I think that what Andrew played he ultimately had permission to share. However it would be disingenuous to say that a clip of the owner saying he didn't have permission wasn't also played. Did you listen to Andrew's whole livestream? If so the very first clip Andrew played was of the owner saying he does not give him permission to share it out. Ultimately we only have the owner agreeing that Andrew can record. It's all irrelevant because Utah is a 1 party state meaning as long as one person in the recorded conversation is aware and agrees to the recording and sharing.
No they wouldn't bring the owner up on the stand for an opinion. Nope. I watch trials and lawtube as a hobby. Andrew is now asserting opinions as fact to support his circular arguments. Diligent is sticking to how investigators investigate and court officials officiate. Every argument Andrew has for Candace's evidence he doesn't apply to the evidence he has released. And Andrew keeps moving the goalposts to attempt to get small wins but diligent is too good.
@TommyLaRussoLLC You're holding @RealCandaceO to a higher standard than you do fox news and new York Post. You yelling at them for breaking this story???????????
@TommyLaRussoLLC I will pay money to hear @DiligentDenizen keep Andrew on his toes any day of the week my god this is the best I've EVER heard anyone go up against Andrew. Share this space out like crazy!
@DiligentDenizen is crushing Andrew. He's pointing out that Andrew accepts some evidence and doesn't accept some dependant on his narrative but dili is sticking to what evidence would fly in a court. That DQ photo won't fly in court if they can't hammer down and prove a time stamp.
@Rach4Patriarchy@paleochristcon "Live chat that clearly hasn't watched all lives from all the creators on this case goes wild as Andrew provides an alibi for the wrong date". 🤣
@Rach4Patriarchy He provided an alibi for a date that wasn't in question. The alibi in question is the day of the alleged ft huachuca meeting. Sept 8 I believe.
@EsBigred@DiligentDenizen@Tailziez I listened to Andrew's live. The owner did not say it was selectively edited. His only issue is that it was shared publicly. Utah is a one party state so as long as one party is aware of the recording the it's not illegal to share the audio.
@Rust_And_Decay@DiligentDenizen@XrealJamesSmith Everything the owner said to Andrew he said to DD. Andrew uncovered nothing new. The owner wasn't even there that night so he can't confirm anything. If it was included in the trial they would call the servers to the stand not the owner who wasn't even there.
@rexjonesnewz It's exposure not promotion! Exposure is necessary! The people who believe interviews like this mean that the person doing the interview is platforming someone they agree with, are now best friends with, or they're doing it to promote their ideas suffer from cognitive rigidity.
Those of us with a high IQ know exactly what AW is doing and quite honestly this is not the subject for people with tactics(including lying)who put on an act. We want authenticity, honesty, truth, facts, logic, and common sense. I will be happy when I don't hear his name on a daily basis.