Ph.D. student @ApEcMN: development, household, crime, dairy markets, and all else tbd. I was told #EconTwitter was a thing, but I needed to find out for myself.
This is something I need longer to digest. In any case, this result seems particular to this scenario where jobs were already receiving a high # of applicants.
Were there articles other people found interesting?
Link: https://t.co/2FKqY6kvhK
Reading the new NBER working papers for this week. There were 4 papers that caught my eye: 1st on COVID unemployment benefits, 2nd on the effect of having immigrant students in schools, 3rd on racial human capital disparities, & 4th on Chinese New Year and elderly suicide.
On identification, they allow for differential pre-treatment labor market trends. This violates parallel trends, but they claim that the actual identifying assumption is that w/o treatment outcomes would have evolved similarly in labor markets with different increases in benefits
If you’re a student and want a DD seminar on @agoodmanbacon and then @pedrohcgs and callaway, shoot me an email. First come first served up to some N tbd. I’ll then do a Google form. It’ll include directions on R code as well as easy simulations. I’m also good at intuition.
Every Monday I get an email with the latest NBER working papers. And in my ideal world I sit down with a cup of tea and read through these papers like I would the morning newspaper. Obviously, that never actually happens. 1/n
Franzoni & Stephan ask what risk-taking in science looks like, focusing on what can be found, if the method will work, the chance the outcome will be found, possible secondary findings, & its significance. As they argue, continuing a line of research doesn't imply risk avoidance
Migrants traveling through cartel territory in Mexico pay to secure a wristband that guarantees their safety. It removes one type of risk of migration, at a cost. Who will provide cheaper wristbands and how many will one need? Hope it's not a trend
https://t.co/49soipVoJy