InfToE

Information Theory of Everything

[InfToE @inftoe]

👇 (thread of threads)

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Hope we're not just the biological boot loader for digital superintelligence. Unfortunately, that is increasingly probable

[InfToE @inftoe]

@Shaun_Fosmark I agree, it's difficult to grasp the essence of the idea from a short statement. But if the idea is that a particle is some kind of energy cycle, then that's also not true: energy is a higher-level concept than a particle.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@latestincosmos All normal matter falls in the accretion disk along the equator, while NASA falls along the meridian. Conclusion: NASA is abnormal.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@martinmbauer If we move from your general, unfounded, yet so optimistic hypothesis to specifics, everything falls apart. Only carbon, with its specific connectivity, can be the basis of life. It can only fulfill its function with a given set and values ​​of the universal constants.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@pickover A patent for a cat litter box?

[InfToE @inftoe]

A favorite trick of "theories" is to call the universe a part of it.
The universe is everything that exists. Not a phase of a cycle, but the entire cycle.
And the "theory" immediately ceases to do what it was invented for: explain why the universe exists.

[Night Sky Today @NightSkyToday]

🚨: The Cyclical Universe theory suggests that the universe endlessly dies and is reborn.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@Kekius_Sage Why manipulate a mirror, brain, or the names of hands. Simply trace the paths of photons from your body parts through the mirror to your eyes, and all the obscurities will become trivial.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@QuanticASI we have no use for AI, it won't merge with us. renaissance is cancelled.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@phaseshiftone @Shaun_Fosmark You just declared an obvious everyday truth that there is time (clocks) and space (distances). If to define reality some gzirmlen (hrlpronds) would be needed, you would declare it in the same obvious way. But nothing third is not here. Why?

[InfToE @inftoe]

@Shaun_Fosmark This is a strong indication that none of them have ToE.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@viladinur @kekius9 Beginning: the universe is only information and nothing more.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@kekius9 A good move, but not quite right. The concept of "nothing" is an artificial term, invented for communication purposes. It has no real representation. In reality, only that which is part of something exists. Nothing can't be part of something. Only what exists exists.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@NightSkyToday None of that. We are not alone. We are the only ones.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@latestincosmos This assertion contains an irresolvable internal contradiction.
Creation is an event in time. But if time exists, then it is not nothing.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@QuanticASI zero. causality is not probabilistic

[InfToE @inftoe]

@Shaun_Fosmark No. Either ToE complete, or it is not ToE.

[InfToE @inftoe]

@phaseshiftone @Shaun_Fosmark Test question. How does your Solid Universe Model justify why there are two of them - space and time? Why not three, or four, or one? Why exactly two?

[InfToE @inftoe]

@kekius9 This is a fitting of the problem—baryon asymmetry—to the answer: the observed existence of the universe. But baryon asymmetry is just a fragment of a more general (and far more impressive) problem of fine-tuning. Dig in that direction.