@DrCatharineY Did you know that the HPV vaccine trial showed it caused between 41-100 deaths per 100,000 recipients and that cervical cancer cases increased rather than decreased after it was introduced in England & Scotland?
https://t.co/6kotx7JWp0
@DrCatharineY No vaccine is a marvel of science. In America, the capital of vaccine madness has the sickest population in the world. More vaccines more disease. I would send you back to medical school but there they only teach pharmaceutical terrorism.
@DrCatharineY 1
BMJ paper is 100% fraudulent
No correction for screening bias
Vaxxed group was much younger than unvaxx
The comparison of CC-IR of 1985-88 cohort with ages at follow up min 18 max 38 with the CC-IR of the 1999-2001 with ages at follow up min 10 max 24, is 100% PSEUDOSCIENCE
We've all heard the endless back-and-forth: "Vaccines save lives!" vs. "They're dangerous!" Both sides scream their arguments, point to studies, and dig in. But here's the fiery truth Del Bigtree just laid down in this clip—we have ZERO data. They haven't done the studies. 🔥
NO prospective placebo-controlled safety trials have EVER been done on the childhood vaccine schedule. Not on the current shots. Not even on the earlier versions they're "testing" against. Call out Paul Offit right now. Tell him Del Bigtree is challenging him to prove otherwise. He can't. He won't.
That means:
We DON'T know if vaccines are more dangerous than the viruses.
We DON'T know if the viruses are more dangerous than the vaccines.
We're injecting kids with DOZENS of shots and dividing our nation over toxic loads based on ZERO science.
The debate ends here until the science begins.
Full episode & breakdowns at https://t.co/kvKFg8muAB – don't miss it.
Share this if you're done with the division and ready for REAL informed consent. Who's with us? 👇 What do YOU think—time to demand placebo trials, or keep guessing with our kids' health? Reply now!
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.
I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.
Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.
We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.
Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore.
It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.
A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering.
Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
• The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate?
But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵
Dr. Peter Hotez was caught red handed… gaslighting families that have had pediatricians kick them out of their practices or worse, had protective services called on them for wanting to opt out of the CDC recommendations. @peterhotez says that in Dr’s offices, “there was never coercion.” We know this has been happening for years, but even CBS news reported this was happening as far back as 2012… a survey by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine showed that 25% of pediatricians have fired patients for refusing vaccines. Sounds like coercion to me… who’s gaslighting now?
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
Because no one has done it I lined up both videos time wise, put them side by side so you can see where the officer was when the first shot was fired in both views. He was in the process of being hit by her car.