@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Your selective ‘7th century gawaar jaahil’ attack while ignoring jaahil contradictions in your own ancient customs is peak hypocrisy at display. Pity? Save it for yourself, gawaar simp.
Grow critical thinking and stick to facts then type you low IQ cuck
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Defeat? 🤣 , the only one cherry-picking and adding bias is you, dodging data while repeating ‘religion bias’ like a triggered parrot. My points are secular evo-psych - Buss, divorce studies, pair-bonding research. No ‘creepy mindset,’ just biology you can’t handle.
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror still reinterpreted today to fit modern hypocrisy. Biology shows clear sex differences; that’s why preferences exist. You’re not a ‘humanist’ you’re a selective bigot who can’t handle data without religious slurs. Stick to facts or keep coping like the jaahil simp you are pebrain
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Typical triggered projection, chu Bhagat . My arguments are pure evo-psych data on mate value & body count. You attack one religion while your own ancient traditions are full of jaahil contradictions caste hierarchies, mythological exploits, and customs
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror If you had real brains I’d expose your misconceptions on Islam, but I won’t let you shift. Stick to the original topic or admit defeat, gawaar low iq feminist cuck .
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror You’re the one imposing blank-slate ‘equality’ fantasy on reality. Conservative cultures understand what your ‘modern’ denial ignores. Stay triggered, hypocrite.
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror You admit influences but run from outcomes like a typical follower of ancient jaahil customs that normalized wild contradictions in dharma while preaching purity.
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Again classic dodge, you peanut brain. I never claimed ‘objective moral metric’ - that’s your strawman . Mate value is functional mating & pair-bonding success in the real world, and data(divorce risk, satisfaction studies)shows high body count damages it for women in LTR context
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror That too because you can’t handle the clear sex differences.‘Influence but no metric’ is just cuck mind cope to deny reality. Keep throwing weak insults while dodging facts, matimand your peanut-level arguments are getting old just like your IQ
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Arre mand buddhi, no concession whatsoever. Biology heavily shapes mate preferences and real outcomes that’s the whole point of evo-psych. ‘Functional mating success’ is how those evolved drives show up in life, backed by data. You’re twisting words like a desperate gawaar cuck
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror No switching, you peanut brain how much to tell you to fit in it -mate value has always meant functional mating/relationship success in the market, not your moral ‘objective metric’ strawman. Wealth/status are biological cues for male provisioning; chastity for female fidelity.
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Mate value is functional mating success, not your moral ‘intrinsic worth’ bakwas. Divorce data shows real outcomes. You repeat the same gawaar line like a broken record while dodging asymmetry. ChatGPT cope? That’s your andh bhakt projection for losing on facts.
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Arre bail buddhi context-dependent doesn’t erase biology.Evolved preferences (Buss) have deep biological roots even if culture modulates - wealth for male provisioning, low body count for female fidelity.
@DrkaKnight@PuneetY06047553@Subermatakes@ThePuneMirror Your ‘poor man in poor society’ or ‘woman in open society’ doesn’t disprove the asymmetry. Buss shows sex differences in preferences because biology. Market desirability IS how evolved biology plays out. You’re the one confusing ‘no intrinsic value’ cope with science..