I'm so excited for this launch, and incredibly proud of the work @cwetzel31 and @basketballvalue have put into this.
I'm really looking forward to how we can contribute to the sport of volleyball.
We are thrilled to announce the launch of Evollve!
Our goal at Evollve is to provide the volleyball community with consistent, reliable, and easily accessible data and analysis.
Check it out at https://t.co/TdHfRxmV83!
Midterm Model Melee update:
Consensus Senate Forecast has moved away from the Deomcrats - this leads to a drop in bankroll/credibility for the Silver Bulletin model since it is highest on the Democrats relative to the consensus.
A good illustration of where models and intuition disagree.
I think a lot of people, including coaches, think in terms of “scores behind” when it’s late in the game. So a 12 point deficit doesn’t feel any better than a 9 point deficit - it’s still “two scores”.
I wouldn't necessarily call it variance, but this tracks to the data I've pulled.
A team that is up 20 at the half underperforms by about 5 points in the 2nd half.
Joe Mazzulla says the Celtics analytics staff studied situations where teams led by at least 20 over the last decade.
He says that when you’re up by 20 in today’s game, not only is growing that to 30 not a realistic expectation, but due to variance, you’re really up by 15.
It will most likely shrink to 6 or 7. It comes down to how you then handle that situation.
@skepticalsports Potentially, although I think the average coach still under-optimizes under that standard. I think plenty of fans want their team to go for it.
But adding a large multiplier effect for win probability lost on failed 4th down conversions would probably capture fan engagement.
Win probability is not a bankroll you need to manage with a calibrated fractional Kelly strategy.
You're not going to parlay that 0.10 of win probability into a long term optimal growth rate.
There's no benefit in avoiding ruin if there is an option with a higher *expected* WP.
@peanut_bettor Not relevant to the Commanders situation, but just a general comment regarding coaching tendencies.
Kicking as soon as you're in "range" doesn't maximize win probability. It maximizes the probability you can blame somebody else for losing.
Some coaching decisions can be explained by assuming they view losing a game due to a missed field goal to be preferable to losing a game on a turnover or a failed 4th down conversion.
New Substack post: Midterm Model Melee
Pitting 3 forecasts of the Congressional Midterms against each other in a daily betting/prediction contest.
https://t.co/5OJDN4ZXom
@alejandroggo Yeah I think that’s probably right. But it also means there’s just fewer games.
Part of it is also just G5 of the 2016 Finals stuffing the ballot box.
Putting these two charts side by side, what jumps out is that the top shot in the NBA (+28% title probability), would rank just #6 on the WNBA list.
And that the 2016 Finals shows up on both of these charts.