Interested

Ex med now helping people grow their savings

[Interested @interested075]

@jk_rowling @elonmusk As a suggestion, if someone switches off comments or only allows comments from followers to avoid criticism, consistency would suggest doing the same with likes and reactions too. If engagement is restricted, it should apply both ways not just to criticism.

[Interested @interested075]

@RupertLowe10 Can always tell the character of a man (or woman) by how they treat animals

[Interested @interested075]

@BritainisCool Rupert Lowe

[Interested @interested075]

@RupertLowe10 You were looking into mobile contracts but May I suggest you rather look into volume sewage treatment. I believe records are kept for this.

[Interested @interested075]

@PrisonPlanet @RupertLowe10 Another metric is sewage volume. Obviously won't take into account those who defecate in the street.

[Interested @interested075]

@DamianLow3 Your investment and financial illiteracy is astounding!

[British Intel @TheBritishIntel]

🚨🇬🇧 HOW TO FORMALLY COMPLAIN TO OFCOM OVER SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP - X

I have been working on this relentlessly the past day or two, so you don't have to. If you have any questions my DMs are open.

Ofcom does not provide a simple public complaints email for regulatory conduct. That does not prevent formal complaints being made.

To ensure your complaint is properly logged and cannot be ignored, I strongly advise using both routes below.

Email the Ofcom Corporation Secretary directly at:
[email protected]

Also submit the same complaint via Ofcom’s online contact form:
https://t.co/DKvTunjg5E

Below is the updated email template. Copy it in full, or amend as you wish, add your name, and submit.

Subject
FORMAL COMPLAINT REGARDING SELECTIVE REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT AND CENSORSHIP CONCERNS

Dear Ofcom Complaints Team,

I am writing to formally lodge a complaint regarding what appears to be selective and inconsistent regulatory enforcement in Ofcom’s approach to online safety, AI regulation, and platform accountability.

There is growing public concern that the UK Government, under Prime Minister Keir Starmer, alongside Ofcom as the statutory regulator, is directing disproportionate scrutiny and political pressure towards the platform X and its AI tool, Grok, while other AI platforms with comparable or greater capabilities remain largely unaddressed. This imbalance has created a strong perception that the current focus is less about genuine child protection and more about censorship and control of lawful speech, which is wholly unacceptable.

It is particularly concerning given that X has already implemented safeguards around Grok’s image creation and editing features. Access is restricted to paying premium subscribers who must provide verified personal and payment details. This creates a clear audit trail and enables targeted enforcement against identifiable individuals where the law is broken. In this context, it is difficult to understand why proportionate enforcement against offenders is not being prioritised, rather than pursuing platform-level restriction or suppression.

These concerns are further compounded by the apparent lack of comparable regulatory urgency in addressing long-standing safeguarding failures, including the historic and ongoing grooming gang scandals across the country. Similarly, platforms repeatedly identified by independent child-protection groups as being used for the grooming and exploitation of minors, such as Snapchat and online gaming platforms like Roblox, do not appear to attract the same level of regulatory focus or public pressure.

Taken together, these issues create the impression of uneven regulation and misplaced priorities, undermining public confidence in Ofcom’s independence and stated commitment to child protection and free expression.

I therefore request clarification on how Ofcom determines its enforcement priorities, why comparable platforms are not subject to the same scrutiny, what concrete steps are being taken to address platforms known to be used for child exploitation, and how Ofcom ensures its actions are not driven by censorship or political influence.

As an independent regulator, transparency and consistency are essential. I would welcome a substantive response addressing these concerns.

Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]

[Interested @interested075]

@DeborahMeaden @RachelReevesMP How to demonstrate your investment and financial illiteracy.

[Interested @interested075]

@Nigel_Farage @nadhimzahawi Next will be welcoming Boris Johnson.

[Interested @interested075]

@krassenstein @JDVance Possibly to stop her running over other innocent people?

[Interested @interested075]

@krassenstein Wasn't that what the Somalian fraudsters were doing?

[Interested @interested075]

@JohnCleese As someone with a large platform, you should do the adult and responsible thing by waiting till all the evidence comes in before screeching untruths.

[Interested @interested075]

@MikeTappTweets @elonmusk Try by stopping unvetted men from misogynistic third world countries entering the UK illegally.

[Interested @interested075]

@EssexPR Rhetorical question.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨🇬🇧 Meanwhile in Harrow England earlier

“She’s getting arrested for feeding the pigeons”

This can’t be real but it is - almost a Dozen officers arrest this Woman clearly non-threatening Lady.

Her crime?

She was feeding the birds on the High Street ‼️

[Interested @interested075]

@Keir_Starmer How's unemployment looking?

[Interested @interested075]

@GeorgeFoulkes 60 miles away and I am going to take a drive and show my support.

[Interested @interested075]

@UKLabour Nope. Still waiting.

[Interested @interested075]

@IlhanMN Marrying your brother is creepy

[Interested @interested075]

@LizWebsterSBF Dry your eyes deary.