@remitlysupport an attempt was made to scam me through your app. An account was made in my name and although I recognised the scamming effort, I believe they changed the password before was able to close the account. i want to avoid that this account will be used to scam others
So it appears Elon has turned off the satellites for Ukraine again. This will lead to more innocent deaths.
When will people realize he basically works for Putin?
BREAKING: In a stunning moment, Ukraine's President Volodomyr Zelenskyy just EXPOSED that someone in the Trump Administration or allied with Elon Musk is once again preventing Ukraine from using StarShield's technology. This in-kind contribution to Putin's war must be stopped.
Kremlin's chief negotiator after Abu Dhabi: "Every inch of our land will be returned to Russia, one way or another. Let European newspapers continue living in their world of illusions."
There is only one way to achieve peace: supporting Ukraine more. Talking to these mafia shitheads will not bring any peace to our continent. To the contrary.
Kremlin: "Wij gaan niet akkoord met de Europese eis mbt staakt-het-vuren in Oekraine."
Vredesbeweging die al jaren roept dat Rusland vrede wil en Europa aan oorlogskoorts lijdt:
Voila. Kremlin: "We zijn op de hoogte van de plannen van onze tegenstanders om de regio Kaliningrad af te snijden en te blokkeren. Niemand zou daaraan moeten twijfelen: pogingen om deze plannen uit te voeren zullen rechtstreeks tot een ramp leiden."
Today, I sent a letter putting New Jersey’s port and terminal operators on notice: importing Russian diesel violates federal law and could carry serious civil and criminal consequences.
New Jersey will not stand by while Donald Trump supports Vladimir Putin at the expense of Americans. Instead of lowering costs, these imports help finance Putin’s war against Ukraine and a campaign of violence and terror that endangers our servicemembers abroad.
As a Navy veteran, I cannot let that stand unchallenged. Our ports must not be complicit.
ABC News reporter Jonathan Karl interviewed the Secret Service agents who were with Trump the day of his “attempted assassination” — and they revealed things that should raise some red flags…
First, after Trump was “shot,” the agents immediately tackled them and told him to STAY DOWN as they piled on top of him — worried the bullet might keep coming.
Trump IGNORES them and, instead, starts wrestling against them to stand up so he can clench his fist towards the crowd and appear “tough” — putting his and all Secret Service agents’ lives in danger.
Then, when they’re safely in a car, one agent remembers Trump asking, “How did that look?”
An unusal first reaction to coming “within millimeters” of your death… 🤔
📸: ABC News
In July 2021, I warned in the Dutch media that completing Nord Stream 2 would sideline transit countries like Ukraine and give Putin free hands to launch military operations without jeopardizing Western Europe’s gas supply. Just months after that pipeline was finished, Russia proved that warning right by launching its full-scale invasion.
Now, the U.S. is reportedly pushing to restore Russian gas sales to Europe via Ukraine in hopes of unlocking an "energy ceasefire".
This proposal repeats the exact same strategic delusion that blinded Western policymakers for decades: the belief that energy interdependence can serve as a foundation for hard security (debunking this theory was the topic of my graduation btw)
Energy as a security fundament fails because authoritarian regimes do not view pipelines as mutual peace pacts, but as geopolitical weapons and a war chest.
When Putin wanted to isolate Kyiv before invading, he used Nord Stream 2 to bypass Ukrainian transit; today, routing gas back through Ukraine is simply a new way for Moscow to extract revenue and sanctions relief.
History has already shown that whether Russian gas flows around Ukraine or through it, pipeline diplomacy neither deters war nor protects sovereignty.
Lasting peace requires hard deterrence and energy independence, not rebuilding the very dependency that enabled this war in the first place.
Trump eases sanctions on Russia and begins buying Russian diesel. Days later, Musk restricts Starlink service in Ukraine, disrupting its military operations and its ability to defend itself.
And now we’re learning directly from Putin that Russia has been in contact with Musk.
How on earth did we get to this point? How is it possible that Musk can disrupt an American ally’s military operations whenever he chooses, maintain a clear line to the Kremlin, and face zero accountability to the American people or the U.S. government?
I want to know what Musk has been discussing with Russian officials, whether those conversations had anything to do with the Starlink disruptions, and what the Trump Administration knew.
Putin joins the First Lady in celebrating the Oleshky truce by slaughtering 14 unsuspecting civilians who were just waiting for their train in Dnipro today. https://t.co/BjRTVA4pnp
Kremlin: "We gaan niet onderhandelen met Europa"
Naïevelingen van de Vredesbeweging: "Waarom wil Europa niet onderhandelen met Rusland?!?!! OORLOGSKOORTS!!!"
Wow… Auf X sind alarmierende Nachrichten aufgetaucht. Wenn das stimmt, ist das ein Fiasko für Forrest Musk !!
Einer Untersuchung zufolge hat der Eigentümer von SpaceX einen Satelliten der USA und der NATO blockiert, um den Russen zu helfen, diesen nach dem Zusammenbruch der ukrainischen Luftabwehr abzufangen.
US-Forscher haben eine Tatsache aufgedeckt, die Musk sorgfältig verheimlicht und von der niemand etwas erfahren soll.
Es stellte sich heraus, dass SpaceX am 13. und 14. Oktober während eines massiven russischen Angriffs mit 39 Raketen und Hunderten von Drohnen nicht nur Starshield/Starlink eingeschränkt hat – wodurch die Abfangrate ukrainischer Drohnen um 23 % sank und sogar US-Personal in Kiew 48 Stunden später (am 15. Oktober) ohne Kommunikation blieb – sondern dass der Eigentümer von SpaceX zudem einen von den USA lizenzierten Orbitalradarsatelliten, ICEYE-X36 (der von der NRO, der US-Space Force und der NATO genutzt wird) und setzte seinen eigenen Satelliten ein, damit der russische Militärsatellit COSMOS 2612 diesen abfangen konnte (a-posteriori-Wahrscheinlichkeit von 99,89 %–99,98 %).
Das Pentagon, die US-Space Force und die NATO sind über diesen Verrat an den nationalen Interessen schlichtweg außer sich vor Wut.
Von nun an kann sich das US-Militär angesichts solch absurder Fehltritte nicht mehr auf die „Zusammenarbeit“ mit Musk verlassen oder sich sicher fühlen – ebenso wenig wie Partner aus anderen Ländern.
Bin gespannt, wie das wohl enden wird?
@EuromaidanPR
Idiotic European leaders can try anything they want, but as long as Putin is alive, the war in Ukraine is not going to end. As long as Putin is alive, the Kremlin will make fun of these bunch of European cowards. And yes, Putin is indeed going to escalate and attack the Baltics.
🇺🇦 Trump will, dass Putin diesen Winter den Krieg gegen die Ukraine gewinnt, sagt die US-Senatorin Elissa Slotkin.
Die Demokratin aus Michigan, früher bei der CIA und im Pentagon, weist auch die Version zurück, Musk habe Starlink allein gedrosselt: „Ich glaube keine Sekunde, dass Elon Musk diese Entscheidung einfach selbst getroffen hat." In den vergangenen zwei Wochen habe Trump gezeigt, wie nah er Putin steht. Er unternehme Schritte, damit Russland wieder Öl verkaufen und Geld einnehmen kann, und er störe Starlink. Für die USA nennt sie das einen riesigen strategischen Fehler.
Die Schritte selbst sind belegt. Im September unterschrieb Trump ein umfassendes Russland-Sanktionsgesetz. Am 9. Oktober lockerte sein Finanzministerium die Diesel-Sanktionen für sechs Monate, die erste so lange Lizenz seit Kriegsbeginn. Vom 14. Oktober bis zum Samstag war Starlink für die Ukraine gedrosselt. Laut Wall Street Journal hat Musk das selbst angeordnet. Eine Person aus dem Umfeld sagt, er habe vorher mit mehreren hochrangigen Regierungsvertretern gesprochen, auch mit Trump. Andere US-Beamte sagen, er habe allein gehandelt.
Für die Menschen in der Ukraine geht es um den Winter. Selenskyj hatte Trump am 28. Juli gebeten, mit Musk über Starlink zu sprechen, damit sich die Startplätze der ballistischen Raketen treffen lassen, mit denen Russland das ukrainische Stromnetz angreift (laut The Atlantic). Über Russland wurde Starlink nicht freigeschaltet. In der Ukraine wurde es gedrosselt.
Quellen: Grabien (Transkript), Wall Street Journal, AP, The Atlantic
“Do you understand who you are dealing with? This is America. Back up.”
A United Nations meeting was dramatically suspended yesterday after US ambassador Mike Waltz and Cuban foreign minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla both ignored the chair’s plea for order in the chamber.
The problem started when Waltz blamed Cubans for the shocking US embargoes and blockades that are causing huge suffering to the people of the island.
Cuban representatives, astonished at the way Waltz blamed the victims for the crisis, in their eyes, stood up and objected, citing Rule 71, which allows listeners to raise a point of order.
Ambassador Waltz responded that the Cubans didn’t like the substance of his speech, so were not raising a point of order.
But when complaints continued, this caused Ambassador Waltz to lose his temper and shout “Back up! Back away. Do you understand what you’re dealing with? This is America.”
.
INTERNATIONAL TERRITORY
The rest of the United Nations was outraged by this attitude, as the UN building is legally international territory.
When Waltz refused to stop his tirade, Khalilur Rahman, chair of the 81st session, ordered that the meeting be instantly suspended. Waltz ignored him.
The meeting was then resumed, but footage of the argument created a huge storm on social media.
Some people in the US defended Waltz’s narrative, blaming Cubans for the suffering caused by the US embargos.
But much of the commentary from the rest of the world said that the United Nations, for the safety of the delegates and the organization itself, should no longer be situated in New York.
When New York was originally chosen as the site, the US pledged not to politicize US visa access to meetings—but has regularly broken the pledge, such as refusing to allow visas for Palestinians.
.
.