@ItsMattsLaw The joke here is that “just looking at the law and applying it” is not even close to what most (good) lawyers are called on to do on any given day.
@paul_griffiths These are really great analogies and absolute the right conclusion (former banker-turned M&A lawyer who works with all these players)
@fintechfrank Double down - but in the right way. Focus on the long term, amazing use cases for blockchain, ditch the short term, get rich quick focus on price speculation
@VikaBot1 @LizCGil C’mon - if that’s real, that’s insane. no one actually gives a shit what your closing says. Simple rule: just mirror whatever was in the email you are replying to. Mirroring begets positive associations and you don’t have to think about it.
@VikaBot1 @LizCGil No one actually gives a sh!t what your closing is. So a simple rule: mirror whatever was used in the preceding email. Mirroring causes positive associations and you don’t have to think about what to use!
@LizCGil This is good advice. I used to fight with senior attys because my style may be different but that doesn’t make it wrong. Now I have to remind myself… BUT, lack of clarity and value-add in emails isn’t a stylistic difference
@msantoriESQ Need to look for the lawyers that tell you “how” instead of “no”. This is hard in any legal field and agree, crypto especially. But we are out there.
Gensler: thousands of dev teams can just come in and register as securities issuers, I don't know why they're not doing it
reality: SEC can't even keep up with traditional registration pipeline
https://t.co/cwpBp1yBA2
Dear writers of cold emails: It’s hard to get engagement, I get it. I give you a lot of credit for trying. But lying won’t get your targets to engage. Eg, you don’t already “work with several of my colleagues”. Focus on the value proposition instead.