On a packed train with my family. Couple across the aisle both alternatively playing social media videos on speakers at full volume. Managed not to say anything until the woman started playing a documentary about serial killers. I'm here with my daughter.
I politely said "please could you turn it down it's not appropriate." To which she replied "I'm sure she's heard worse at school." I said that really wasn't her call to make and in general could she please reduce the volume.
Her response "Its a public train for heavens sake".
For me that's exactly why it is anti social (and what headphones were invented for). I'm wondering which one of us is out of kilter on this?
Ps I should note she did thankfully reduce the volume and we all left it there.
@wildzilla11@paniniboy7 Pointless exercise for all - don’t think Arsenal want any retrospective trophies or anybody else
Sets a precedent that could catch any club out in future
@thEnd0fTheStorm@CelticBTN Well it clearly is that difficult if the figure isn’t readily available and inferring the drop is down to merch sales over a failed fan initiative
Whether the revenue dropped because of not another penny is almost irrelevant, it was to force change (which nothing did)
@CelticBTN No I’m taking the objective facts and applying them where they fit nicely into the face value results as opposed to you looking for answers where they don’t exist
The focus on the boycott being silly is because it was about forcing change but the objective failed
@CelticBTN I’m saying all the figures are available across financial years so you can contrast the revenue fluctuations
The champions league sized drop in revenue is what it looks like - trying to see the impact of ‘not another penny’ is silly (esp when it was meant to out the board)
@CelticBTN Yeah but there’s changes to the allocation of them all
Commercial / sponsorships would have been inflated by champions league involvement too