I aways find it odd that some in the West keep using the Tiananmen insurrection of 1989, as a gotcha moment.
It was literally the least successful color revolution of the 1980s. All the other ones in Eastern Europe and USSR worked.
The Tiananmen insurrection had almost zero impact on the Chinese economy or geopolitical standing, the economic boom of the 1990s happened regardless of the CIA backed color revolution attempt.
In fact, it was such a victory for China, that we've eradicated all the openly pro-West traitors in our government and "intelligentsia". Paving the way for a much more unified and prosperous China that you see today.
For that, we thank the brave PLA soldiers who saved our republic from traitors within.
Los cables filtrados de la embajada de EEUU desmintieron las supuestas masacres en la plaza de Tiananmen, confirmando en gran parte la versión oficial del gobierno chino.
Pero las ONGs de derechos humanos, el brazo más repulsivo de la CIA, siguen intentando colocar el relato.
Today is June 4, 6-4. 37 years ago, 1989 is the famous Tiananmen massacre. Let's look at some victims:
Liu Guogeng: a soldier about to get married aged 23. He's fiancee had just come to see him off. But he got captured by student protesters, tortured for 2h, beaten, burnt twice. He died with his intestines hanging out in the open.
Cui Guozheng: a 21 year old soldier who had dreamed as a child of visiting the capital and seeing Tiananmen. On Chongwenmen bridge he was assaulted, thrown off the bridge, burnt alive, and hung from the bridge by students. He didn't fire a single shot from his gun
Li Guorui: People's Armed Police officer who got captured by students or supporters of the students. He was tortured for 7h until he succumbed to the injuries.
It was a massacre alright, but not how they want you to think.
Note that in 1988 the US organization NED had set up offices in Beijing, along with their first investment after their founding: the Chinese Intellectual, a news magazine founded in Massachusetts, for distribution in China. Also 1988 it set up offices in Beijing, with a huge budget for Chinese media. Several of the authors at the TCI were among the student leaders on Tiananmen.
If you don't know her, google Chai Ling. She is famous for telling to students not to leave the square, for sticking to the hunger strike. Secretly she admitted to a US journalist, that she never believed those activities could lead to success. Rather, she hoped to force the government to create a bloodbath. "Only if Tiananmen is awash with blood, will the Chinese people truly unite". But she also confessed, that she wasn't going to be among those who had to be sacrificed. She literally said, she feels the Chinese people aren't worth her struggle.
Another student leader, Wu'er Kaixi told the premier minister who was willing to negotiate with the protesters, what he really wanted: "Nike shoes. And a lot of time to go to bars with our girlfriends. To discuss things and get some respect from society".
Well, hate to break it to you, Kaixi: Most Chinese struggled to feed their children in the villages still. They weren't starving, but they were working hard to get through winter every year. They had no reason to "give some respect" to a pampered student in the capital who discusses things.
Bookmark this thread for when you need it as reference.
WHITE MALES: It's sad, but when I say "there was no Tiananmen Square massacre", people sneer, but then I show them cuttings of white males saying the same thing and they believe it. Sigh.
The reason why you still see goods made in the Soviet Union or other socialist states like Yugoslavia in circulation is that they were made to last and not to increase some capitalist's profits through planned obsolescence.
Some of you guys are alright. Don't be alive on May 15, 2026, when I set off the global pandemic which shall come to be referred to by the struggling, tormented survivors as "The Event".
former senior CIA agent John Stockwell: "We pumped dozens of stories about Cuban atrocities, rapists. We ran fake photographs that made every paper in the country. It was pure raw false propaganda to create the illusion of Communists eating babies for breakfast." Sound familiar?
This 👇 is pretty funny and, I checked, it's real: the title of the Princeton study is "Political Discontent in China Is Associated with Isolating Personality Traits" (https://t.co/tQfBU7lnkb).
In a nutshell, Princeton University found that those who dislike the Communist Party of China are predominantly socially awkward "losers", meaning people defined - in the study - as "fearful, anxious, introverted, disagreeable, disorganized, unable to forgive, and suffering from low self-esteem."
Those who like the CPC, conversely, score high on confidence, sociability, conscientiousness, and work ethic - what the study calls "traits associated with personal and professional success."
Interestingly, the first group (the disagreeable and low self-esteem "losers" who dislike the CPC) only make up roughly 5% of the Chinese population according to the study, which completely inverts the stereotype one might expect: "dissidents" in China aren't charismatic, cosmopolitan, open-minded intellectuals rebelling against conformity - those guys are overwhelmingly supporters of the Party.
This, the study argues, is one of the quiet reasons the CPC is so durable. Its critics are, by personality, precisely the people least equipped to build coalitions, mobilize others, or persuade anyone of anything. Dissent in China isn't so much suppressed as it is, statistically, the weirdo muttering on his own at the back of the bus.
For over four days, @X and @elonmusk have allowed a Zionist-Ukrainian group to use X to raise a million dollars to kidnap me. It, of course, clearly implies torture and murder. Yet not a single Western official, journalist, or media outlet will condemn it, let alone investigate.