@MartinGTobias@pavelprata@hkanji That’s literally the job. 20-25 deals > pick the 5 winners and give them as much money as possible.
If you are not good at picking, pro rata is the least of your worry
The maths is right the philosophy is not. Very much disagree. Yes it theoretically hurt multiple to follow your money.
But by not following into generational companies you leave so much $ on the table.
Not doing follow on also assume you are able to take high % ownership from the get go which is less and less frequent
If you had done the seed or A or Anduril your reco is passing on the B and C? As long as you can return the fund with new $, then you are still in venture territory.
We overthink this as venture investor: find the best founders, give them as much money as possible.
London, Paris and most major European cities sit within range of an Iranian ICBM, and our reserves of Patriot missiles aren't what they used to be….
Thank you @Cambridge_Aero for protecting us. And tip of the hat to our ally @DerJunaid !
Today at @Cambridge_Aero we're announcing a $300M Series C funding round to accelerate our mission to protect Allied skies.
Thank you to lead investor @dfjgrowth and for the continued support of our backers @Accel, @eladgil, GFC, Lakestar, @Lux_Capital, Never Lift, Ora Global, @sparkcapital
Get that you are talking from an end user usage perspective. 2 is directionally right but I think some angle missing that exacerbate timing even more. Deployment or rip/replace of 2 is a larger decision often some level of exec committee / board level; not just at ic level. They have a long term “proven ROI”, a brand at multiple exec level, pre existing relationships/distribution etc… and for some (that are relatively unlevered, profitable and large enough) they have a lot of time and money to invest in AI and find ways to adapt with customers
European pro European here and agree with the above. For me the argument is the volume of high potential / high valuation companies is much higher in the US. Its not about a podium.
You need a sheer volume of A outcomes (not necessarily A*) to fuel the ecosystem. And we aren’t there yet!
@HarryStebbings Well… 15 years of you had invested in Nasdaq vs. 7yrs if you had picked the winners
—> public or private: picking is key
https://t.co/iKAnx6e46J
@chelsveteran@SebJohnsonUK@modic123@wanderingvc Not really. Revolut deal was June/July 15 ; Harry left in May (though his LinkedIn says Jul, he did a blog post in May and was out then … likely in garden leave)
@paulg But only 7 years if you had only picked winners (Amazon, adobe, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP).
And by end of 2021 you’d have been at 18x with those names vs. 3.5x with Nasdaq.