@DagobertIX@MJnanostretch You need to tell us how the first coronavirus acquired OrfX before you start demanding specific mechanisms for 12 nucleotides.
@DagobertIX@MJnanostretch There are many 12-nucleotide inserts; I just picked one with more CGG arginines than the 12-nucleotide insert in SARS-CoV-2 to kill two birds with one stone.
@DagobertIX@MJnanostretch I see you're the type of person who thinks inserts can't be acquired in genomes without mad scientists.
Unless you're a creationist, the evolutionary record is full of examples to prove this happens naturally.
@MJnanostretch Then why did you attribute a quote from Tedros to the SAGO report and say that the SAGO report explicitly said something that it doesn't even imply?
@MJnanostretch Honestly amazing you can’t admit to something so clear.
Did you actually lie initially or did you just fall for what Gilles or someone else said was in the SAGO report?
@MJnanostretch You said the SAGO report explicitly said lab leak is plausible. It did not.
You attributed a quote to SAGO. The quote was from Tedros, who’s not part of SAGO.
So, two lies actually.
@MJnanostretch Ok it’s quite clear now that you’re aware that you lied in this other post since you’ve removed those two lies in taking another crack at it this time.
https://t.co/9kM11krviB
Think of it; experts went from "pure baloney", not "plausible", &"extremely unlikely" (WHO explicitly ranking LL 4th of 4 scenarios) &supreme confidence in Market theory TO>> "zoonotic spillover &LL.. MUST remain on the table" (WHO now explicitly includes LL as a plausible hypo).