@NYMag And to make it doubly remarkable, it’s a 3-hour film and that is in no way stopping people from seeing it. All of the accolades it’s been receiving are more than well-deserved.
@GeauxGabrielle “And angry because she is contributing to a narrative that women somehow have it easier in the carceral system than men.”
Tell us how the film went way over your head without telling us the film went way way waaaaaaay over your head.
@nypost Zero tolerance to this. And on top of that make him or his family pay for the cost of rerouting the flight. The way to make people think twice about doing this sort of 💩 is by punishment.
@HamLinehan No one is ‘centering’ a yt man, whatever TF yt means. She’s what? Marginalized?! 😂😂😂 You really can’t make 💩 up. The film is a fascinating depiction of two extremely dysfunctional people and the best you can come up with is the tired victimhood pamphlet? Once again, 😂😂😂.
@UK_murph@Roolockwood I tried to read as little as possible about her ‘case’ before I saw it but it makes no difference if you do or not. The film is not so much a cheap Dateline step by step of what she did but a fascinating depiction of two extremely and very differently dysfunctional people.
@Roolockwood The genius of the title and content is that you can and do see everything, unless you choose to think it’s all buried under layers of nuances. It’s a fascinating depiction of how truly dysfunctional people can bring each other down a path of destruction so easily and so quickly.
@adamtaggart The genius of the title and content is that you can and do see everything, unless you choose to think it’s all buried under layers of nuances. It’s a fascinating depiction of how truly dysfunctional people can bring each other down a path of destruction so easily and so quickly.
@DrewCerullo@adamtaggart I think the genius of the title is that you actually can see everything, unless you choose to think it’s all buried under layers of nuances. It’s a fascinating depiction of how truly dysfunctional people can bring each other down a path of destruction so easily and so quickly.
@paisitfwd@adamtaggart This is not a Dateline episode so it’s definitely a challenge for people with attention span issues. The movie is a brilliant simmering not only of her perception of her of herself and the project itself but also of their very dysfunctional relationship.
@adamtaggart@goretexamerica “Beats me why they thought documenting their inner life would be a good move.” That thought seeped into my mind every 10-15 seconds.
And yes, besides being a textbook case of narcissistic behavior, to say the husband is not intellectually impressive is a gross understatement.
@WestIdp@adamtaggart Three hours is definitely a stretch but absolutely worth it. If weren’t that curious to see it I would have waited for it come out on streaming platforms so I could watch it leisurely at home.
@FuncMed_MD@adamtaggart You haven’t seen narcissistic behavior until you watch her husband, partner, whatever they call each other these days. Again, neither one a victim. The real victims are the children.
@adamtaggart Finally saw it today. To your truly insightful comments I’d add they’re both HOT MESSES for very different reasons. She’s socially-handicapped at a disturbing level and he’s basically using her as he pleases. She’s the prey and he’s the hunter. The only victims are the children.
@realMaalouf The real issue is: were the natives happier back then than they are now? One would have to be really disingenuous to think they’re happier now. And it has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with today’s sickening oppression. But, hey, let’s bash the colonizers.
@dpiaAvatar@realMaalouf Do you mean it as a statement or a question – because as a question it’s poorly worded. The real issue is: were the natives happier back then than they are now? You’d have to be really disingenuous to think they’re happier now.