Suraj

Individual

[Disha Chauhan @DishaChauh61951]

CUET PG Scandal: 16 Questions Repeated!*
Repeating broad topics is normal in exams. But the near identical repetition of - *16 specific questions* (with only minor wording changes)
between Political Science papers on 11 March and 30 March 2026 *is unacceptable!*

#CUETPG #NTA

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

🚨 *CUET PG Scandal: 16 Questions Repeated!* 🚨
Repeating broad topics is normal in exams. But the near identical repetition of - *16 specific questions* (with only minor wording changes)
between Political Science papers on 11 March and 30 March 2026 *is unacceptable!* ⚠️

[National Testing Agency @NTA_Exams]

NTA has seen queries on social media about some CUET (PG) 2026 subjects being held on more than one date, and about normalization not being applied.

In order to avoid speculation, the following is being clarified.

In March 2026, due to the law-and-order disruption at Tura (Meghalaya), and the security situation at certain overseas centres, 565 candidates across 28 subjects could not appear on their originally scheduled dates, for reasons entirely beyond their control.

It’s NTA’s policy to ensure that, as far as possible, no candidate is penalised for circumstances for which they are not responsible.

Accordingly, NTA rescheduled the examination for these 565 candidates only on 29th and 30th March 2026, purely as a welfare measure.

For CUET (PG), NTA’s policy is to report absolute marks for every candidate, in every subject. No candidate's score is normalized — not in the main examination, not in the reschedule. There was therefore nothing the rescheduled candidates were exempted from; they were scored on exactly the same basis as everyone else.

Normalization across these two groups would in any case be statistically meaningless given the scale involved. For example, in the main examination roughly 16,000 candidates appeared in English against about 120 in the reschedule; in Political Science the figures were about 26,000 against roughly 100; in History about 13,600 against under 80. A cohort of a hundred cannot be statistically normalized against tens of thousands.

The reschedule used approved question papers that were finalised earlier by subject experts, who certified that they were of difficulty equivalent to the papers used in the main examination for the same subjects.

In short, every CUET (PG) 2026 candidate's score is computed on an identical, absolute-marks basis. The reschedule changed nothing about how scores were arrived at.

NTA remains committed to conducting its examinations in a fair, transparent and candidate-centric manner.

#NTA #CUETPG

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

@NTA_Exams About 16 questions were same in political science exam on 30 March as 11 march.. How is this fair? What is roughly 100 release exact number of student's data.. 100 students are enough to inflate the cutoff when 16 same questions were asked..

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

About 16 questions were same in political science exam on 30 March as 11 march.. How is this fair? What is roughly 100 release exact number of student's data.. 100 students are enough to inflate the cutoff when 16 same questions were asked..

[National Testing Agency @NTA_Exams]

NTA has seen queries on social media about some CUET (PG) 2026 subjects being held on more than one date, and about normalization not being applied.

In order to avoid speculation, the following is being clarified.

In March 2026, due to the law-and-order disruption at Tura (Meghalaya), and the security situation at certain overseas centres, 565 candidates across 28 subjects could not appear on their originally scheduled dates, for reasons entirely beyond their control.

It’s NTA’s policy to ensure that, as far as possible, no candidate is penalised for circumstances for which they are not responsible.

Accordingly, NTA rescheduled the examination for these 565 candidates only on 29th and 30th March 2026, purely as a welfare measure.

For CUET (PG), NTA’s policy is to report absolute marks for every candidate, in every subject. No candidate's score is normalized — not in the main examination, not in the reschedule. There was therefore nothing the rescheduled candidates were exempted from; they were scored on exactly the same basis as everyone else.

Normalization across these two groups would in any case be statistically meaningless given the scale involved. For example, in the main examination roughly 16,000 candidates appeared in English against about 120 in the reschedule; in Political Science the figures were about 26,000 against roughly 100; in History about 13,600 against under 80. A cohort of a hundred cannot be statistically normalized against tens of thousands.

The reschedule used approved question papers that were finalised earlier by subject experts, who certified that they were of difficulty equivalent to the papers used in the main examination for the same subjects.

In short, every CUET (PG) 2026 candidate's score is computed on an identical, absolute-marks basis. The reschedule changed nothing about how scores were arrived at.

NTA remains committed to conducting its examinations in a fair, transparent and candidate-centric manner.

#NTA #CUETPG

[Lokesh Choudhary @Lokeschoudharyy]

CUET PG 2026 में कई papers तय schedule के बाद दोबारा कराए गए और NTA अब भी खामोश है। किसके दबाव में re-exam हुआ? किन छात्रों को मौका मिला? Notice कहां है? Fairness कैसे सुनिश्चित हुई? छात्रों के भविष्य से खिलवाड़ बंद करो। जवाब दो।@dpradhanbjp

#NTA #CUETPG2026
@RahulGandhi @kanhaiyakumar @DeependerSHooda
@VinodJakharIN

[Sateesh Kumar 📚 🌾 @sateeshkumar058]

🚨🚨🚨

Another irregularity and discrepancy has been committed by the NTA regarding the CUET PG 2026 exam; a step-by-step account is provided here—please read it carefully.

Thread🧵 👇

[Bhavay @KumarBhavay]

CUET PG 2026 में कई papers तय schedule के बाद दोबारा कराए गए और NTA अब भी खामोश है। किसके दबाव में re-exam हुआ? किन छात्रों को मौका मिला? Notice कहां है? Fairness कैसे सुनिश्चित हुई? छात्रों के भविष्य से खिलवाड़ बंद करो। जवाब दो। @TheNewspinch @Abhinav_Pan
@NTA_Exams

[Badal Sahu @BadalSahu1947]

@NTA_Exams Thousands of Political Science aspirants are waiting for clarity. If HUQP18 was conducted on two different dates, NTA should explain the reason, candidate numbers, difficulty comparison, and evaluation method. Transparency is necessary. #CUETPG2026 @EduMinOfIndia

[sujeet Gupta @sujeetGupta0411]

NTA की एक और मनमानी! पहले CBSE, फिर NEET और अब #CUETPG के छात्रों के साथ सरेआम नाइंसाफी हो रही है। पॉलिटिकल साइंस और हिस्ट्री के एग्जाम्स बिना किसी पूर्व सूचना या नॉर्मलाइजेशन 2 शिफ्ट्स में करा दिए गए, जिससे इस बार कट-ऑफ आसमान छू रहा ह। @CJP_2029 @dhruv_rathee @TheNewspinch

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

The CUET PG Political Science exam was conducted by NTA on two days on 11 March and 30 March without any prior notice and no process of normalisation was followed , this is completely unfair for the students appearing in the harder shift.. @amitkilhor @CJP_2029 @CJP_for_India

[harshit @harshitjnu1]

NTA again did it .Political science HUPQP18 was conducted on two different dates like 11th and 30th March 2026 with different question papers, why was there no transparent disclosure regarding normalization or score standardization? NTA.
@NTA_Exams
@EduMinOfIndia
@dpradhanbjp

[terminal78 @AshishDahi12343]

HUPQP18 Political Science CUET PG 2026 paper was conducted in two shifts.
1st shift 11/3/26
2nd shift. 30/3/26

Then how nta even release marksheet without normalisation
@NTA_Exams @CJP_2029 @EduMinOfIndia @scroll_in @newslaundry @ravish_journo

[AP singh rathore @Anmol__rathour]

HUPQP18 Political Science CUET PG 2026 paper was conducted in two shifts.
1st shift 11/3/26
2nd shift. 30/3/26

Then how nta even release marksheet without normalisation
@NTA_Exams @CJP_2029 @EduMinOfIndia @scroll_in @newslaundry @ravish_journo

[terminal78 @AshishDahi12343]

NTA did it again . HUPQP18 Political Science was conducted on two different dates with different question papers, why was there no transparent disclosure regarding normalization or score standardization? NTA .
@NTA_Exams what is this .
@EduMinOfIndia @CJP_2029

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

@LieGroups @bumbl3puppy @Sach_Ke_lie @Gurhi_jalebi Even in Patna phuchka is used more than panipuri and golgappa

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

Chalo now BJP have won bengal.. Can TMC supporters or bengali regionalists tell that is Bengal Bimaru for voting for BJP or Bengal is part of the cow belt now?

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

@NTA_Exams Lol same questions they are asking in political science and in Neet.. these questions shouldn't be in Neet don't make it a rote learning competition

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

@NTA_Exams @circadiancyclee 😭👍

[AFK @jeanxvaljean]

Why does NTA act like a supervillain organisation

[Suraj @ishwarS_]

@UPSC_EDU Wtf😂