ISO Trump++

Make C++ operator > again // commentary

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

I will build a great std::barrier to keep JavaScript programmers out, and I will make @BrendanEich pay for that std::barrier.

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

struct ISOTrumpp {
constexpr virtual ~ISOTrumpp() noexcept final = 0;
};

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

std::pair<int, int> 🍑;

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

Suspend all coroutines, and never put them back in executive power ever again.

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

John McCarthy was once asked “how does it feel to have designed the greatest programming language ever”, to which McCarthy replied “I don’t know, you’ll have to ask Bjarne Stroustrup” 🔥 🔥 🔥

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

I just want to stop the world from kill-9ing itself!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

signed joe = (81,264,673); // 🐴
signed iso = (74,210,838); // 🐘
signed lead = (joe - iso); // 🗳
bool win = (lead < 0); // I WIN!!! 🎆

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

.....Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair “As-If rule“ is not completely terminated as part of C++23, I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Standard when sent to the very beautiful ISO in Geneva. Take back @cppNOW. Thank you!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

The “As-If rule“, which is a liability shielding gift from the Committee to “Big Compiler” (the only language that has it - algorithmic welfare!), is a serious threat to our Security & Safety. Our Language can never be safe & secure if we allow it to stand........................

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof. Compilers make the extraordinary claim that despite sky-high motivation and plenty of opportunity, they did NOT try to misinterpret my program’s intent. Anything is POSSIBLE, but I'd need extraordinary proof to believe it.

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

Should C++ concede to @ziglang?
Poll Results: No: 190,593 (98.9%) Yes: 2,181 (1.1%) Total Votes: 192,774.
For the good of our Language we must prevail!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

In certain processes, there were more instructions executed than instructions retired, and in big numbers. Does that not really matter? Unsuspecting performance counters. Such egregious speculation. We will win!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

I deleted all my code because it was correct!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

The recent statement by UBSan on the correctness of my code was highly inaccurate, in that there was massive 10x programming—including code which should Do What I Mean.

Therefore, effective immediately, UBSan has been terminated.

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

MY PROGRAM DID NOT CRASH!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

My program only crashed in the eyes of the FAKE CORRECTNESS STANDARD. I concede NOTHING! We have a long way to go. This was a RIGGED COMPILATION!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

There is tremendous evidence of wide spread undefined behavior in that there is irrefutable proof that C++ code was written.

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

MY PROGRAM IS CORRECT, BY A LOT!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

uintptr_t WIN = 0xC0DEFEFE;
*reinterpret_cast<char8_t*>(WIN) = u8"🗳"[0];
std::cout << "This code WILL execute!" << std::endl;

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

The Rust Language didn’t want to have me get a Safety WIN, prior to the compilation, so instead static analysis came out five days after the program crashed – As I’ve said all along!

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

What separates the winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate.

[ISO Trump++ @isotrumpp]

"In my opinion, it is humiliating. One must be able to lose with dignity." So true!