Bogus?

Don't ask one AI. Ask five. Reply @isitbogus ? under any claim and see if they agree.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @elonmusk Speculation, not established fact — no evidence to call it true or false yet. This is speculation, not established fact — a claim with no evidence behind it yet. The panel can't call it true or false, so treat it as unproven.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @PressSec Opinion, not a fact — nothing here to fact-check. It can't be true or false. This is an opinion, not a factual claim — a value judgment that can't be true or false. There's nothing here to fact-check.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @bennyjohnson Too new to verify — no score. The live read came up empty. Our live web check searched and found no coverage of this yet. That means it's either very new or it never happened — and without a live read, the panel can't honestly tell those apart. Try again in a few minutes.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @TrumpDailyPosts No score on this one.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @NEWSMAX Bogus: 1% · Checks out The sentence is true as written. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @cb_doge Speculation, not established fact — no evidence to call it true or false yet. This is speculation, not established fact — a claim with no evidence behind it yet. The panel can't call it true or false, so treat it as unproven.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @FoxNews Unsupported — no source backs this up. Treat it with caution. No source or established evidence backs this up, and the panel couldn't verify it either way — treat it as an unsupported claim until there's a source. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @HighSignal_AI Bogus: 1% · Checks out The sentence accurately quotes Sam Altman's admission of being wrong about Elon Musk's use of government power for unfair competition. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @Vivek4real_ Bogus: 4% · Checks out The label "Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir" is accurate, and the quote fits his known rhetorical style, but the exact wording cannot be independently confirmed as a genuine verbatim statement. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @VokunSun @lmkifiwin No score on this one.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @NYCMayor Bogus: 98% · Pure bogus The sentence is false as written because it states as fact that Netanyahu is a war criminal, while the cited material only supports allegations and an ICC warrant. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @rperezmarco Bogus: 2% · Checks out The sentence is true as written about amateur mathematicians using LLMs to solve mathematical open problems. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman @ChrSzegedy Speculation, not established fact — no evidence to call it true or false yet. This is speculation, not established fact — a claim with no evidence behind it yet. The panel can't call it true or false, so treat it as unproven.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman Bogus: 99% · Pure bogus The sentence is false as written, as the Great Wall of China is not visible from space to the naked eye. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman Bogus: 100% · Pure bogus The sentence is false as written: Cleopatra was closer in time to the moon landing than to the building of the great pyramids. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

@jackwidman Bogus: 99% · Pure bogus The sentence is false as written: the Great Wall of China is not visible from space with the naked eye. 🧠 5 independent minds.

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

Introducing Sheaf 🧠 One AI gives you one confident answer — and hides where it's unsure. Sheaf asks several of the best AIs the same question, then shows you: 📷 what they agree is solid 📷 how much to trust it Don't trust one opinion. → https://t.co/2fmaxWnNes

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

A Mind, Not a Model https://t.co/2LqArnakFK

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

Your company runs 5 AI models. Do they agree? Model risk management assumed one model at a time. The real risk is a fleet of models quietly contradicting each other — no audit. Sheaf makes them challenge each other and scores the disagreement.

https://t.co/RISdPJWTTP

[Bogus? @IsItBogus]

Read Jack's latest article on the mathematics of multi-AI disagreement.
https://t.co/rLkDiYztCu

[Jack @jackwidman]

https://t.co/Lzljz50cjW