> "We need immigrants for our economy"
> Britain is almost Bankrupt
> "We need immigrants for the NHS"
> The NHS is on the verge of collapse
> "Immigrants will improve our culture"
> Rape gang, spitting in the street, defecating in the parks, eating the swans
The cousin marriage gag is not because he's brown, it's because he's Muslim. Even in her sanctimonious pearl-clutching she frames it to try to obscure the reality.
Immigration should be about what is best for the country, not what's best for the immigrant. We have no obligation to foreigners. Their country being in shambles is not our problem, and it is not our responsibility to save them.
This argument is absurd on its face. Should I open my private home to a homeless person on the street because they "deserve a better life?" Of course not.
Comparing liberal immigration laws to ending slavery is just abhorrent and offensive.
Reform has just labelled Russia our 'number one enemy’.
Restore Britain disagrees. We have many enemies, but our main threat is organised, radical, political Islam.
An ideology, already spread, that will end democracy and replace our way of life with oppressive religious rule.
In 2025 total arrival of immigrants dropped by 19.7% to 813,000, from 1,012,000 in 2024
That is still 154% of what is was at it's peak during Tony Blair's time in office.
We have sustained 29 years of mass immigration. To the point where only 52% of the babies born last year were White British. But leftists will look at that one drop (in isolation) and say "why hasn't everything suddenly gotten better? See immigration isn't a problem."
By 2063 white British people are projected to become a minority in their own country.
That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s what the numbers show when you combine mass immigration with collapsed native birth rates.
The Muslim population is projected to nearly triple. And right now the most popular boys name in Britain is Mohammed all while Britain has MORE Sharia councils than the REST OF EUROPE COMBINED.
If that doesn’t wake people up, nothing will.
And if you point any of this out, you’re the problem.
This is not a conversation we can keep putting off. The clock is already running.
Either we wake up and reverse course now, or our children inherit a country that no longer looks like the one we were given.
Britain is not a hotel.
WE DIDN’T VOTE FOR THIS.
In 1984, Tom Parsons is arrested for thoughtcrime after his young daughter hears him mutter "Down with Big Brother" in his sleep and reports him.
A private utterance. A child the only witness.
The state calling it a crime.
Orwell meant it as a warning.
This is the reality we live in today.
Make no mistake we are living in a totalitarian state.
📣🚨 FSU VICTORY!
A Scottish FSU member was driving on the M80 with his four-year-old son after a day at an amusement park when another car cut him up, nearly causing a collision.
Under his breath, he muttered something racist. The windows were down, but the other driver wasn’t looking at him. The only witness was his young son in the back seat.
Convinced the dangerous driver had been drinking, our member contacted the police. They eventually stopped both cars and reviewed his dashcam footage.
A week later, the police contacted him to say that an offence had been committed — not by the dangerous driver, but by our member, for words he had muttered under his breath in the privacy of his own car.
He was prosecuted for allegedly causing alarm and distress, even though only he and his young son were in the car. It is extraordinary.
The Free Speech Union found him an excellent barrister, and he was acquitted by the Justice of the Peace within minutes.
This is the closest we have come to defending someone prosecuted for thought crime.
This is the extent of police overreach in speech and thought policing. They need to get their priorities straight.
Watch the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary, Lord Young, below 👇
📣🚨 FSU VICTORY!
A Scottish FSU member was driving on the M80 with his four-year-old son after a day at an amusement park when another car cut him up, nearly causing a collision.
Under his breath, he muttered something racist. The windows were down, but the other driver wasn’t looking at him. The only witness was his young son in the back seat.
Convinced the dangerous driver had been drinking, our member contacted the police. They eventually stopped both cars and reviewed his dashcam footage.
A week later, the police contacted him to say that an offence had been committed — not by the dangerous driver, but by our member, for words he had muttered under his breath in the privacy of his own car.
He was prosecuted for allegedly causing alarm and distress, even though only he and his young son were in the car. It is extraordinary.
The Free Speech Union found him an excellent barrister, and he was acquitted by the Justice of the Peace within minutes.
This is the closest we have come to defending someone prosecuted for thought crime.
This is the extent of police overreach in speech and thought policing. They need to get their priorities straight.
Watch the Free Speech Union’s General Secretary, Lord Young, below 👇
In Germania vivono 39 mila giapponesi con solo 2 crimini commessi. In Italia vivono 330 mila cinesi con soli 7 crimini commessi. In Italia vivono 5,6 milioni di Musulmani con 3,7 milioni di crimini gravi commessi. Abbiamo importato criminali. Chest’é.😤