I love and respect dhh as much as any other young programmer who is inspired by his love for computers.
But I can't help but imagine that, as a black person, he would not want to see me living in Denmark or the larger Europe, regardless of my contribution to the country.
He would prefer Europe to look like it did in the 80s, or to be as homogeneous as Japan, as he said on the Lex pod.
He mentions having a positive contribution to the society, but after listening to him more, it seems to me that he cares far less about that than about whether the immigrant looks more like him.
That means, even if I contribute to their economy, pay my taxes, raise my family there, and integrate into the culture, he would not really want to see me move there with my immediate black family, because I would be disturbing their homogeneity.
I thought for days about what that actually means. It means no matter what I do, no matter how much I give, the door will always come with an asterisk. "You're welcome, but only if you physically blend in."
I lived in London and Amsterdam. I contributed positively to their economies, that's why they let me in, in the first place. And I like to think I am well assimilated into the society and culture.
But because I do not look like what Britain looked like 100 years ago, nor does my immediate family, dhh would rather not have me live in Europe, or even marry there!?
By that logic, would you also tell Jude Bellingham he doesn't belong? Or Sir Lewis Hamilton? Or Marcus Rashford, who fed millions of British children during the pandemic when the government wouldn't? If dhh's version of Europe has no room for people who look like them, then what he is really saying is that contribution doesn't matter. Appearance does.
And I get that not everyone assimilates equally, and that it is okay to have standards for who you want in your turf. Every nation has a right to shape its immigration policy. That is not what I am arguing against.
But why do it in a way that clearly shows favour and discrimination in equal measure based on how a person looks? Why not simply judge from person to person, instead of categorizing whole groups and communities?
Europe immensely benefited from Africa and its resources. They went to Africa and laid the entire continent to siege, extracting minerals, labour, and wealth for centuries.
My country is still reeling from those effects to date, having gained independence only about half a century ago.
And yet, merely 50 years later, Europe is so harsh to Africans that they do not want them, even legally, accessing opportunities in Europe?
There is something deeply contradictory about benefiting from a continent for centuries and then shutting its people out when they come seeking the same prosperity your ancestors built on their backs.
Britain has a huge healthcare crisis and a massive shortage of healthcare workers. Guess who is the backbone of that? Immigrants, most of them African and South Asian. They work night shifts, they hold the system together, and they do it quietly.
Isn't it irresponsible to walk into a hospital and say, "I do not like the demographics of this hospital. I would have preferred if it looked like it did in the 80s"?
I used to think people had a problem with illegal immigration. But no, it is not illegal immigration they oppose. They simply do not want immigration from certain parts of the world. God forbid if you are just a good human being from that part of the world yearning for better opportunities.
You can have a PhD, speak the language fluently, pay more in taxes than most locals, and still be told you don't belong, simply because you don't look the part.
Why won't we just vet individuals and give everyone a fair chance? Judge the person, not the group. Character, not colour. Contribution, not complexion. I beleive this is not a radical idea, it is the bare minimum of fairness.
To dhh, please don't block me for asking this 😅, and I really do hope I am wrong and that you clarify this. Would you happily let me and my black family become your neighbours in Copenhagen, if I don't have a problem with assimilation? Do you feel the same about the USA?
I am genuinely asking these questions and I welcome discourse here bc I really do want to believe dhh is a good person and he does not have a problem with people who are not white.
And if the answer is no, then what we are really saying is that there is no amount of effort that makes someone like me acceptable. And that is a huge problem for all of us.
I hope I am wrong.
Kaka.
The camera deserves and shout, every shot, position, and movement is deliberate and perfectly taken to pull you right in. However, costume settings weren't perfectly accurate to the period.
📝 Final Verdict: 7/10
#MyFathersShadow#moviereview#review#movie(9/9)
MY FATHER'S SHADOW - 7/10
This is not the everyday Nigerian film. No noise, no forced drama, just a quiet story that grips you and doesn't let go. Here's my review 👇 (1/9)
📖THE ACTING
I used to scream at Nollywood for how callous their child characters are: no charisma or wit, just loud and nonsensical talk. But Remi and Akin did amazingly, witty and grounded, and they made the story smooth sailing. Justice done by all cast members.(8/9)
@iphy_chidozie Who taught them?
When African elders have left being wise, having integrity, be selfless and uphold community values what do you think would happen to the younger ones they are supposed to teach and mentor?
@alazygooner The reason we are not complaining is because Arsenal was totally rinsed from beginnung to end and front and back. There is nothing to complain about as it was evident disallowing this goal won't do anything for the team. We were already handed our asses before the third goal.🤷♂️
@IfechiCutesy The director/producer and writer are to blame. Actors can't do much for a story that lacks direction and to think that the writer said he took 6 years to layer most of the subplot is just ragebaiting. Unnecessary talk to feel important yet bad story telling.
Ultimately, it feels like a group of great actors trapped inside bad writing. There are flashes of potential here, but they are buried beneath far too much unnecessary storytelling. This should be a proper 1hr 30mins movie
Rating: 3/10 📉 #OrdinaryPeople
Ordinary People is an underwhelming viewing experience. Despite an interesting initial premise, the film collapses under the weight of its own convoluted, disjointed storytelling, resulting in a movie that feels like time-wasting.
3/10🧵
The excessive subplots, repetitive dialogue, inconsistent character logic, and uneven pacing make the story a chore to follow. Instead of building suspense, the series wastes time on detours and then rushes a messy final stretch and didn't give us the chance to really see Tonado