Ivan Pak

An independent soul in a chaotic world. my views are my own, politics are about facts not feelings, I am a believer of freedom. Proud Cdn! RT=\Ednsmt, A like is

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

This graphic is misinformation, full stop. It fundamentally misrepresents Canadian citizenship law and Bill C-3.

Canada has a first-generation limit on citizenship by descent. That means: a child born outside Canada is only a Canadian citizen if one parent was born in Canada or naturalized in Canada. That child cannot automatically pass citizenship to their own children if those children are also born abroad. Citizenship does not continue “forever” outside Canada. This is explicit in law and unchanged.

Bill C-3 did NOT remove this limit.
Bill C-3 corrected historic discrimination in old citizenship rules (mainly pre-1977 gender and legitimacy issues that stripped citizenship from some families). It did not create unlimited citizenship, mass inheritance, or “baby farms.” That claim is invented.

The benefits claim is also false.
Canadian healthcare, child benefits, and social assistance are residency-based, not automatic. You cannot live overseas and collect Canadian benefits. Citizenship alone does not entitle anyone to public benefits without residence.

Voting claims are misleading as well.
Only Canadian citizens vote, and voting is tied to legal eligibility and residency rules. There is no scenario where generations of people living abroad are “all voting and collecting benefits.”

What this image does is replace real policy discussion with fear narratives:
• ignores existing limits
• invents laws that don’t exist
• uses demographic panic language
• blames immigrants instead of debating actual immigration policy choices

Canada can — and should — debate immigration levels, enforcement, housing, and integration honestly. But spreading false claims about citizenship law doesn’t protect Canada; it undermines trust and poisons the conversation.

You don’t need fake laws to argue for policy reform. Stick to facts.

[VictoriaL59 @Victoria59L]

@stayfreeCanada2 Just like this

[黄淮 @kynkyn73670170]

港独分子代言人邵岚被德国记者怼到语无伦次，这段视频值得一看！

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@caijingshujuku 张冠李戴的视频也就如此了。你们这些人还没资格说中国。

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

Mixing legitimate concerns about foreign interference with extreme claims about “treason” and “dictatorship” weakens the argument. Canada absolutely should investigate foreign influence and protect civil liberties — but serious accusations need serious evidence, not fear-driven slogans.

[Yoyoi Ganta @YoyoiGanta]

@JanJekielek Funny how every decade there’s always a "China collapse tomorrow" guy yelling like a microwave with no food inside. Meanwhile China keeps building ports, trains, chips, EVs, and entire skylines while these pundits recycle Cold War fanfiction for clicks.

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@Jacob43817149 我反对台海两岸以战争来解决分歧，任何人与政府都反对。

[链条 @Jueshengshenlan]

八田与一在台湾期间，负责了台北下水道、高雄港，乌山头水库的工程。
其中，台南乌山头水库是其最主要的工程，当时是亚洲第三大水库，灌溉了台南、嘉义、云林近十万亩良田，台湾稻米产出一度提升300%
但这些大米却不属于台湾人自己，60%以上运回日本大本营，那个时代的台湾人大多以番薯渡日。

所以很明显，八田与一兴修水利并非为了台湾人，而是为了日本考虑。
他，以及日本，从来没有把台湾人当作自己的子民平等对待。
如果不是中国人民在抗战中击败了日本，令其无条件投降，让台湾得以光复的话，至今台湾人种出的大米，依旧不属于台湾人自己。
但这些历史，以及我们先辈的苦难，在贫穷落后的台湾南部，已经被洗的少有人记得。
唉。。。🥲

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

Why’s going on in Canada?

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@Jacob43817149 男人梦想。

[Voices for Fair Screening @VoicesFairCheck]

Starting today, we will be sharing footage from Vancouver rally. Through these real stories told by real people, we want to show you who we are and how our lives have been frozen by IRCC’s indefinite security screenings. First up: Opening remarks #IRCC #cdnpoli #cdnimm #CBCNews

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@Jacob43817149 @__Inty__ 他哪里说错了呢？你要把历史再往前翻。

[蔡子博士Chris @caiziboshi]

这个样本闻所未闻：两个土生土长的台湾人，移民加拿大打拼了三十年，现在放弃一切回到杭州，从零开始做自媒体。

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@Xiaobai77 @dakache01 我一早就认为这不是政治意识形态的问题。而是中国文化中的问题。

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@dakache01 @jeep_ai71364 有些人是想骂倒共产党。有些人却不介意骂好共产党。这是有本质区别的。

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@MoQiuyao201314 @zuoxiao2024 同样道理，外蒙谁丢的？

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@dakache01 @seanxu198236440 追求民主是一种艺术，你懂什么！哈哈。

[苏里格 @szslg]

https://t.co/cqHxfppDqz

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@Jacob43817149 这样的人在中国还能活成人上人，说明是那片土地的毒素堆积深厚。

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@DMillardHaskell Hmm…that means I can not run for the PPC for parliament. Got it.

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

@HandsomeP13 @ryangerritsen Does Canada recognize Taiwan as a sovereign nation?

[Ivan Pak @ivanpak8]

I actually agree with part of your point — the last couple of decades have shown poorly managed immigration and integration in many countries.

But that’s not the same as saying diversity itself is the problem.

Bad policy can produce bad outcomes in anything — housing, healthcare, or immigration. That doesn’t make the underlying idea inherently flawed.

The evidence isn’t “diversity always works” or “diversity always fails.” It’s that outcomes depend heavily on how it’s managed — selection, integration, incentives, and shared civic expectations.

Rejecting diversity outright is just as simplistic as assuming it works automatically.