The Informed Parent

The Informed Parent encourages the public to look into the highly questionable procedure #vaccination which stands upon very questionable foundational 'science'

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

Vaccine-induced herd immunity is scientifically impossible https://t.co/FcW8y6f5JT via @wordpressdotcom

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

I hope my conversation with Charles Malet, UK Column News will be useful for you to listen to
https://t.co/t4xmxsRmuu

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

Well worth taking the time to hear this very interesting conversation https://t.co/WLKnXjfbeV

[Nick Hudson @NickHudsonCT]

That there was a novel virus was a lie, let alone a deadly one. No lab leak, no pandemic, no Made in China. There was an intelligence community and DoD infowar, waged for the purpose of expropriating trillions and advancing surveillance state socialism. This is all easily verified. Failing to call it out constitutes gatekeeping the pandemic preparedness narrative, but worst of all is that it obscures a truth that the world most needs to grasp if humans are ever to flourish again.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

[Andrew Kaufman MD @AndrewKaufmanMD]

Health headlines are often designed to control the conversation. The reality is that every decision you make for yourself and your family is personal and should not be dictated by the government. No treatment should be mandated, and no option should be restricted.

You have agency over your health. You should be free to choose the treatments you believe are best for you, based on your own values, research, and circumstances—without coercion or interference.

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

@ABridgen And they also have no properly conducted scientific evidence of pathogenic and infectious nano particles they claim are viruses!

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

@westonaprice Great to be invited to talk about The Informed Parent and how my ongoing research on vaccination started back in 1991. Thank you Hilda and Wise Traditions/Weston A Price Foundation!!
https://t.co/elak9N0w1h

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

https://t.co/ZIedjtzJbI

[Andrew Kaufman MD @AndrewKaufmanMD]

The smartest way to control a debate is to frame the wrong question. That is exactly what is happening with the vaccine conversation. We argue about whether they are safe or effective, while the real questions are being ignored: their legitimacy and why we are being told to vaccinate against something that has never been proven to exist.

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

@TheChiefNerd Beanie, Vaccine facts? They only work in damaging the health of the recipients to varying degrees, and sometimes they prove fatal. Why? They are based on false foundations. The vaccine era must end!

[D. Alec Zeck @Alec_Zeck]

There are some parents who—no matter what is shown to them now or in the future—will never accept that vaccines are entirely unnecessary, poisonous products that only carry the potential for harm.

They simply cannot cope with the reality that they trusted “the experts” and allowed dozens upon dozens of neurotoxin-containing shots—manufactured by habitually criminal organizations that carry zero liability and profit from lifelong illness—to be injected into their children.

For some, that truth is too painful to confront. So instead, they choose to keep believing in a devastating lie.

[Champagne Joshi @JoshWalkos]

The unpublished Henry Ford study is explosive in its implications. At its core, the data reveal a stark divide between children who received vaccines and those who did not. When measured in incidence rates per one million patient-years, the differences are not subtle. They are dramatic, and they cut across a wide spectrum of chronic conditions.

The most basic finding is that vaccinated children experienced nearly two and a half times the overall rate of chronic health conditions compared to their unvaccinated peers. The number sits at 277.3 cases per million patient-years among vaccinated children against 111.7 for the unvaccinated, producing an incidence rate ratio of 2.48 with tight confidence intervals. That is not a minor signal, it is a flashing red light.

Asthma stands out as one of the most glaring disparities. The rate was over four times higher in vaccinated children, 145.6 cases compared to only 35.6 among the unvaccinated. Atopic diseases such as eczema and allergies were also elevated, with vaccinated children facing a 2.64-fold higher risk. Autoimmune conditions were even more striking, with vaccinated children showing an incidence more than six times greater than their unvaccinated counterparts.

Neurodevelopmental outcomes were perhaps the most disturbing category. Disorders in this group were more than six times higher in vaccinated children. ADHD was present in 262 cases among the vaccinated group, yet zero among the unvaccinated. Learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, and other developmental impairments all followed a similar pattern. Speech disorders were four times higher among the vaccinated group, and developmental delays nearly four times higher as well. Mental health disorders overall were 3.5 times higher. Even seizure disorders, while less dramatic, still trended upwards with a relative risk of 1.63.

One of the most telling features of the data is how often the unvaccinated column registers as zero or near zero. ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and tics had no cases recorded in the unvaccinated population. Critics will argue this reflects underdiagnosis, since unvaccinated children typically see doctors less often. But the sheer size of the disparity suggests something more. A minor diagnostic gap might be plausible, but the gulf revealed in these numbers is difficult to dismiss as mere chance or office visit frequency.

Taken together, the Henry Ford analysis suggests vaccinated children are not only more likely to be seen by physicians but also genuinely more likely to be diagnosed with an array of chronic and developmental problems. Even if one accepts the possibility of detection bias, the magnitude of the differences requires serious investigation rather than casual dismissal. If the signal were a modest ten or twenty percent increase, one could argue it away. When the risks climb to four, five, or even six times higher, the argument of bias alone becomes increasingly fragile.

The larger point is this. Whether or not one accepts every conclusion of the Henry Ford team, this study provides a powerful signal that chronic conditions deserve a deeper look in relation to vaccination. Current post-marketing surveillance systems are primarily designed to catch rare acute events such as anaphylaxis or febrile seizures. They are not equipped to track long-term patterns in asthma, autoimmune disease, or developmental disorders. By design, they will not see what this study has begun to uncover.

To dismiss this analysis outright because it has not yet passed through peer review is an act of intellectual laziness. Publication is not the only measure of value, and in today’s climate researchers face professional punishment for producing findings that challenge the dominant narrative.

[Roman Bystrianyk @RBystrianyk]

What if everything you've been told about the greatest medical triumph of the 20th century is incomplete?
The historical mortality charts reveal a shocking truth: diseases like measles and whooping cough had already seen a 95-99% decline in deaths LONG before their vaccines were introduced.
So, what caused the collapse of infectious diseases?
The data points not to the needle, but to a silent revolution in sanitation, nutrition, and living standards—the true unsung heroes of public health.
This isn't just history; it's a fundamental challenge to a deeply held medical dogma.
Read the full investigation that connects the dots the mainstream narrative ignores.
The Greatest Health Revolution: https://t.co/459PCTxNNF

[Dr. Ben Tapper @DrBenTapper1]

If I told you that my CHILD was injured
in a car accident,
you would be compassionate and worried. If I told you it was because the BRAKES FAILED, you would be shocked and appalled. If I told you I found out the manufacturer decided not to bother testing the brakes,
you would be mad and tell me to SUE. If I told you I found over 60 studies showing they knew they would fail and opted instead to cover it up,
your HEAD WOULD SPIN. If I further told you that: The government KNEW ALL ALONG ABOUT THE DANGERS; that laws were passed to PREVENT ANYONE FROM SUING the manufacturers; that there were HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of
killed/injured CHILDREN, you would be beyond yourself trying to work out how to help these kids.
But replace the word CAR with the word VACCINE and you would run a mile. Why?
Think about it because this is the truth. Millions of parents are fighting each day JUST TO BE HEARD. The evidence is beyond question. Vaccines are not properly tested and hundreds of studies show the connection between vaccines and serious injuries, including seizures, neurological damage, Guillain Barre Syndrome and Death. This is besides the high rate of life- threatening allergies, asthma, cancer and
chronic ailments amongst vaccinated children. Where are the recalls? Where is the demand for answers? Where is the public outrage? The alternative
media is the only place where this information can be found because the truth is being suppressed.
So are you going to continue ignoring the warnings and the truth until YOUR child is injured or killed?
EDUCATE BEFORE YOU VACCINATE

[ViroLIEgy @ViroLIEgy]

Koch’s Postulates were meant to establish a scientific foundation for linking microbes to disease. That foundation failed. The germ "theory" couldn’t satisfy the postulates—so the “virus” was invented to bypass the postulates and preserve the illusion.

[Roman Bystrianyk @RBystrianyk]

Is much of what you believe not based on actual science?

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

Talking about The Informed Parent
https://t.co/ZMXSJFCTTT

[Dr. Tom Cowan @drtomcowan]

Webinar from June 25th, 2025
Tom talks about how visionary biologist Jeff Green critiques the no-virus position.
#drtomcowan

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

"We Have Been Conditioned To Believe That Vaccines Are Safe, Effective, Necessary & Harmless...They Are None Of Those Things."

"Vaccines Are Systematic Poisoning Of Children & Adults."

"It's Time We Call It What It Is...The Pediatric Poisoning Schedule."
Dr Sherri Tenpenny, DO

If a child, by the time they are 18, gets all of the vaccines in the entire 72 dose schedule, they get 13,000 mcg of Aluminum, 600 mcg of Mercury & 200 toxic chemicals injected directly into their system.

Each 'well child' appointment can involve up to 8 shots for the vulnerable infant involving 100s of ingredients such as:

Polysorbate 80
Thimerosal Mercury
Aluminum
Formaldehyde
M59 Squalene
Acetone
Sodium Borate (Borax)
2-Phenoxyethanol
SV40
Triton X-100
Bovine Calf Serum
Poultry Serum
Poultry Byproducts

The vaccine industry is built on the use of aborted babies organs to produce the vaccines we use today…and they have to replace these lines with current aborted organs.

The most recent harvested human organ for vaccine research is WALVAX-2 which is a harvested lung from a 3 month old unborn baby taken in 2015. This was one baby of 10 in total, in which organs were harvested for research & vaccine development.

Take a look ⬇️ these are the 'code names' for harvested organs used to make vaccines, their original source & what vaccines they are used in:

HEK-293: Human Embryo Kidney, aborted female; used in development of Ebola & Covid

MRC-5: Human Lung, 14 week old aborted male; used in Polio, Rabies, Chickenpox, Hep A & Shingles

WI-38: Human Lung, 12 week old aborted female; used in Polio, Rabies, Chickenpox, Hep A & Shingles

RA 27-3: Human Kidney, 6 weeks old, used in the Rubella & MMR

PER-C6: Human Retina, 18 weeks old, used in the development of Ebola & Covid

IMR-90: Lung from a 16 week old fetus; to replace the WI-38 line

WALVAX-2: Lung from a 3 month old fetus; to replace the WI-38 and MRC-5 line

Animal Organs Used To Make Vaccines:

MDCK: Madin Darby Canine Kidney, female Cocker Spaniel

VERO: African Green Monkey Kidney

FRHL: Fetal Rhesus Monkey Lung

CHO: Chinese Hamster Ovary

PK-15: Pork Kidney

RK-13: Rabbit Kidney

SIRC: Rabbit Cornea

👇2015 Organs Harvested For WALVAX-2👇
https://t.co/nOl5Mq5ts1
👇Human Fetal Tissue & Organ Trafficking👇
https://t.co/ndVorJpRLU
👇Vaccine Excipient Summary List👇
https://t.co/TBuG7o3Olt

Speaker: @BusyDrT

[The Informed Parent @informedparent_]

The Untold History of Vaccination
https://t.co/0ja1izTolO