Instead of outraging on a quarter of a million women being groomed and gang raped in Britain, these psychopaths at the @BBCNews, who admitted to evading tax in India, are instead outraging on one woman who claims she contracted a disease 19 years ago after her visit to India.
Dear Dharmendra Uncle,
@dpradhanbjp
Happy Birthday. You turn 57 today. We couldn't even reach half your age.
Yours,
Late Ritik Mishra
Late Anshika Pandey
Late Bhagyashree
Late Umesh Mali
Late Riya Kumari Thapa
Late Anukeerthana
Late Rima Begum
Late Siddharth Hegde
Late Pradeep Meghwal
Late Shivani Yadav
Late Renu Meena
Late Akansha
Late Kahan Patel
Late Maithili Sonwane
रत्ती भर भी लज्जा नहीं आई ये ट्वीट लिखते हुए? कब तक इस पतित को बचाते रहोगे? कौन सी विवशता है सिवाय इस ईगो बैटल के कि जनता के दवाब में तो नहीं हटाऊँगा?
समाज में इस व्यक्ति को ले कर जो भाव हैं, और @narendramodi का जो यह इंडोर्समेंट है, वह बताता है कि इस सरकार ने शिक्षा को अपनी अंतिम प्राथमिकता बना रखा है।
Youth are anti-establishment by nature. It's basic science. Youth naturally gravitates toward rebellion because questioning existing structures becomes part of forming an independent identity.
The urge is less about detailed policy content and more about belonging, purpose, and feeling part of something larger than oneself. That is why generations repeatedly rally around symbols, slogans, and movements that become culturally "the thing" of their era.
Sometimes the cause is deeply thought through; sometimes it is romanticized and simplified. Figures like Che Guevara became global youth icons not because millions had carefully studied revolutionary economics or Latin American history, but because rebellion itself carries emotional appeal. A poster, a slogan, and a sense of standing against "the system" can become an identity.
That is why they tend to appropriate anything they feel can bring change, whether it is a song (e.g., Sadda Haq, ethe rakh), a movie (e.g., Rang De Basanti), a T-shirt (e.g., Che Guevara or Bob Marley), a singer (e.g., Sidhu Moosewala), a TV ad (e.g., Tata Tea Jaago Re), or a movement (e.g., India Against Corruption). This cockroach thing is the same. They feel it is going to bring some change.
They are in for disappointment and will soon lose interest after realizing that it is not a real movement, but just another page with the same propaganda posts they already see on other pages of a similar nature.
In defense of Indian 🇮🇳 democracy!
During Prime Minister Narendra Modi most successful visit to Norway a minor incident happened. A Norwegian journalist demanded that the prime minister starts holding press conferences. She claimed that Indian democracy is in bad shape.
May be its time to pause? May be its time to be a bit curious to the world’s largest democracy?
Two weeks ago five Indian states and territories held elections. The turn out in the battlefield state of West Bengal was 94%. In the last local election in Norway it was 62%, in many European local elections turn out is below 50%. Can voting in massive numbers be a signal Indians trust their democratic process?
In the same election BJP won big in Assam and West Bengal. It lost even bigger in Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Can this diversity be a signal that Indian democracy is reflecting the will of the people?
The journalist referred to a democracy ranking putting India at 157 in the world, behind many dictatorships and deeply troubled states. When a ranking is so obviously contrary to common sense, why not ask critical questions to those making the ranking rather than demand that leaders shall comment on nonsense? I recommend Salvatore Babones book “Dharma democracy”. The book debunks convincingly the flawed methodology of these rankings.
It was referred to a ranking claiming it’s very dangerous to be a journalist in India. Reality is that it is more dangerous to be journalist in the US and far more dangerous in the vast majority of other nations in the world.
Let’s be real. India is not perfect. Of course there are incidents. India has a population the size of North America, South America and Europe combined. But India is much more peaceful than Europe or the Americas. That’s remarkable - given the ethnic, language and religious diversity of India and the many development challenges.
Unless we consider democracy a form of government only suited for some very small, peaceful and homogeneous Western European nations, may be we should commend Indian democracy?
India is the only major former UK colony which became and has remained a democracy. Its sometimes claimed that the Brits taught India democracy. If that was the case why isn’t Myanmar or Pakistan or the Gulf kingdoms democracies??? Reality is that Indian democracy is both homegrown and extraordinary successful.