@Sweetiebomb_Gmz@doggyscienceusa @Spitsworth @diamonddunnie@Boogie2988 Ao you told him before and then what? Felt compelled to keep telling him? Why? Did it bother you? If it was, you could have muted him.
You further my point you are a rude little troll on here.
@Sweetiebomb_Gmz@doggyscienceusa @Spitsworth @diamonddunnie@Boogie2988 No. You tried to have the last word and then block me. Not happening. Either finish the convo and admit defeat. Or stop commenting altogether and take the passive L.
Quite simple no?
@Sweetiebomb_Gmz@doggyscienceusa @Spitsworth @diamonddunnie@Boogie2988 You can block me right now. And never deal with me again. But if you comment trying to have the last word. I will continue to use alts until it is sufficiently clear to anyone. That you cause the problem. Embarrased yourself. And attempted to cover it up. Are you kink shaming?
@Sweetiebomb_Gmz@doggyscienceusa @Spitsworth @diamonddunnie@Boogie2988 Then act like an adult and block and move on. Trying to lie and manipulate the thread by commenting first leads to this outcome.
I have alot of account just for this. Because yall are used to getting your way. Not here. Not with me. You wanted to be an idiot now deal with it
@Whgenie Which is more likely and realistic. The breed of 75k is dangerously aggressive naturally based on 12 dogs.... Or the 12 situations in a 3 year period needs investigating as abuse was found in 9 of the dogs likely leading to the cause of the attacks.
@Whgenie In public without a muzzle** this meets everyone requirements btw if what they feel safe and unsafe about large breeds nit just pitbulls and bully breeds.
@Whgenie Muzzle in public is 1 way. I would say that anyone who owns a dog over 40lbs must have mandatory dog training 2 times a year, the dog must pass obedience school to be in public with muzzle and never off lead in public. This seems like an easy to implement solution. Thoughts?
@Whgenie Then by that logic rotties, huskies, and many other breeds should be banned if 0 is the acceptance. Issue comparing "all" dogs is like saying a tea cup poodle is infinitely less dangerous than a labrador. Why do we have labradors? The risk is too great in comparison.
@Whgenie I get that, and happy to have the discussion of 1 breed vs all breeds. But I'd like to fairly focus on just the breed we are discussing. Comparing the breed to itself. How can it be a breed that's the issue? And I'm the uk since 2000 there have been about 30 killings xl have not.
@Whgenie Well we can use the uk numbers. It's the same percentage wise. Of the 75k number you are using. A mere 5% would be 3750 killings. So from a logical stand point. The breed cannot be defined by what is just .0004% of the entire breed population. Do you agree or disagree?
@Whgenie Right I can agree to that number. And with let's say 6 killings a year even though since 2014 that's thr really the norm. But if it was. That's such a small percentage of the breed itself. I struggle with the actions of .004% of a population being what determines the character.
@Whgenie I personally struggle with the thought process. That a breed of dog in the millions (here at least) maybe kill 20 ppl a year. If it was the breed and now how it was raised in life. You would expect to see 5% or more which would be thousands a year. Just want your really thoughts
@Whgenie OK. Again take no offense not a gotcha moment. Just want to understand the other sides thoughts when they hear this.
1. If the breed itself is aggressive like most think. Why is it such a small number that attack humans and other animals?
@Whgenie Makes sense spaniels for some reason we're bred the wrong way. Very dog aggressive I know that's the pitbull line. But percentage wise spaniels were once very much seen as aggressive. Labs are just nippy but they aren't aggressive in an evil way.