@americakaran And that perfect feeling was ruined for me when I watched the below-par Vishwanath & sons the very next day, which features the same kind of age-gap relationship with Mamitha Baiju, albeit in a rather artificial way.
@thatjun3@yuriyuriyuri67 The short answer is that she probably doesn’t find the feminine pronouns inclusive enough 🤷🏻♀️. There are indeed quite some feminists who think this way.
@yuriyuriyuri67 + The short answer is that she probably doesn’t find the feminine pronouns inclusive enough 🤷🏻♀️. There are indeed quite some feminists who think this way.
@yuriyuriyuri67 Perhaps she’s a queer feminist who doesn’t prefer the feminine pronouns because those are often donned by radical anti-trans feminists (Rowling and the likes) — and there are many of them in fact
@shamilrasheed8 Sometimes football has a way of impacting your life, in good and bad ways. When a mediocre season doesn’t give you much hope we tend to slowly withdraw until things start looking brighter again
Sometimes sorrow follows glee as spontaneously as a tide. Our real happiness and peace consist in dealing with this ugly aftermath with the equanimity of a river.
If you, like most people, simply don't know how you will pass the time until this comes out
I'm here to help, with my old profile of Sonia Gandhi, a reminder of why she is the most interesting political figure of the 21st c.
(gift link) https://t.co/KV2c0LIehw
I found the piece on @DAcemogluMIT by @TheEconomist very odd. Reminded me of the Monty Python scene "What have the Romans every done for us?" A substantive critique of a particular piece of work may have given us more to discuss. Daron can handle it (as he has in the past). I value @TheEconomist so not sure what this piece is about.
https://t.co/RMkihD2gcV
@edzitron@DAcemogluMIT Though the article is far from logical or credible, being on OpenAI’s board or being friends with Epstein is no reason, in itself, to reject someone’s arguments