LETS MAKE Ryley FAMOUS ❤️❤️
Nobody moved. So he did. ❤️❤️
Last Tuesday afternoon at a canal near a busy walking path, a toddler slipped through a gap in a railing and hit the water.
Adults froze. Seconds passed.
Then Ryley — 15 years old — took off his shoes and jumped in.
The water was deep. The child was too small to keep their head up. Ryley reached the toddler, got underneath them, and pushed the child's face above the surface. No flotation device. No lifeguard vest. Just a teenager using his own body as a raft.
He held that position — arms raised, treading water — until emergency responders arrived and lifted the child to safety.
Witnesses said he moved before most people had even processed what was happening.
Ryley went home that same evening. No press conference. No ceremony. He reportedly told his mum it "wasn't a big deal."
The toddler is safe. Recovering. Going home to their family.
And somewhere out there, a 15-year-old kid is probably back in school right now — sitting in class, doing homework — completely unaware that the world needs to know his name.
His name is Ryley 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👌🏾🙏🏾
Having written an open letter to the King calling upon him to honour his coronation oath as Defender of the Faith, the latest publication by the palace is completely unacceptable!
Tomorrow, I will make my address concerning this issue…and I’m not done asking the questions in my open letter…!!
I completely agree with everything he said. Those girls showed so much bravery by going to the police and then actually following it through.... only to then get a massive 'fuck you' from the patronising judge 🤬.
I don't care what colour the boys were, or what religion they were, or what group they belonged to, or what sort of upbringing they had, or even what their IQ was..... basic human nature should tell them that it isnt ok to gang rape a girl AND video it AND THEN share it for everyone to see. There are no excuses for their behaviour and they should be 100% in jail right now
The state moved at lightening speed to protect the Jewish community.
Meanwhile, the massacre of native Brits is treated as a mere inconvenience.
No million pound protections or national emergencies declared for us.
The establishment hate our guts.
🚨Islamists in Nigeria kidnapped 416 women and children three days ago.
They just issued an ultimatum and have begun executing the hostages.
Total media blackout in the West. No outrage, no coverage — just silence.
📣🚨The Free Speech Union is mounting a legal challenge against the Government over its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as 'anti-Muslim hatred' — and its appointment of a new 'tsar' to punish people who fall foul of it.
This amounts to a Muslim blasphemy law via the back door. The definition is vague and subjective, and will be weaponised to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history.
The FSU’s General Secretary, Lord Young of Acton, said: “This is the most serious threat to free speech the Government has come up with so far — the only area in which it’s achieving any success.
“If we don’t win this fight, tens of thousands of people a year could lose their jobs at the say-so of a Labour-appointed ‘tsar’. It’s dystopian.”
Public bodies will adopt this definition — despite it being non-statutory — with the same zeal the police have shown in investigating and recording non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs). It is predicted by one of the drafters of the definition that it could lead to around 20,000 reports of 'anti-Muslim hostility' a year. At present, the number of recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes is around 4,000.
In a free society, no religion should be shielded from legitimate criticism. This proposal places one faith above the rest.
The Free Speech Union is bringing a legal challenge on two grounds.
First, the definition relies on nebulous, legally undefined terms such as “negative and prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims”, making it incoherent and irrational — and ripe for weaponisation.
Second, adopting such a definition cuts across legislation already enacted by Parliament and therefore breaches the public law principle known as “occupying the field”. Under this established public law doctrine, new regulations, put in place by ministers, must not replace existing legislation. It is constitutionally unlawful. In this case, the body responsible for protecting Muslims from discrimination is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, not an anti-Muslim hostility 'tsar'.
Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws 18 years ago. We can't let this Government resurrect them via the back door.
This is one of the biggest battles the Free Speech Union has ever taken on in its six years — and we need your help. Judicial reviews are expensive, but this is a fight we felt we had to take on.
Donate to our crowdfunder below👇