@AyyooIcey@JBurke1924 In your way what would nothing? Because in the right way the original winner could double their win or the original loser would lose nothing.
@Kels757 It is the same. This is lunacy. If says it in the name
Bet 1
Player 1 -100
Player 2 +100
Double or nothing is same bet.
Player 2 wins he is +200 or double what they just won
Player 1 wins neither wins or loses anything. Or “nothing”
@NajiChill Just so wrong. You couldn’t get to nothing that way. $100 bet. I lost. Double or nothing. Meaning repeat the same bet if I lose I owe $200… or double. If I win we are both 1-1 in $100… or nothing. You see how easy this is?
@TomlinSteelers@StillrSuperBahl This pats team went up and down the field on us in this game. They had 5 turnovers. This was a blowout worse than yesterday that turned into a win because they couldn’t hold onto the ball
@TomlinSteelers And keeping him was a guarantee to never go anywhere. Tomlin isn’t absolved of blame because the new crew hasn’t turned around is mess in 2 weeks
@DjRodgers1231@OhioTate When you consider all he had to do to sleep on a bed was book a hotel room for his trip at some point in the last 6 months you he might be the victim of only himself
@yeaALA18@DrDaquavis@mymixtapez I just think it won’t get dismissed on DJ. The case is super super weak without that Pab charge. We could even see another superseding indictment to try and get other weak cases added to make up the gap. Probably why Durks team wants a speedy trial on VICAR.
@yeaALA18@DrDaquavis@mymixtapez I think you think I’m arguing something I’m not. I actually think we see the case the same way on a lot of issues. My only point is with federal precedent it likely won’t be dismissed on double jeopardy. Feds could drop. Steel will move to dismiss for sure.
@yeaALA18@DrDaquavis@mymixtapez This literally proves my point. Could it damage a case. Sure. Is it very damaging in this exact case. Absolutely. The feds played dirty with the superseding indictment in June. But it won’t get dismissed by double jeopardy which is my only point.
@yeaALA18@DrDaquavis@mymixtapez Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137 (1977) Google is free. Not sure why stating a fact is crying. This is just reality.
@DrDaquavis@mymixtapez There is precedent that if sever the charges that throws out double jeopardy. This is going to go to trial and will probably be a bigger mess than the last one.
@Thedoctor675@gerrydulac So Steelers fans have only complained when it pours the day before? Temple plays at the linc all the time. No issues. Miami plays at hard rock every game. No issues. Cheap ownership that doesn’t want to invest in a real playing surface is the issue. 25 years of this BS