Dr Jack Kruse

I am a neurosurgeon on a mission to create health from disease by decentralized thinking & BTC! Bitcoin pleb decade club in exile

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

1. Longevity in humans is linked to optimal solar exposure. The reason is simple. This protects the 7 layers of energy generation inside a cell. The more sun human gets the more diseases they can avoid and the #1 risk of most diseases is AGE.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@Charles04702910 @ValerieAnne1970 More will come out to light my friend

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@crysdale @ValerieAnne1970 @MaryLaVeau1 I keep saying this always

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

https://t.co/OWC6YwBIUo

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

https://t.co/lFEHpdK9sm

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@Tfinch @ProjectGokuu Wired

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@CFAnon69 @ProjectGokuu @grok Now you see is the truth

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@laurelmmmmm Nature designs birth as a decentralized masterpiece light, hormones, and instinct. The medical impulse to invade with shots and knives often ignores that wisdom.
Honoring it at home, free of the chaos, respects the system. Well done.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Take everything with a grain of salt, including mine.
Real science shows chemical sunscreens (oxybenzone etc.) damage reefs and disrupt human skin biology plenty of studies since the 80s. Read them yourself.
Clothing, smart timing, and building tolerance remain the cleanest path.

[Elderly Gentleman @ElderlyGentlem1]

@NicHulscher It’s “grain of salt” time. I do not use sunscreen and have concerns over the chemicals involved but, if you don’t include a link to the actual scientific study, all you’re doing is posting click bait. I would reserve judgement until reading the study.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Oxybenzone didn’t just appear in sunscreen it entered marine ecosystems. By the late 1980s and 1990s, researchers were already raising concerns about its effects on coral health. Coral reefs don’t thrive under chronic chemical stress.

[Jrbenlo @jrbenlo]

@NicHulscher Sunscreen with oxybenzone kills coral reefs...reports from the 1980s when it first became popular.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Epidemiological studies on sunscreen are deeply flawed because they completely ignore solar geometry and confounding variables like overall lifestyle. They blame the sun while missing the true culprit: modern nn-EMF, deuterium, and toxic seed oils destroying our cellular redox.

[Independent Normie @full_of_win_]

@NicHulscher I do not believe that the researchers adequately controlled for sun exposure to establish the claimed "link" between sunscreen and skin cancer.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Exactly. That solar callus you've built over 70 years is real quantum biology. Your mitochondria adapted to the photons. A little actinic keratosis is just a localized energy mismatch, not a death sentence. Nature designed us to live under the sun, not hide from it.

[Silas Deed @SilasDeed]

@NicHulscher Have spent 70 years in the desert and not once put on sunscreen. Freeze a spot on my face every year or two. I will take my chances with the sun

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Correlation is not causation. Most people wearing sunscreen are already at the highest UV risk or have prior skin damage. The real issue isn’t the sunscreen it’s the mismatch between your biology and your light environment. Fix the light first, use clothing wisely

[José @bartpascoal]

@NicHulscher I use sunscreen because I am already high risk skin cancer. I may be fighting fire with fire but I have no alternatives than wearing long sleeve shirts. My point is that the correlation doesn't mean causation. I may get skin cancer regardless of the sunscreen.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Blocking the spring sun robs your skin of the gradual UV signaling needed to build natural solar callus. When you miss a spot in summer, your unadapted skin gets fried. Nature designed spring to safely prime your mitochondria—interfering with that rhythm invites disaster.

[J may @Jhmay03]

@NicHulscher Although it might be related to the chemicals, my theory is people use it in spring, so don’t get healthy tan, then in summer, forget to use it one time and get deep burns. Only use in spring when you will get large exposure.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Charlie we lack sun light everybody is running to get vaccinated

[Charlie Barkley @CostofLiving2Hi]

@NicHulscher Why do Asians, who most are as fair-skinned as many whites, account for only 1% of annual skin cancer diagnoses in the US and whites 95%??? Because 60% of whites use sunscreen regularly and only 15% of Asians.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

I am so sorry for your loss. Your intuition is spot on. Melanoma is a disease of mitochondrial failure and toxic chemistry, not natural sunlight. Chemical sunscreens block vital UV-B while flooding your cells with endocrine disruptors. Trust your truth.

[Anna Jones @BellaAnnaJones]

@NicHulscher yeah, I got kicked out of a dermatologist's office because I expressed the opinion that sunscreen caused skin cancer - specifically melanoma, because my husband died of melanoma and he always used sunscreen.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

Madness. Winter sun is low angle, meaning you miss out on crucial UVB for Vitamin D and immunity. Slathering chemicals blocks the healing light you desperately need in the cold months. Nature designed winter light to build your resilience ditch the lotion and let your biology win

[Hohmeswehrumaekt @Hohmeswehumaekt]

@NicHulscher The media pushes sun screen during the winter. Sickening

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@de_fully @NicHulscher Exactly. If “inadequate use” explained the link, non-users should have the highest cancer rates. They don’t. Melanoma often strikes less-exposed skin, and rates rose with sunscreen sales. Sun is medicine.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@Stephen28942763 @NicHulscher It's heartbreaking... and interestingly, about 70% of cancers are believed to be caused by a lack of sunlight and overexposure to vaccines.

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@Marlonvb @NicHulscher Epidemiology without biophysics is just a guess wrapped in statistics. The real issue isn't the cream or the user; it's that artificial blue light destroys your redox potential from the inside out, making your skin vulnerable to UV light in the first place. Fix your light..

[Dr Jack Kruse @jackkrus_s]

@anthony28667 @NicHulscher Chemical filters are endocrine disrupting xenobiotics that alter your systemic redox state when absorbed into the bloodstream. Mineral barriers like zinc oxide sit on top and reflect, but nothing replaces building your solar callus naturally through proper redox signaling.