China serves as a profound model that helps us understand exactly why developing nations have repeatedly struggled to build functional democratic institutions.
This is especially true when you consider that most of these nations were violently plundered and colonized, with the vast majority of their populations deliberately denied access to education. Western liberal democracy is structurally destined to fail in these environments because the impoverished masses, left to their own devices, are not equipped with a systematic understanding of political economy, statecraft, institutional mechanics, or the geopolitical maneuvers of global empires.
By design, the electorate will rarely vote based on competence to elect visionary leaders capable of transforming the country. The political elite understand this perfectly. This is why they perform on stage like comedians to win cheap public approval, weaponizing religion and ethnic jingoism to divide the masses and secure blindly loyal voter bases.
Even in the rare instances where strong, revolutionary leaders manage to emerge from this broken system, it is remarkably easy to undermine or topple their regimes. Because the general public cannot understand or endure the painful, short-term structural reforms required to push the country in the right direction, foreign intelligence agencies find it incredibly easy to label these leaders as brutal dictators, funding opposition groups to rally the masses against their own liberation.
Vanguard party doctrines, such as those utilized by the Communist Party of China, were designed specifically to bypass the fatal weaknesses of liberal democracy. They achieve this by placing governance firmly in the hands of a disciplined, ideologically rigorous, and intellectually trained elite.
In this context, Marxism is not merely about anti-capitalism or rallying the working class to seize the means of production. It is a highly structured defensive mechanism that guarantees the state and the material interests of the people are protected from being hijacked by both domestic opportunists and foreign imperial threats.
Under this system, the state does not collapse into a corrupt cesspool where local politicians hijack security agencies and public resources to accumulate personal wealth. Furthermore, it prevents the nation from devolving into a capitalist hellscape where predatory corporations capture politicians and regulators to amass endless profits at the direct expense of the general public.
All of this systemic madness is kept in check by a ruling party of professional revolutionaries. Because these cadres are rigorously trained in philosophy, dialectical materialism, and political economy, they are uniquely equipped to act as the central nervous system and the intellectual "brain" of the society.
Because these leaders do not need to participate in periodic popularity contests, spend billions on campaign marketing, or pander to the lowest common denominator in the name of democratic elections, they have the political security to govern effectively. They can implement long-term, painful structural plans like rapid industrialization, massive literacy campaigns, and state-led modernization without the constant fear of being voted out by a reactionary electorate seeking short-term comfort.
This is precisely why China continues to grow and develop at an almost impossible, exponential scale, while post-colonial nations across Africa and Latin America remain paralyzed, impoverished, and politically toothless.
China refused to bail out the Evergrande CEO because he crossed the three red lines established by Xi Jinping.
These three red lines are a practical application of dialectical materialism, which the Communist Party of China employs to arrest unchecked capitalism. Here is what they entail: