LegitPanda

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@Softwave71 @messedupfoods The lobby always closes like at least an hour before it closes btw, you gotta use the drive thru. Idk if you tried that too tho

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@ekene_xander @FunWithAi444 @CreationsRoss Every person in the video laughed about what he did, but the last one who was black saw it did not laugh and shook their head in disapproval? Not hard to assume they thought it wasn’t a joke since it’s more stereotypical to be afraid of black people.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@siren_of_shadow @realericmoutsos It’s due to the length of the camera exposure. When they took a long exposure pic the earth was very dark in the night and you could just see the cusp of light from the sun coming around along the atmosphere. The lighter pic was taken with low exposure minutes apart to look good.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@lostinganglia @realericmoutsos lol these ppl have never heard of the thinking option they just put everything in on fast mode so it will take on their opinions more and mess up more lol. Ai on fast mode is excruciatingly bad

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@ManicMi87418204 @kova2066 @realericmoutsos They both were taken minutes apart. The dark one is long exposure and the second is short. If you knew anything about cameras and exposure it would make sense. Anyone talking about the pic being fake because the lighting doesn’t match doesn’t know what they are talking about lol

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@SandK123 @Zo_04 @_TruthZone_ You would need much much more energy to go in a straight line up. They go sideways along the orbit of the earth so they fall around the earth rather than back down. It’s a bit the same how they are going to slingshot around the moon and back using the moons orbit to flip around.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops I think the reason it’s giving different asnwers is when you search how much for $1 because this says 3,500 for $1 then also 3,500 for 1 ounce (valued at $2000) so it’s already contradicting itself and I see that and search a different search. Not a big deal, ai messes up a lot.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops Got 15m “so you’re wrong and I’m right!” I literally just was trying to point out it was a wrong calculation. Not that serious bro. You are the one that’s like trying every way to be right since you were wrong in the start I literally do not care at all I was just correcting.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops Whatever bro. Literally was not the point at all being right you just were arguing that was I said is wrong “based on context” which I was not trying to be in context at all I was just trying to state it’s not 15m. Like it’s not a big deal you calculated “the wrong one” and 1/2

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops Notice how this says 9.5m for MODERN cards? Can you understand now why I thought 15m would be a modern calculation since it’s such a high number even more than actual modern ones would take?

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops When I search for it being 15m it says this

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops It can still be relevant to your comment since I making sure other people know it’s not 15m it’s much less than that. I understand you were calculating based on the screenshot. I was not using the screenshot and was basically correcting the screenshot but replied to you.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops Bro the whole point of my first comment was that I wasn’t taking the screenshot as fact…. You are stuck on it being in context I was literally saying I looked it up and the search is wrong it wouldn’t be 15m cards it would be 400,000 to 1m cards that’s all I was ever saying.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops It can insinuate it either way… the only reason it’s one way or the other is because it says “500 to 1000 OLDER SIM cards” literally just skimmed and missed that one word and you are stuck on it lol. Old ones having more gold and modern having less gold still means the same

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops No I assumed it saying that meant it was calculating modern cards and it was iterating that older cards would have more gold in them since it was based on modern in my head. But either way that has nothing to do with what my first comment was about….

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops Older ones have more gold which means the exact same thing. I was never saying that to start I only brought it up bc you corrected me on it when it means the exact same thing. Like you understand modern using less gold and old using more gold is the same phrase right?

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops The phrasing means nothing there’s nothing to argue about with phrasing. You are thinking I’m confused about that when I’m not and you keep going back to what it says. I am not talking about which has more gold. I simply said that bc you said no modern ones have less gold not 1/2

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops I’m not saying you are wrong about 15m bc it’s 14.5m…. I’m saying the whole calculation you are using is wrong. It would be 400,000 to 1m cards and you got caught up in me talking about what has more gold or whatever else you could be confused about.

[LegitPanda @jacob_roleman]

@nasrc013 @Salsagadgets @iamBigChops Bro. That is not what I’m talking about whatsoever. I’m saying the calculation you are using is wrong. Has nothing to do with that I missed the older part. Has nothing to do with the post saying modern ones have less gold. I was trying to help people see it’s not 15m it’s 400,000