A⚖️

🇬🇭🇱🇷 … Barbie

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths.

Proverbs 3:6

[Nicki Minaj @NICKIMINAJ]

Receive what you’ve been praying for right now. Receive it.

[nína on ya hip @ninaninemilli]

Sometimes God is protecting you from things you can’t even see

[DJ Akademiks @Akademiks]

Who gon tell him da truth bout these freestyles… they getting worse and they didn’t start off good to begin w

[𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗺𝗺𝘆💗 @Urfv_shammy]

i be looking mean and unapproachable but im really just a sweet girl 😭😭😭

[Nicki Minaj @NICKIMINAJ]

Jay z take off that fucking LACE FRONT

[Snipe @BabySnipepnb]

Rylo Album Definitely Better Than Future Album !

[DontDrinkTheRedKoolaid @ThaGirlAnna]

So it was a wig? 🤣🤣🤣

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

NBA young boy better

[Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴 @big_business_]

👤NBA YOUNGBOY👤

💿WHAT DA WHAT💿

⬜️FUTURE DISS⬜️

🚨OUT NOW🚨

“i wanna go bezel for bezel , i wanna go hit after hit , i wanna go million for million pussy prolly wanna go bItch for bItch”

“Hatin ass ima villain , Old ass ima catch when ya down bad and stretch ya”

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

Beyoncé such a bird ass bitch

[Ҝ @__kdash_]

You can always count on me to bring common sense to the conversation

[Shayla @sportsbyshayla]

i’m here on this earth to love.

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

She literally only belongs to God!

[🅒🅗🅛🅞🅔 💗 🦏 @thatsso_chloe]

Nicki is ours??????????????? Hello 911!

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

Yeah Millie!!!!!!

[ComeWithFacts @ComeWithFacts]

🚨 Megan Pete (Megan Thee Stallion) v. Milagro Cooper Update:

Milagro Cooper (Pro Se), has filed a Rule 60(b)(6) Motion seeking relief from the judgment and amended judgment, along with a supporting declaration and multiple exhibits.

Her motion argues that certain relationships creating an appearance of partiality were not known to her during the litigation and came to her attention after judgment was entered.

According to the motion, supporters brought those relationships to Milagro’s attention around the time the Court reinstated the defamation verdict. She says she then began researching the publicly available records, court filings, attorney biographies, and other documents before bringing this Rule 60(b)(6) motion. Her declaration explains the timeline of when she learned of the information and how she verified it through public sources before filing.

The motion argues that Judge Altonaga’s husband is a longtime partner and board member at Holland & Knight LLP, and that Holland & Knight represents nonparty Desiree Perez in a separate litigation with her daughter, Demoree Hadley.

Milagro Cooper also points to evidence she says shows Perez individually or through Roc Nation LLC may be funding and have actively been involved in this litigation from its inception, including prior statements made on the record and portions of Megan Pete’s trial testimony.

The motion argues that, viewed together, these publicly documented relationships could lead a reasonable observer to question the appearance of impartiality under the objective standard established by Section 455(a).

Importantly, this motion does not accuse Judge Cecilia Altonaga of actual bias or misconduct. Instead, Milagro is relying on 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), which provides an objective legal standard requiring recusal whenever a judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

To support that argument, Milagro attached 14 exhibits, including Eleventh Circuit filings regarding her appeal, communications with former appellate counsel Jeremy McLymont, trial transcript excerpts, filings from the Hadley litigation involving Desiree Perez, attorney records, certificates of service, and social media posts documenting when supporters first alerted her to these issues and when she began investigating them.

Procedurally, this filing is significant because Milagro’s appeal is already pending before the Eleventh Circuit. Before an appellate court considers these issues, the district court generally has the first opportunity to decide whether the newly raised Rule 60(b)(6) arguments warrant relief.

In practical terms, Milagro is asking Judge Altonaga to indicate whether the motion would be granted, or at least whether it raises a substantial issue. If the district court makes such an indicative ruling, the Eleventh Circuit could then issue a limited remand so the district court can formally rule on the motion while the appeal remains pending.

The motion is now pending, and Megan Pete’s legal team has until July 21, 2026, to file its response. After that, the Court will determine whether any relief is warranted under Rule 60(b)(6) and Section 455(a).

Motion Rule 60(b)(6):
https://t.co/BgbWqBKnuB

Declaration:
https://t.co/MsCCPIFFAp

Exhibits:
https://t.co/DR0wXqnb1y

[MURDA ON THE BEAT @murdabeatz]

Keep God First

[TraphouseJodeci @Ye_Ali]

I regret giving my number out everytime I do it 😂

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

Thank God!

[Dexerto @Dexerto]

FIFA has opened an investigation after IShowSpeed was allegedly subjected to racist abuse during Argentina's World Cup match against Cape Verde

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

Bitch Alex looks good in anything! Is that her?

[Lola @malbwgaf]

Zendaya in Schiaparelli Fw26 Couture + styled by Law Roach.

[A⚖️ @itss__ae]

Lmaooo they better step!

[val @moneygomillion]

colombia realizing they suddenly have to represent all of latin america

[Lady Yak 🌼 @Nisha_Booh]

I’ll disappear for life if you let me.