@CruxMediaUK@EndMassMigrate You do realise there is no LEGAL way to claim asylum? You have to physically be in the country to do so, and there is no ‘visa’ or way that allows you entry for this reason. Therefore ALL asylum seekers are having to break the law to seek asylum.
https://t.co/3272XTonAB
Paddy was an incredible person. I sincerely hope that his message resonates with others, and that his legacy lives on. Falsely accused or imprisoned individuals are too often overlooked, and Paddy has done more for others, than he could ever have known. x
@flymeto72878318@zarahussain999@LozzaFox Negative fiscal contribution/deficit of £616.5 Billion!
Too many people blame migrants for financial issues & other problems in the UK. Look to the government who handed out dodgy contracts over PPE, and see where the money really is lost! Don’t blame those most in need! /End
@flymeto72878318@zarahussain999@LozzaFox That they are benefit scroungers etc. In reality look at any trustworthy statistical analysis and you’ll see that migrants actually make a net fiscal contribution to the UK economy of approx £5.3 Billion. Much more than is paid out. At the same time UK nationals have a net /4
@flymeto72878318@zarahussain999@LozzaFox And what method would you suggest the seek asylum? As it’s even clearly noted multiple times before, there is NO legal method to seek asylum, as you cannot do so until on UK soil, and can’t get a visa to come here for that purpose…
@0jCanonic@staffordlatic @apmindsetcoach @lisanandy If a black or brown horse is born in a stable full of white horses, is it still a horse? Of course it is, dumbass.
People are people, all the same species.
Humans for centuries have chosen to move or live in other countries?! So in your view Army kids are not British then?!
@OliLondonTV And can anyone point me in the direction of the information that says the individual is an asylum seeker? Can’t seem to find anywhere that says this, and seems to be just speculation in this post?
@moodyoldblue@p_m_davies @RachelCDailey That only applies to simple acceptance of an offer in contract law I’m afraid, so unfortunately doesn’t apply in this situation :(
@Roddy_Neilson@rajygoroc@RoddyQC Correct me if I’m wrong but wouldn’t the most senior KC in Scotland be the Lord Justice General, Lord President of the court of session, Lord Carloway? Despite not using the post-nominals, he was first appointed to the Queen’s Council back in 1990?
@DavidleanXO@MargaretMc15665 It does though? Just spread across different acts rather than in one? For example, for race: Public Order Act 1986 (as amended) s18(1) - “A person who uses […] is guilty of an offence if: (a) He intends to stir up racial hatred or (b) […] likely to be stirred up thereby
?
@Joesocial001@G4ilM@STVNews If you are in England or Wales, then sorry, but you do! It has existed for years, just not in one single act. Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, s.4a & Part 3A of the Public Order Act 1986 (as amended by other acts since) all contain nigh-on exactly the same protections!
@android_dogma@G4ilM@STVNews It absolutely does exist and has done for years, just not in one single neatly packaged act. Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, S.4a, Part 3A of the Public Order Act 1986 (as amended by other acts since) all contains nigh-on exactly the same protections!