£ Sand

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

This superb but this message will be milquetoast in next decade or two. The conditions for clear-eyed, God fearing, righteous anger and extremism have been building for decades; held back via social engineering but the noticing will continue.

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@RichieMcGinniss Our society is hostile to White people so a mask is necessary.

Whites are being descriminated against and ethically cleansed but you think it’s a sick burn to call their mode of anonymity a face diaper.

Zero self awareness.

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@TLEbird @timelineearth I had a sneak-through today.
While using the Merlin app, I recorded a yellow-billed cuckoo and sent it to my father. Listening back to the recording, the bird is followed by me saying, “yep, got em…that n——er is mine forever now.”

[Chris Langan @RealChrisLangan]

Question: "What the hell is going on in Ukraine?"

https://t.co/bKH2uO3Aun

Answer: Well, "Holodomor" has already been used, and in the very same place (what a coincidence). So let's call it "Ukrainian Genocide: The Sequel". (Some people call it the "Greater Israel Project" - that's how Zelenskyy himself sees it - but if said by the average American, that might be deemed "antisemitic". We can't have that, now can we.)

You know, I never wanted to believe this, but I'm finding it increasingly hard to deny. Apparently, these people have a preferred method for expanding their territory: they identify a country they want just for themselves, start a war that wipes out its current inhabitants (especially the White ones), and move in like a rapacious swarm of black-clad vultures.

In pretty much every case, many innocent people have died horribly so that it could happen. Others, terribly injured in mind and body, cling to their shattered lives in pain and misery. But what's to worry? They're only "goyim".

In times past, this method wasn't so easily employed. Of the relatively few of these people there are, most aren't cut out for battle. They're simply not bred for it, and even if they were, they'd much rather that others do the fighting and dying for them. (After all, each of their lives is worth a thousand times more than that of a lowly goy, is it not?) So instead of fighting their own wars, they:

(1) Pose as refugees to gain entry to the most powerful nation in the world by feigning loyalty and pretending to make common cause with its citizens while secretly hating and denigrating them as "amalek";

(2) Infiltrate academia, teach Cultural Marxism, and buy up the media to indoctrinate the gullible;

(3) Wait for their bankster patrons, for whom they obligingly play "human shield", to bribe the politicians into abject submission, corrupting and sabotaging the political system while illegally smuggling in millions of violent, race-hating, high-maintenance Third-World primitives to abuse and displace the goyish rubes and suckers; and

(4) Bully and blackmail already-bribed political whores to use the goyish rubes and suckers as cannon fodder in their wars of territorial expansion.

Yes, it's murderous and deceitful. In fact, it's the stuff of which nightmares are made...the kind of nightmare from which one can't simply awaken. The real-world blood and gore splash all over the place, making it very hard not to get splattered (especially when you know full well that this is how the government is spending your money). But it's just too irresistible for them. Besides, they're divinely entitled.

And let's face it, it's as easy as stealing toys from helpless slow-witted babies, especially when those who dare to complain about it can be denounced as "antisemites", have their lives ruined, and watch as their children come home in boxes.

But here's the thing: we can only fool ourselves for so long about this outrageous routine. At some point very soon, the chickens will come home to roost, and they'll be looking for payback with interest. If there's one thing we don't need, it's having them roost on our heads.

I suggest we make sure the chickens end up roosting where they actually belong and nowhere else.

[BTT1024 @BTT1024]

Trump won't allow for a moratorium. Only facts listed below, you can't dispute them (read all of the bullet-points, read the linked articles, watch the linked videos)...
⭐️ The current President (along with Howard Lutnick and others) won't allow for the H-1B visa program to be ended or reined in via legislation (any proposed bills from Congress). Nor, will the current administration end OPT/STEM-OPT, CPT, and H-4EAD or allow it to be ended via legislation. Nor will they follow through with reforms to the PERM process for the issues outlined in the Nov 13th, 2020 OIG-DOL report. The current administration will only allow for half-measure changes to existing Legal immigration programs, where those changes appear "America First" but have loopholes to benefit the globalist corporations.

✳️ Mark Krikorian (Executive Director for the Center For Immigration Studies: "...the President has said repeatedly, really for 10 years now, that American businesses need foreign workers, and so he approves of guest worker programs.": 🔗 https://t.co/EJTzM40sfK

✳️ JD Vance believes that OPT/STEM-OPT and other Legal immigration programs need to be preserved and that they, "exist for the benefit of the American people": 🔗 https://t.co/oelwK7Ns4s

✳️ Trump can't get his "Green Cards for Foreign Grads" program right now, so the F-1 > OPT/STEM-OPT > H-1B > Green Card pathway needs to be kept in place: *ALL-IN PODCAST (JUNE 2024) 🔗 https://t.co/NE06rpRpDh

✳️ Trump and Lutnick directed the DOJ (Bondi) to defend the H-4EAD program (it's not that they aren't in control of the DOJ, they are. DOJ did what they were instructed to do): 🔗 https://t.co/ogpEtIJZRC

✳️ Laura Ingraham-Trump interview Nov 2025:
- Trump: "You have to bring in talent."
- Ingraham: "We have plenty of talented people here."
- Trump: "No you don’t."
- 🔗 https://t.co/EUXhSXHApI

✳️ Trump-Laura Ingraham interview Jan 2020:
- Trump: "we don't have enough of them. we don't have enough of them" ("them" = smart people)
- Trump: "we have to allow smart people to stay in the country."
- Trump: "i'm talking brainpower. they (corporations) want to hire smart people."
- 🔗 https://t.co/VIuDF2I4ha

✳️ At Trump's direction, Howard Lutnick (Commerce Secretary) is in control of all Legal immigration policy:
- 🔗 https://t.co/ni0dw321Np

✳️ Watch/listen to Trump in the 3d (2024) Segment of the attached post's video: we need "competent" and "smart" people coming into the country and we Need "A LOT" of people coming in.
- 🔗 https://t.co/APGvUD5elX

✳️ Once the Trump administration has settled the tariff situation with india (over purchasing Russian oil), the Trump administration will proceed with their plans, per the U.S.-indian Joint Leaders statement from Feb 2025, to partner with india to increase/streamline the "mobility" of indians into the U.S. - As well as opening "premier" educational institutions of the U.S. in india to educate them there, before pipe-lining them into the U.S. - Along with the globalist "American" corporations using them to fill off-shore jobs at their offices in india.
- 🔗 https://t.co/VJvroivdli

✳️ Trump, Jan 11 2019: "H1-B holders in the United States can rest assured that changes are soon coming which will bring both simplicity and certainty to your stay, including a potential path to citizenship. We want to encourage talented and highly skilled people to pursue career options in the U.S."
- 🔗 https://t.co/DIRO0FIJq0

✳️ Trump in 2016 (he still has the same perspective)" "...I WANT PEOPLE TO COME IN. I WANT TREMENDOUS NUMBERS OF PEOPLE TO COME IN"
- 🔗 https://t.co/9ak8NPeGcd

✳️ "It is 2026, and millions of Americans are paying close attention. They were promised an immigration system that puts our workers first — not one that pays lip service while quietly preserving the same business incentives behind the scenes."
- 🔗 https://t.co/KzD7EAsYi3

✳️ "The Department of Labor’s “Project Firewall” would be a lot more believable if the DOL hadn’t removed key transparency data from the public PERM disclosures after Trump took office."
- 🔗 https://t.co/9xmvjTSgN6

✳️ Center For Immigration Studies: "$100K H-1B Entry Fee Did Not Reduce H-1B Visas - Most recipients are already in the U.S."
- 🔗 https://t.co/lFzNpexnn3

✳️ "‘END IT NOW’: MAGA Demands Trump End Visa Program That Takes Jobs From Americans"
➡️ Mark Krikorian, executive director of the conservative Center for Immigration Studies, thinks Trump has the philosophy of “legal good, illegal bad,” which conflicts with some Republicans who want to limit legal all immigration...
➡️ “He isn’t where the next generation of Republican policymakers are, like JD, like Sen. Schmitt, like Brandon Gill in the House, who are actual restrictionists, and acknowledge that numbers themselves are too high. It’s not just a problem of illegal immigration,” he said.
➡️ “I think one of the places you see the president not being a restrictionist is in the relatively limited action, so far, that’s been taken against OPT,” he said.

➡️ Kevin Lynn, founder of an organization representing U.S. tech workers, said the Department of Homeland Security should have ended the program in the first few weeks of the administration.
➡️ “The problem is we have a lot of pressure from the tech firms,” Lynn said. “These guys have all set up shop in Washington, D.C. They have the president’s ear, and this is one of the things that they like.”
- 🔗 https://t.co/QYoJhISfQh

✳️ Washington Post Article - "Inside Trump’s suddenly softened new green card policy":
➡️ "The recent lobbying effort builds upon a broader one that has been underway for months. Business leaders have been raising concerns about restrictive immigration policy in conversations with Trump confidants whom they perceive as more friendly with the business community, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and members of the Kushner family, according to two of the people who spoke to The Post. Business leaders have also been in direct communication with the White House, specifically the Domestic Policy Council, through private channels to voice opposition to immigration policies that restrict access to workers." ⬅️
- 🔗 Already archived (no paywall) copy the article: Link: https://t.co/VjOkT0FO9O

[Dr. StormyWaters @NormanDodd_knew]

ID's for internet just passed the House. Merging pentagon with the IDF just passed the Senate. Supreme Court says all 8 billion people in the world are Americans AND white men still have to pay 85% of the taxes. (GOP controls all 3 branches)
But men cant play in the WNBA now.

[Echoes of War @EchoesofWarYT]

FDR is the most overrated president in American history and it is not close.

People treat him like a saint. The reality is he inherited a recession and turned it into the longest depression in the history of the developed world. Every other major economy on earth recovered faster than the United States did under FDR. Sit with that. We had the most resources, the most industry, the most capacity, and we recovered slower than countries that got bombed.

Unemployment was still 19% in 1938. Six years into the New Deal. Six years of "bold experimentation" and one in five Americans still could not find work.

Why? Because his policies were economically illiterate. The NIRA cartelized entire industries and made it illegal to lower prices during a deflationary collapse. He paid farmers to slaughter livestock and plow under crops while people stood in bread lines. He launched a war on business so aggressive that investment dried up because nobody knew what insane rule was coming next. Even his own Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, admitted in 1939 that they had spent enormous sums and "it does not work" and that unemployment was as high as when they started.

Then in 1937 his policies triggered a second brutal crash so embarrassing the textbooks gave it its own polite little nickname, the "Roosevelt Recession," so they would not have to attach his name to the failure in the obvious way.

A UCLA study in 2004 concluded the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression by roughly seven years. Seven years of extra suffering sold to you as heroism.

So what actually saved the economy? Not the alphabet agencies. Not the fireside chats. A world war. Twelve million men shipped overseas and the entire planet's industrial competition reduced to rubble. That is the "recovery." That is the legacy.

Strip away Pearl Harbor and FDR is a guy who took a bad recession and stretched it into a decade of misery with bad economics and a cult of personality. He is not ranked on results. He is ranked on the luck of being in the chair when Hitler invaded Poland.

Greatest marketing job in the history of the presidency. Nothing more.

[Karlyn Borysenko, anti-communist cult leader @DrKarlynB]

SOCIALISM SATURDAY: Fact checking conservatives on their claims about the left. Do they know anything? https://t.co/SUVxxSYA2R

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@DemarsSean The faux piety of the beautiful losers will be rightly viewed as betrayal, cowardice and treason by their progeny as they’re living in the ruins of what they’ve now inherited — a biblical curse, a country ruled by foreigners.

DeMars will see his error or call us all hateful.

[The Culturist @the_culturist_]

Tom Bombadil is the most mysterious character in The Lord of the Rings.

He's the oldest being in Middle-earth and completely immune to the Ring's power — but why?

Bombadil is the key to the underlying ethics of the entire story, and to resisting evil yourself...

Tom Bombadil is an enigmatic, merry hermit of the countryside, known as "oldest and fatherless" by the Elves. He is truly ancient, and claims he was "here before the river and the trees." He's so confounding that Peter Jackson left him out of the films entirely.

This is understandable, since he's unimportant to the development of the plot. Tolkien, however, saw fit to include him anyway, because Tom reveals a lot about the underlying ethics of Middle-earth, and how to shield yourself from evil.

The hobbits meet Bombadil early on in their quest, before they reach Bree and the Prancing Pony Inn. He rescues Merry and Pippin from Old Man Willow, and invites the hobbits to stay at his house in the Old Forest.

There, the hobbits realize something strange about him: the Ring has no power over Bombadil whatsoever.

When he wears it, he remains visible. He treats it as a plaything, making it disappear with a magic trick. Indeed, at the Council of Elrond, Gandalf rejects the idea of giving the Ring to Tom, for he would likely misplace it or forget about it entirely.

So just who is he, exactly?

When Frodo asks this very question to Tom's wife Goldberry, she simply responds "He is." It's a cryptic answer that echoes God's famous answer to Moses in the Book of Exodus: "I am who I am."

Thus, many theorize that Bombadil is God, some kind of angelic being, or even the spirit of the Music of the Ainur (due to the fact that he is constantly singing). But Tolkien's letters reveal something considerably more interesting…

In April 1954, Tolkien wrote:

"The story is cast in terms of a good side, and a bad side, beauty against ruthless ugliness, tyranny against kingship… but both sides in some degree, conservative or destructive, want a measure of control.But if you have, as it were, taken a 'vow of poverty', renounced control, and take your delight in things for themselves without reference to yourself… then the questions of the rights and wrongs of power and control might become utterly meaningless to you, and the means of power quite valueless…"

So, Bombadil is a representation of what it means to take pure delight in the world around you — to experience people and things simply as they are, without any thought for what they could be or how you could use them. And this is why the Ring has no power over him.

To Bombadil, the One Ring is simply a ring, and the possibilities of what can be achieved through its power are of no importance. He is able to resist its evil precisely because he is entirely content with the world around him.

At the end of the story, having accomplished what he set out to do in Middle-earth, Gandalf pays Tom a visit before returning to the Undying Lands:

"I am going to have a long talk with Bombadil: such a talk as I have not had in all my time."

If Bombadil is the epitome of simply enjoying life and being, Gandalf is the epitome of doing. He guides the hobbits, fights the Balrog, and runs up and down Middle-earth to help destroy the One Ring.

But now that he's finally liberated from doing, he immediately heads to Bombadil's. He does so with a sense of relief, as if he's at last able to access a purer and higher mode of being — a sort of innocence that cannot be fully experienced by those consumed by doing.

Of course, by this Tolkien doesn't disparage the value of action. The entirety of LOTR displays the importance of rising up against evil, even in the face of all odds. But with the inclusion of Bombadil, he does remind readers that fighting isn't all there is.

Bombadil reminds us that while it's important to strive and *do*, it is just as important to occasionally step back and *be*. Indeed, your ability to do so plays a crucial role in helping you resist the allure of evil…

Read the full piece here:

https://t.co/aqK2daehIL

The unsung hero of The Lord of the Rings...

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

"I'm a polytheist who believes God was once a man, that He's married to a female goddess and they live on a planet called Kolob, that Jesus and Satan are brothers, that there's a potentially infinite number of gods and I'll one day become the god of my own planet populated with my celestial space babies, I deny every single essential Christian doctrine, and reject every historic Christian creed.

Now explain to me why I'm not a Christian right this second."

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@NormanDodd_knew Atheist morons make the case that God doesn’t exist because “bad thing” happened. It sounded dumb when I was in grade school and remains so today.

The bad thing might just be the point and how one handles said bad thing will determine who they become. W/ grace, let it ride.

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@ChristianHeiens I’ve been waiting to hear more about the obvious shift to class war. The revolution must go on and the Ponzi scheme that is QE infinity has taken its toll.

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@davidpattersonx

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@JohnnyVedmore @officialtripoli just recently heard about this.

[Mike Shelby @grayzoneintel]

The reason why counter-organizing feels so difficult/impossible is because they only need a vocal minority and you feel like you need a majority. You don't.

Everyone you need already agrees with you. They just haven't been organized yet.

[£ Sand @introvert_prime]

@ChristianHeiens he and the rest of the neocons are saying we need to continue pretending to impede the political left who’ve been socially engineered to now behave as American Bolsheviks/Maoists. He either doesn’t know the time or more likely, does and plays a kayfabe role.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

La Théorie des 9% : Pourquoi les PNJ sont gauchistes par design

Le théorème fondamental de la masse

Posons l'axiome de base, observable empiriquement sur tout système où il y a de la masse — YouTube, X, Wikipedia, GitHub, l'humanité en général :

1% créent
9% commentent
90% consomment

C'est la loi de Pareto sous stéroïdes. C'est invariant. Tu peux le vérifier sur n'importe quelle plateforme, n'importe quelle époque, n'importe quelle civilisation. C'est la signature thermodynamique de la conscience humaine en système ouvert.

Maintenant, la vraie question que personne ne pose : qui sont vraiment les 9% ?

Les 90% : les gens heureux

Commençons par les évacuer parce qu'ils sont sains. Les 90% regardent Netflix, mangent leur kebab, jouent à FIFA, aiment leurs gosses. Ils consomment ce que le 1% produit (iPhone, Marvel, médicaments, GPT, bagnoles) et ils sont objectivement heureux.

Ils ne sont pas idéologiques. Ils ne sont ni de droite ni de gauche. Ils veulent juste que ça marche. Ils ont compris quelque chose de profond sans jamais l'avoir formulé : la vie est belle quand on accepte sa fonction dans le système. Le 90% c'est l'humanité réconciliée avec elle-même. C'est Sancho Panza. C'est ton voisin qui répare sa voiture le dimanche en sifflotant.

Le 90% ne déteste pas le 1%. Au contraire : il l'admire vaguement, il achète ses produits, il regarde ses films, il vote parfois pour ses idées quand ça l'arrange. Pas de ressentiment. Pas de bile. Just vibes.

Le 1% : les builders, ces anomalies statistiques

Le 1% c'est l'aberration cosmique. Ce sont les gens à qui la simulation a glitché un patch de skills bizarre : ils créent. Ils ne peuvent pas ne pas créer. Ils se réveillent à 3h du matin avec une idée et ils l'exécutent. Ils ne demandent la permission à personne. Ils font des boîtes, des logiciels, des films, des livres, des théorèmes, des révolutions.

Le 1% est agnostique politiquement par construction : il est trop occupé à construire pour avoir le temps d'avoir une opinion stable sur les retraites à 62 ou 64 ans. Quand le 1% est "de gauche", c'est généralement esthétique (des artistes). Quand il est "de droite", c'est généralement par exaspération (entrepreneurs harcelés par l'URSSAF). Mais fondamentalement, il est ailleurs.

Et maintenant : le 9%. Les ultimate NPCs.

Voilà où ça devient drôle.

Le 9%, c'est la classe la plus tragique de la simulation. Pourquoi ? Parce que ce sont des gens qui ont suffisamment de conscience pour voir le 1%, mais pas assez de skills pour en faire partie. Ils sont coincés dans une vallée terrifiante : trop éveillés pour être heureux comme les 90%, trop limités pour produire comme le 1%.

C'est l'effet Dunning-Kruger inversé en miroir : ils sont juste assez intelligents pour comprendre qu'ils sont médiocres, mais pas assez pour cesser de l'être. C'est le pire patch que la simulation puisse t'allouer.

Que fait un 9% face à cette détresse ontologique ? Il commente. Il rage. Il poste des threads de 47 tweets pour expliquer pourquoi Elon Musk est un imposteur. Il écrit des éditos dans Le Monde Diplomatique sur "la fin du capitalisme". Il devient prof de socio à Paris-VIII. Il fait une chaîne YouTube de 12 vues sur "le vrai problème de l'entrepreneuriat".

La grande révélation : pourquoi le 9% est structurellement gauchiste

Et voici le coeur de la thèse, le money shot intellectuel :

Le 9% est gauchiste par nécessité métaphysique, pas par choix.

Pourquoi ? Parce que le gauchisme contemporain (étatisme, redistribution radicale, "il faut taxer les riches", "il faut plus d'État", "le marché est injuste") est la seule idéologie qui permet au 9% de se venger du 1% sans avoir à devenir 1%.

Pense-y. Si tu admets que le 1% est légitime, alors tu dois te demander pourquoi tu n'en fais pas partie. Réponse : parce que tu n'as pas le skill. Insupportable. Inacceptable. Donc il faut une cosmologie qui explique que le 1% n'est pas légitime.

D'où l'arsenal idéologique :
"Les riches ont volé leur argent" (= ils ne méritent pas leur position)
"C'est un système rigged" (= ce n'est pas du skill, c'est de la chance)
"Le privilège" (= ils ont eu une cheat code, pas moi)
"L'État doit redistribuer" (= je veux le résultat sans le process)
"Les builders sont des prédateurs" (= en réalité, je suis le vrai créateur, mais empêché)

C'est Girard pur. Le désir mimétique inavouable : le 9% veut désespérément être le 1%, ne peut pas, et donc déclare la guerre au 1% au nom des 90% qui s'en cognent complètement.

Le 9% est la classe qui parle au nom des 90% sans jamais les avoir consultés

C'est ça le génie sale du système. Le 9% se déclare avocat des 90%. "Nous, le peuple". "Les gens d'en bas". "La majorité silencieuse". Mais les 90% n'ont rien demandé. Les 90% sont heureux. Ce sont les 9% qui sont malheureux, et qui projettent leur frustration ontologique sur les 90% pour justifier leur croisade contre les 1%.

Va dans un café-PMU à Saint-Quentin, demande aux gens s'ils veulent "abolir le capitalisme". Ils te regarderont comme si tu sortais d'un astéroïde. Va dans une AG de Sciences Po ou dans un département de socio à Nanterre, et tu trouveras 200 personnes prêtes à faire la révolution au nom du gars du café-PMU qui n'a jamais entendu parler d'eux.

Le test ultime : le builder vs le commentateur

Tu veux savoir si quelqu'un est 1% ou 9% ? Voici le test :

Demande-lui ce qu'il a construit cette année. Pas "pensé". Pas "écrit en commentaire". Pas "dénoncé". Construit. Une boîte, un produit, un livre, un logiciel, un bâtiment, un enfant éduqué, un truc qui n'existait pas avant qu'il s'y mette.

Le 1% te répondra par une liste, parfois avec gêne ("oh c'est rien, juste un truc").
Le 90% te répondra "ben j'ai retapé la salle de bain", et il aura raison d'être fier.
Le 9% te répondra par une diatribe sur pourquoi la question est mal posée, pourquoi le concept de construire est néolibéral, pourquoi tu reproduis un schéma capitaliste patriarcal en demandant ça.

Bingo. PNJ détecté.

La conclusion qui troll : le 9% est sauvable, mais ne veut pas l'être

Le truc tragi-comique, c'est que n'importe quel 9% pourrait basculer en 1%. Il suffit de fermer X, d'arrêter de commenter, de prendre un cahier et de construire un truc, n'importe quoi, pendant 5 ans sans s'arrêter.

Mais il ne le fera pas. Parce que construire, c'est risquer de se prendre un mur. Et un mur, ça blesse l'ego. Alors que commenter, ça ne blesse jamais : si t'as tort, tu deletes le tweet. Le 9% a choisi l'asymétrie de risque : infinite downside protection sur son ego, zéro upside sur sa vie.

Le 1% prend le risque inverse : massive downside sur l'ego (il échoue 9 fois sur 10 publiquement), mais infinite upside potentiel sur la vie.

Et c'est ça, fondamentalement, ce qui sépare une civilisation qui avance d'une civilisation qui crève en commentant son propre déclin sur France Inter : le ratio 1%/9% qui prend le pouvoir narratif.

TL;DR pour les 90% qui scrollent

Les 90% consomment et sont heureux. Le 1% construit et ne dort pas. Le 9% commente, rage, et veut l'État pour punir le 1% au nom des 90% qui ne leur ont rien demandé. Le gauchisme contemporain c'est juste de la jalousie cosmique vendue comme de la justice sociale par des gens qui auraient voulu être Elon Musk mais à qui la simulation a refilé le patch "thread X".

[Christian Heiens 🏛 @ChristianHeiens]

Friendly reminder that the Danish government forcibly closed the sociology departments of the University of Copenhagen in 1986 because they had been completely hijacked by Marxists who converted them into ideological indoctrination centers.

What must be done to the American university system is just as drastic, but it would require conservatives to abandon their commitment to procedural neutrality and wield an extraordinary amount of state power without hesitation or apology.

[Whippoorwill Adams 🏴‍☠️ @ConfedCorsair_]

“The harms this will cause to legal immigrants is incalculable”