@thekapman the reason why you make change every three years is because you get rid of a bad hire. Companies don’t survive that keep bad hires for long periods of time.
@sheanorling@doubleep12@thekapman The only equation to me is:
Caleb <> (Daniels/Maye) + Wash 2nd in 2024 + Wash 1st in 2025 (top 10).
Players bust all the time. I’m very curious about the right side of that math.
The best QB in a draft isn’t always the first taken.
Would not trade down past 3.
@thekapman George isn’t lying that no coaches ever asked him about a GM‘s contract length because every coach he’s interviewed is just thankful they’re even interviewing for the job. They aren’t serious head coaching candidates for any other team.
@thekapman the Bears are in the same place with Ryan poles like I told you they were with Eberflus six months ago. They either need to extend his contract or fire him. He cannot be allowed to make a coaching hire without a matching duration contract.
@thekapman You expect them to come up with the $5 billion they need to build in Arlington Heights? Seems like they need a partner who would finance the project without taking equity. Like the state government.
@LaurenceWHolmes@670TheScore You hit it. It's cash flow, it's liquidity. Finally someone said it. Glad to have you looking at this thing the right way.
The Bears really need someone in the family who, I dunno, went to an Ivy League business school who can tell them how to control all this uncertainty around the organization. Here's a book that would address this. Maybe the author has some ideas.
@thekapman Trading for a coach is an indictment of Poles. Trading for a coach means that he’s not capable of identifying a good coach. That means he’s not good at his job.
The only reason to trade for a coach is if your GM is not capable of doing a hire right.