundamental rights
Third, If Harris were at the top of the ticket, perhaps the media would finally focus on Trump’s deteriorating mental acuity and personality defects (as I have pointed out) with proper urgency.
Second, the issues that should be at the center of the Democrats’ campaign — abortion, a tyrannical Supreme Court, and the manifest unfitness of felon and former president Donald Trump — are right in her wheelhouse. She has been the administration’s leading voice in attacking Dobbs as an assault on freedom and privacy. Her legal background provides authority and skill to explain the excesses of an unhinged Supreme Court. And as I have argued, she is as effective on the attack against Trump as any Democrat. (And yes, running against a Black woman would infuriate him.)