Jens Peter Andersen

Senior researcher: bibliometrics, policy impact, scientific elites & quant studies of gender in research at @cfa_res_pol, @aarhusuni.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

Full transparency: the open call is open to all applicants, and guarantees for a job offer. I am offering to co-develop an application that addresses disruption in science, with plenty of room for personalising it. Granted applications are fully funded 3-year projects.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

What is disruption in science? I am looking for a prospective PhD student to study disruption theoretically, qualitatively and quantitatively at Aarhus University. If interested in developing your own project under our open call, in collaboration with me, please get in touch.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

We also show that there is a correlation between the concentration of funding on the best funded researchers and the imbalance in funding on diseases. However, we don’t have data to show which direction the causality arrow points - likely it is bidirectional.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

Do we fund the research that society needs?

We have a new paper out (with @EmilBargmann), studying disease burden data connected to research funding and activity in Denmark.

https://t.co/8bFd9vhCi1

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

We point out some diseases which are clearly underfunded, compared to how many people are affected by these diseases.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

Our paper presents a novel method for connecting these data points, which allows us to quantify the funding and research on specific diseases, and how large a share of the national disease burden they comprise.

[Jesper W. Schneider @schneider_jw]

Our comprehensive study on questionable research practices (QRP) is finally published @M_B_Petersen, @MejlgaardNiels, @ipoga, @EmilBargmann, N. Allum, B. Zachariae (PRINT project)
🧵(1/7)
#PLOSONE: Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? https://t.co/WNtldeOT8g

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

Time for this semiannual service announcement 😀Want to write a PhD in the broad area of “research on research”? We (@cfa_res_pol) have a fully funded opportunity: https://t.co/rzLICwFX1a

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

@Mettelee09 Når det så er sagt, så er der også en del “mandesygdomme” der er underprioriterede. Der er masser af ting at tage fat på, både for mænds og kvinders sundhed. Men problemet er total set størst for kvinder.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

@Mettelee09 Jeg har ferie, så jeg orker ikke gå ind i debatten for alvor… men til alle jer mænd der kommer med kritiske spørgsmål, så besvares de stort set alle her: https://t.co/MNFt6WBsNK. Der er ingen tvivl om, at forskning i kvinders sygdomme har været underprioriteret, generelt.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

Hi @Microsoft @Windows, I really like your new standard font for @Office, Aptos! It’s versatile, neat, but why is it not (officially) possible to change the system font face anymore? This used to be pretty standard “back in the days”! Will Aptos become system font at some point?

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

Vigtig konference om kvinders sundhed: https://t.co/9NqG7mQEuD
Der kommer eksperter med faglig viden om nogle af de forskelle der er i hvilke sygdomme der rammer mænd og kvinder, hvordan de behandles, og så fortæller jeg lidt om forskelle i bl.a. finansiering af forskning

[Camilla Gregersen @DMCamilla]

Fjernelse af studiepladser på universiteterne vil skade samfundsøkonomi og vil ikke få flere til at søge mod professionsuddannelser.
Stop ny ekstra dimensionering, #dkpol. @FjordMfs @BrianArlyJac @mhaarder @madseriksen1208

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

@kbkarlson @schneider_jw @mathiaswullum Scopus is more like WoS, conceptually, but yes, they include more (especially European) sources. There’s a pretty big overlap between WoS and Scopus in most fields, but both also have “unique” content.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

@kbkarlson @schneider_jw @mathiaswullum I recommend this paper for a nice overview: https://t.co/Z6oNEKpWfD

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

@kbkarlson @schneider_jw @mathiaswullum It’s differences in coverage. WoS is a selective database, where journals are vetted. GS much less so. Social science is underrepresented in WoS, so GS can be closer to “truth” here, but still some noise from gray litt., non-peer review, preprints etc.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

@StineLiv @UltraPedel Bakker 100% op om Kong Arthur, hyggeligt, pænt, fantastisk morgenmad. Jeg bruger det hver gang jeg er i Kbh med arbejde.

[Jens Peter Andersen @ipoga]

I wrote a chapter for this handbook that recently came out, and today I received my copy 😄 Thanks for inviting me @GemmaDerrick