ibs12345678

I hate the Internet.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@Fitz_FF Look into his drops in the second half of the season. I’m pretty sure they increased as the season went on. He dropped some big catches long and short.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@eric_nehm Fire Doc.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@KenIngalls CB if available or they trade up to get Amos, otherwise I feel like their board is: Scourton, Ezeiraku, Landon Jackson, Umanmielen, Burch at edge. TJ Sanders, Darius Alexander, Alfred Collins DT.

One of Amos, Umanmielen, Sanders, Collins most likely.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@jasonjwilde Take the trade. Get Amos at 33 or 34. Do iiiiitttt.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@rothchris Please. 33 and 67 from Cleveland. Amos or Revel at 33, Royals with 67. Umanmielen at 54. Send.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@BookOfEli_NFL I’d rather trade down to 32-34 and pick up a 3rd. Think one of Revel, Amos, or an Edge is still available there.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@BillHuberNFL I would prefer Cleveland’s 33 and 67 and not including 123. But I suppose that depends on Cleveland, too. And whether or not Dart falls past the Steelers.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting Except the raiders. They just google “best big board” the morning of the draft.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting Is PFF the best gauge of big board? While I think their talent assessments are better than the “big box” or fan consensus, they seem to deviate and end up wrong. End of the day no one knows how teams feel about individual players so it’s all a bit of a wash.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting That doesn’t seem like nearly enough.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting Where they are as a franchise, doesn’t this make the most sense? They are not a year away, but they could be two or three away with the right drafts.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting Every year the draft goes from “only 1 or 2 QBs with first round grades” to 4-5 QBs in the first round. As a Packer fan I encourage more teams to trade up for QBs.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting Come get Malik Willis. Higher ceiling, lower price tag (maybe?), less draft capital (probably?)

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@BookOfEli_NFL BOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@rotobuzzguy To be fair even the “bracketologists” brackets look like this by the end.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@nfldraftscout @Sam_Hubbard_ The way they kept landing Barron in mocks this is a relief to me. (As a Packer fan.)

[Melanie D'Arrigo @DarrigoMelanie]

These are called “bribes.”

The President of the United States is openly accepting million dollar bribes and we’re so used to his corruption that it doesn’t even crack the news cycle.

This is what an oligarchy looks like.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@SparkScouting @roachizm13 33 and 67 to the packers for 23. Pick whoever you want, as a Packer fan I want to move back.

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@Peter_Bukowski Just bc he can play nickel/safety doesn’t mean he will or should. His combine numbers say he can play outside. (Disclaimer: Not a professional scout.)

[ibs12345678 @Inhof]

@IKE_Packers @packers @oregonfootball No. Hope Alexander falls to 54, otherwise best available at 123. CB, WR, Edge or OL in 1-3, no particular order. Jahdae, Alexander/Umanmielen/Higgens/Royals - or Royals, Noel at 87 if no WR in 1/2. Also open to trading back to 30 if we can get extra 3rd, best available CB @ 30