IB ⁷

[Netflix France @NetflixFR]

HAPPY JUNGKOOK DAY🎂

[IB ⁷ @Ingy913]

@foedwardsmartin Bts literaly are known for their perfomances- live vocals, rap , dance and presence … What type of bs are they falling for. If you tell them this they bring 30s compilation of them sick or ear piece not working which is prove itself that they sing live😂

[vai ver o bts ! @ikooquitto]

“eu nunca vou superar”
“seu ex?”
“não, esse vídeo do yoongi sorrindo”

[Jantar The Botman🪼 @Jantar127]

You spend time on Reddit calling Namjoon the worst person in the world, then show up at his concert in the front row wearing an “I love Namjoon” shirt, a Koya choker, and holding a banner for him. That isn’t just inconsistency. It’s a performance.

A lot of this is driven by the internet’s reward system. Outrage, pile-ons, and “hot takes” get attention. Calling someone out in a comment section can feel like taking a stand. It costs nothing and often earns approval from the people watching. Showing up in real life is different. The concert, the merch, the banner, the proximity those are harder to fake. When the same person who cursed him online is now sitting there asking him, in effect, to notice them, the earlier posture looks less like principle and more like content.

This isn’t new. Some people treat fandom as a stage for identity: they perform disgust when it scores points, then perform devotion when the lights are on and the person is actually there. The result is hypocrisy that is obvious to anyone paying attention. If the dislike were real and consistent, they wouldn’t be in the front row wearing his character around their neck. If the love were real and consistent, they wouldn’t be writing those posts.

The pattern is the same whether it’s one person or a repeating type: online they write as if they have nothing but contempt; in person they act as if they would lick the ground he walks on. That isn’t complexity. It’s two different audiences and two different incentives. One is for validation from strangers on a forum. The other is for the chance to be seen by the person they claimed to despise.

You don’t have to understand every motive to see the contradiction. People who do this aren’t making a coherent argument. They’re collecting reactions in one place and chasing proximity in another. That’s why it keeps happening, and why it still looks like the same cheap performance every time.

[isa @solmerv]

Me: Happy Birthday Jungkook-

World Music Awards:

[IB ⁷ @Ingy913]

@LottiesxWorld When we both where 17😂 for half a year we same age 😅

[IB ⁷ @Ingy913]

@smolchilliepee 😂😂😂what does whatever group this is and op listening them, have to do with bts and disbandment 😂😂😂bts mind they own business just making music and enjoying their life while zetaleth over here can’t stop thinking about them while listening other group. Filling that void😂

[AGUST D CHARTS @DataAgustD]

Yoongi really went from “there’s no way they’re playing Hip Hop Phile” to absolutely vibing his heart out seconds later 😭

denial → realization → pure happiness 😂

[𝐒𝐨𝐚𝐡⁷🥢𓊝 @Yoon_kookie97]

Dear RM, Jin, Agust D, j-hope, Jimin, V & Jungkook, thanks

[♡ @amlysbang]

The Recording Academy has once again started what looks like a desperate attempt at media play to save face.

First, they announced that they were reconsidering and revamping the Asian Pop category after BTS opted out. Then? Nothing. No actual changes, no concrete announcement, no explanation of what this “revamp” was supposed to look like. Submissions have now closed, and yet the category was allowed to move forward without the supposed changes we were told were coming. At this point, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the Academy wants to control the narrative more than it wants to address the actual criticism.

And now comes the media rehabilitation. Gold Derby published an article claiming that “K-pop fans in particular” saw the Asian Pop Performance category as a “consolation prize.” No. K-pop fans did not. ARMY did. And there is a very important distinction there. ARMY are the BTS fandom, and we have spent YEARS having to understand how the music industry works because we have had to deal with its categories, eligibility rules, language requirements, voting structures and everything else that surrounds BTS’s relationship with the Recording Academy or the industry in general. We know what we are looking at. We know why this category was created, how it was structured and why it was completely reasonable to question whether this was genuine representation or simply a way of placing Asian artists into a separate box.

What makes this article even more infuriating is the language used to describe BTS. It calls them the “prohibitive favorite” for this new category; understandable BUT then says that BTS “sided with aggrieved fans” and chose to boycott the Grammys altogether. Read that framing carefully. BTS are not being presented as artists who rejected being separated by geography and language. They are being presented as artists who listened to angry fans and walked away from an award they were supposedly guaranteed to win. That is an incredibly convenient way to rewrite what actually happened. It turns a legitimate institutional criticism into a story about supposedly unreasonable fans being upset because their favorite artists were not getting enough recognition. And I am sorry, but that is not neutral reporting. That is narrative management.

#ArtHasNoAliens

https://t.co/kTzI2xk1Qs

[did yoongi come home today? @didyoongicome]

lets all cry

[⁷ @Pk_bts_land]

According to CBC Globe, cultural philosopher Prof. Lee Ji-young calls BTS’s Grammys move a “postcolonial act”, BTS didn’t just reject an award; they questioned the entire Western gatekeeping system: “Who gave you the authority to evaluate us?” The “Asian fence” just got hit hard.

[gonnasinghbd2jk💜 @orul8ce]

Forbes article 👀👀👀 calling out Grammys bs category 🫩😒again must read 👀

So when the Recording Academy created a new category for Best Asian Pop Music Performance this June, and BTS answered by declining to submit any music for the 2027 awards, the institution lost the artist its new category seemed built to honor.🙄😒

The skeptical reading of BTS's refusal deserves to be taken seriously. The group's biggest single from ARIRANG, "SWIM," was recorded entirely in English and would not even qualify for the new category. BTS has spent a decade building a global brand that treats K-pop as an origin rather than a boundary, and saying no to the Grammys may cost the group very little while strengthening BTS's own brand considerably.👀👀

The skeptics are right about the price and wrong about the meaning. Walking away rarely creates leverage. What it does, reliably, is reveal how much leverage someone accumulated before entering the room. BTS remains fully visible after saying no; most artists could not make the same choice without disappearing, which is why almost no one else can afford the gesture. Refusal, it turns out, is an audit. It exposes how unequally artists depend on the institution being refused.

What BTS holds instead of a trophy is an audience, and that audience is more than evidence of popularity. It is an independent constituency. The Recording Academy can decide whether BTS receives an award but it cannot withdraw the attention, amplification, revenue and cultural standing that millions of people provide entirely outside the Academy's control.

The group represented South Korea as cultural envoys, named its comeback album after a traditional Korean folk song, and posted the refusal itself in Korean; the members declined the category in the language. The dispute is about authorship, not identity. BTS naming an album ARIRANG is self-definition. An American institution sorting pop by market geography and language is institutional classification. From the outside, both point at the same identity. The power relationship inside them is not the same.

BTS did not become powerful by refusing the Grammys. The group could refuse because it had spent years building relationships and cultural meaning that the Grammys could not award and therefore could not take back. That is the practical question this story offers anyone working inside an institution: if your title, access and internal endorsement disappeared tomorrow, what would still move with you?

None of this means walking away is always wise. Refusal can be theatrical, self-serving or strategically useful, and BTS's decision may be all three. The point is that only some people can make the gesture without becoming invisible, and that difference is what refusal exposes.
At the Met five years ago, RM spoke about artists the world had not discovered. Today BTS is powerful enough to decline discovery on someone else's terms. 🔥🔥🔥👏Recognition measures the institution's judgment. What you can afford to refuse measures how much of your authority belongs to you

https://t.co/WuBB7MYsK5

[gonnasinghbd2jk💜 @orul8ce]

FYI….👀👀👀 worth a read

It is time to break free from the Billboard and Grammy Awards, the two symbols of the American music industry that we have revered like sacred relics. Of course, reaching high chart positions and winning a Grammy is a gratifying experience, but is there really a need to obsess over them? Nor does the Grammy necessarily equate to honor and pride. For a long time, while the authority of the Grammys has been acknowledged, there has been strong public criticism regarding its awarding practices, which have been seen as leaning toward authoritarianism.

First of all, the awards have been stained by discrimination and exclusion. While favoring the songwriting style of Tin Pan Alley Pop established in the 1940s and 1950s, it has ignored new youth music like rock 'n' roll and hip-hop, as well as indie music. Elvis Presley, the King of Rock 'n' Roll whom they themselves worship as a national hero, was nominated 14 times during his prime in the 1950s and 1960s but never once lifted a trophy for music in that genre. It was not until 1968 that he received an award in the religious music category, which is practically considered a periphery. The Beatles were also underdogs of the Grammy Awards, and Elton John, like Elvis, only became a Grammy laureate belatedly in the 1990s . Legends such as Jimi Hendrix, Led Zeppelin, Queen, and David Bowie were rarely even nominated for a Grammy, receiving only "Lifetime Achievement Awards" after their disbandment or posthumously. Hip-hop artists and female singers also protested against the practice of being excluded from the main awards.

All that matters is music that is diligently crafted to enhance quality and that the artists enjoy. Isn't it enough if the music is truthful enough for people to see themselves in it and communicates with the times? Only by breaking away from the US and the Grammys will BTS be able to pursue music imbued with individuality and authenticity. Restoring their sense of self is the key. Music must come first as music for oneself, not for others.

https://t.co/KMsXM8miOJ

[miniboo 🐳🐱 ⁷ saw BTS ⦿ ☰ ☲ @jk_phoria]

Atp even Inkigayo feels more honest than these so called big western award shows. At least there, we have a scoreboard. Here, it's just vibes, sponsors, hidden rules and "trust us".

The bar is not on the floor anymore. It's underground.
#ArtHasNoAliens @RecordingAcad

[BTS ⊙⊝⊜ @ThePopBase]

.@vmas, I’d genuinely love to know what the criteria are for Artist of the Year nominations, because how are artists who underperformed this year or simply just released an album getting nominated, while BTS, who literally had the biggest album of 2026 and one of the biggest songs gets overlooked? Make it make sense. Who is paying you? 😭

[gonnasinghbd2jk💜 @orul8ce]

😂😂😂😂💀Gold Derby did a whole 180 💀💀 Went from “BTS can start practicing their acceptance speech” to “maybe the Grammys can kick the can on the Asian category, admit they messed up and hope BTS and the fans come back” 💀💀😂😂 my goated legends BTS only you could do this to Grammys🔥🔥🔥💜

From the article 😂😂👀
The simplest short-term solution to the Best Asian Pop Music Performance category controversy would be to say "Never mind!" Walk back the announcement, fall on the sword, and hope that a swift-ish response😒💀 to backlash is enough to bring some fans (and a certain group named BTS) back into the fold.🙄

At the moment, the Recording Academy has on their hands a new awards category that's been essentially invalidated by its top contender. The situation doesn't just hurt the Grammys, but also the potential victors. 😂😂😂😂If the Academy follows through with handing out Best Asian Pop Music Performance, the winner could be perceived as having an asterisk next to their win😂😂😂😂💀(they’ve been lurking on armytwt😂💀). Perhaps the most likely outcome for the category is a big pause button and a vague promise to fix it in the future... once the stakeholders are consulted

https://t.co/DPKP7IoftK

[Aynat⁷ | ᵛᵒᵗᵉ ᶠᵒʳ ᵇᵗˢ ⁺ ˢʷⁱᵐ ᶠᵒʳ ᵛᵐᵃˢ ⊙⊝⊜ @BTSkiNoona]

The @RecordingAcad issuing a statement so close to the deadline was nothing but damage control - a tactic to give media/artists the impression that they were genuinely deliberating, when they were just delaying

Scrap the category
Review all submissions as pop

#ArtHasNoAliens

[Key 🇲🇽 @jinnieskr]

No, se están yendo las que los idealizaron y llevaron al extremo su relación parasocial, las moralistas selectivas
Nos quedamos las que entendemos, las que nos estamos moviendo por ellos, las que vimos más allá de un error

[IB ⁷ @Ingy913]

@Catty_luv20 this is actually fake ragebait activism , its very much is an issue created out of non issue … week of bs and its stops by itself…i would say as an army since 2015 : 2016 was very hard because a lot of mayor stuff happened and we as fandom where small 2018 big and 2024 massive