@GaetenD And yet, that wasn’t the only time. This means it’s reasonable to point out that you do, indeed, have a habit of making “jokes” and taking positions that are opposite of your intended position. If you stand by that behavior then why get mad? I’m stating a fact that I’d want
@GaetenD And in context: Bloodlines. People think will be bad. Gaeten tweets "Hoping for high scores (76+)" Hours later, RT = 94%. Conclusion: Gaeten is a source of insider information. Later: Gaeten says Snow White will be good, plus look, I put money behind that thought. Conclusion..
@GaetenD@DeepDishEnjoyer YOU can’t post jokes in Kalshi forums because you’re an influencer and you know it. Non influencers can post whatever they want.
@GaetenD@DegensBet Or it exemplifies some of the mechanics of RT prediction leaving the trader to do the work. What’s most interesting is that Chad is often wrong in how he uses his own information. What he posts is reliable, therefore if he now posts a “joke” analysis, I’d have the same beef
@GaetenD@DegensBet Defensive much? Let’s talk helping—I’m helping Degens realize that there can be two sides to internet “helpful” trading comments. You sure didn’t like it when Chad in the comments offered helpful analysis. You are helpful—as long as it benefits you. Own it.
@GaetenD@DegensBet Ad hominem attacks are a bad look for you. You’re a poker player, you know that your ability to extract money from these markets depends on quietly preying on the inexperience of folks like @DegensBet. If they don’t bet you can’t win. Intentionally misleading them is gross.
@DegensBet@GaetenD Be careful. Gaeten has a habit of posting “joke” positions in Kalshi comments that are the opposite of his real position. He has done this more than once.
@ALScyborg@neuralink@elonmusk Of all the unimaginable frustrations of ALS, I can’t believe that no one commenting bothered to watch the video where all these questions are answered, forcing you to tediously type replies to their questions, wasting your precious time. I’m sorry.
@GaetenD The argument that you “must buy a share to comment” falls flat because you did not choose the cheapest share or an obviously ludicrous share. You chose a share that was the direct opposite of your real market position. This drives the price down for you and is manipulation 100%
@GaetenD Yes, because you are buying a share that does not represent your real market position. People joking in the comments is expected. People misrepresenting their position by actually buying a fake share is manipulation.
@Domahhhh@ZubbyBadger After watching the polymarket Ukraine mineral deal resolve COMPLETELY wrong via the UMA voting system, I’m curious what your thoughts are on how to prevent these things from happening on either platform.