Good morning Liz.
You seem to be unaware of a few things. Let us help you out here.
⚫️ As an EU member, around 27% of types of goods were able to be imported into the UK from fellow WTO members without a tariff applied - from outside the EU that level is now over 50%
⚫️ Food inflation since Brexit has been *lower* in the UK than it has in the EU, so food is cheaper in the UK
⚫️ As for the NHS, the NHS budget has been increased by over £750 Million a week since we left the EU
⚫️ As for UK global trade, the UK has trade deals in place with over 100 countries around the world, many of which are on the same or better terms than the EU had or indeed has
⚫️ In 2016 the UK exported a total of £582.6 Billion worth of goods and services - in 2025 that had increased to £930.6 Billion
You continue to talk about a topic that you appear to know absolutely nothing about - or perhaps you do, and so you simply lie to your followers in the hopes that they are too blinkered to fact check you.
Perhaps you could confirm whether it is ignorance or deceit that drives your posts of continued misinformation.
🚨BREAKING: SPECIALIST DOCTOR SAYS HENRY NOWAK COULD HAVE LIVED IF NOT FOR POLICE
In summary:
- Henry was alive when they arrived and likely clotted
- Aggressive police intervention likely tore clot
- Major Trauma department was minutes away from scene
- Judge and Pathologist were FAR TOO LENIENT on Police
- Henry Nowak had 50% CHANCE to survive
- Absolutely convinced that if he arrived in hospital alive he would have survived
This is disgusting, the family deserve justice
Full breakdown below:
Dr Krzysztof Magier [@DrMagier] based in the Isle of Wight is a qualified Paediatric Care Lead and part of the 'Critical Care Network' with experience in combat medicine training and a specialized course in treating severe injuries (including gunshot and stab wounds) has analysed the footage and claimed the AGGRESSIVE Police intervention may have contributed towards Henry's death.
Dr Magier DISAGREES with the pathologist's and judge's opinion that Henry Nowak had ZERO chance of SURVIVAL.
As well as the claim that handcuffing him essentially changed NOTHING.
In fact he claims the REVERSE IS TRUE, there is a high likelihood that the police intervention CONTRIBUTED TO HENRY'S DEATH.
He analysed the autopsy report, which points to DAMAGE to the subclavian vein as the main source of BLEEDING.
In a healthy person, venous bleeding occurs under low pressure and often self-limits thanks to the NATURALLY FORMING CLOT, while simply approximating the wound edges and compressing the surrounding tissues closes the vein enough to slow or even stop the bleeding.
The body camera footage shows that when police arrived on the scene (likely 5-10 minutes after the injury), Henry was CONCIOUS ENOUGH to speak LOUDLY.
He was therefore NOT YET in a terminal state.
After his arms were twisted behind his back and handcuffed, the vein was most likely STRETCHED, the clot TORN, and BLEEDING DRAMATICALLY INTENSIFIED.
Within just about three minutes, he lost consciousness and DIED.
People with suspected internal injuries should NEVER be moved or yanked abruptly, such actions can destroy the natural clot and lead to massive internal hemorrhage.
Instead of immediately calling a medical rescue team and handing the patient over to paramedics, the police ARRESTED HIM.
If paramedics had arrived first on the scene, Henry’s chances of survival would have been MUCH HIGHER.
AS HIGH AS "50%"—writes Dr. Magier.
Paramedics could have quickly started an IV, administered fluids to increase circulating blood volume, and tranexamic acid to stabilize the clot, and if needed, performed needle decompression (inserting a large, long needle into the lung), because the issue wasn’t so much lack of lung function, but compression of the blood-filled lung on the heart and mediastinum, which blocks circulation.
Worse still, the incident took place just a few minutes' drive by car (2–3 minutes by ambulance with sirens) from Southampton University Hospital—a regional MAJOR TRAUMA CENTRE equipped with a full team of specialists, procedures, and equipment.
"I AM CONVINCED THAT IF HENRY HAD ARRIVED THERE ALIVE THE DOCTORS WOULD HAVE NOT LET HIM DIE"—writes Dr. Magier.
The aggressive police intervention, instead of saving a life, led to death through improper handling of a severely injured person, even though world-class care was just minutes away. "I fear the Judge and pathologist were too lenient toward the police"
In Jan 2025 Starmer said @elonmusk's loud criticism of the Grooming Gangs coverup was a 'far right conspiracy theory'. Many SW1 NPCs like Lewis Whats Article 50 Goodall said it was his 'finest moment'.
But the 'conspiracy theory' was true and @elonmusk was right.
And he's right about the two-tier policing that Tories and Labour created deliberately. This is in black and white documents and HR departments and legal advice docs across the country.
Both parties were proud of it.
What's happened is the usual NPC vibe shift + Narrative Whiplash always = some glitches in the matrix.
Like -
Closing borders is bad >> Not closing borders is far right
Masks don't work >> Not wearing mask is far right
Vaccines impossible for covid >> opposing vaccines is far right
Grooming Gangs is a far right conspiracy theory >> We're starting an official Inquiry on Grooming Gangs
Putin blew up the pipeline, claims it was someone else are far right conspiracy theory >> Ukraine blew up the pipeline, Slava Ukraine!
etc etc
Sorry, Starmer. Division has already been whipped up in the UK by successive governments ignoring the express wishes of the electorate and allowing intolerable levels of immigration.
To try and contain that combustible situation, the establishment imposed “diversity” which put the native population at the bottom of the pile.
We can see how well that’s working out, can’t we?
Shabana Mahmood has CONDEMNED the Henry Nowak protests in Southampton, saying those responsible will be arrested.
Meanwhile, here she is on a pro-Palestine protest which turned violent and forced a supermarket to close.
She has since deleted this video. Please don't RT it.
More than 100 new datacentres in the UK plan to burn gas to generate electricity, some potentially doing so permanently.
▪️No net zero for the data centres.
▪️Net zero enforced on us plebs (probably to enable the data centres to burn more energy).
The whole thing is a scam.
I am a medical doctor and I can say clearly: this is not good enough.
Henry Nowak was murdered and the police let him die.
When someone tells you they've been stabbed and are struggling to breathe, unless they pose an obvious risk to your own life, you make sure they are OK before you do anything else.
You don't pause to think about whether they might be racist, or whether they could be making it up.
There must be justice for Henry.
🚨STARMER’S BLATANT HYPOCRISY EXPOSED! 🤔
Perfect example of Two-Tier Keir.
Video 1 (2020): Starmer viciously attacks Trump for his response to the rioters after George Floyd’s death, calling it an “affront to humanity” and defending the unrest as “peaceful protests” by people “rightly demanding justice”.
“Like you, I was shocked and angered by the killing of George Floyd. And the response of President Trump and US authorities to the peaceful protests, to people rightly demanding justice, has been an affront to humanity.”
Video 2 (Today): Starmer condemns the “disgraceful” rioters in the wake of Henry Nowak’s tragic murder and his shocking treatment by police.
“No matter the pain we feel, there is no justification for violence and disorder. Let me be clear, we will ensure anyone found engaging in disorder meets the full force of the law.”
Why the blatant double standard, Keir?
Either rioting is bad or it isn’t?
You’re “shocked and angered” and label Trump’s crackdown an “affront to humanity”… but now you’re cracking down hard when people “demand justice” after Henry Nowak.
Are you the “affront to humanity” for condemning these rioters?
Two-Tier Keir exposed for the world to see.
Yesterday, while political attention focused on the shocking Nowak case, Ed Miliband confirmed to Parliament what had long been expected. He said the Government intends to legislate for the Seventh Carbon Budget (CB7), committing Britain to cut emissions by 87% below 1990 levels by around 2040.
Under the Climate Change Act, ministers must legislate for the budget by 30 June 2026. Miliband has said the delivery plan will be published "as soon as reasonably practical".
Why does CB7 matter?
Politicians often sell Net Zero as simple substitution and "transition". Petrol cars become electric cars. Gas boilers become heat pumps. Aviation fuel becomes sustainable aviation fuel. Life then continues much as before but cleaner.
But the CCC’s own pathway shows something much broader and intrusive. It requires not only new technology and electrification, but managed changes in demand, diet, aviation, land use, industry and much more.
Aviation exposes the problem. Ministers can use the oldest rhetorical tricks in the book and claim that holidays are not banned, but the real question is whether flying becomes more expensive and restricted. With little evidence that SAF, electric flight or other innovations can decarbonise aviation at scale, demand growth will have to be limited using a mix of indirect and direct measures. As the CCC said in February, "Aviation demand can only grow if aviation sector technology roll-out progresses."
Diet follows a similar logic. Policymakers rarely dwell on meat and dairy, but the CCC pathway assumes lower meat consumption, fewer domestic livestock and land released from farming. Ministers haven't really started and yet we are already seeing the consequences. Milk, butter and beef are among the fastest-rising food categories, in part because UK policy has helped shrink domestic herds. Cow numbers have been falling by roughly 3% a year for the last decade.
This is why language matters. Sanitised terms such as "demand management", "low-carbon choices" and "land-use change" sound administrative. In practice, they mean state direction of ordinary life and a managed retreat from the freedoms of modern consumer capitalism.
Ed Miliband has been very explicit about this. In Go Big, his post-pandemic manifesto, he writes that the purpose of his climate mission is "to abandon this 300-year model of economic growth."
This is why the argument now comes down to trust.
For two decades, politicians like Miliband have told the public that the green transition would make energy cheaper and more secure. That promise has not survived contact with reality. In 2026, Britain has some of the highest power prices in the developed world. With so little spare capacity, we have also left ourselves more exposed to energy shocks, from the war in Ukraine to instability in the Middle East.
The next phase of Net Zero now reaches into family holidays, diet, farming and everyday freedom of movement.
Can we really trust the same political class that got energy costs so badly wrong to impose the next round of legally binding emissions cuts? They have failed to protect the public during the cost of living crisis. Why should anyone trust them to protect us from higher costs and taxes over the remaining 24 years of the "transition"?
The stakes at the next election could scarcely be higher.
The Prime Minister says “lessons must be learned” over the death of Henry Nowak.
He then goes on to say “there is no two-tier policing” despite being read a line by Nigel Farage, from the Police racism guidelines, which instructs officers to police unequally.
They don’t want to change anything. Let’s be clear.
When George Floyd died, they demanded change to policing in Britain. They got it. The change they got was to make the laws that saw Henry die without a shred of dignity.
You cannot hate this government enough.
If GB News did this to a left wing politician Ofcom would have raided the building by now.
Will the BBC be taken off air?
During a crucial byelection too.
"By 59% to 32%, the public backs lower taxes, lighter regulation, and private sector growth over redistribution and wealth taxes, including a majority (55%) of Labour voters."