@YusufDFI She will have a career only in spreading anarchy. When you go in and unrest, expect to be beat up. We have seen stones being hurled at police, lot of vandalism, anti India slogans. She joined bad company. Now she will be groomed by leftist activists and taken advantage of by them
When looking strictly at the ancient texts of India (the Puranas, Epics, and Vedic literature ), a deeply rooted indigenous worldview ancient India emerges. The concepts of the Lunar Dynasty, the Bharat tribe, and the geographical definition of Bharata are explicitly and extensively recorded in these texts.
1. The Lunar Dynasty (Chandra Vamsha or Indu Vamsha)
In Samskrutm, Indu (इन्दु) means the moon. The ancient texts do indeed record that the region's prominent ruling lineages were divided into two main cosmic dynasties: the Surya Vamsha (Solar Dynasty) and the Chandra Vamsha / Indu Vamsha (Lunar Dynasty).According to Puranic genealogy, this lineage originates from Soma (the Moon God, also called Indu).His son was Budha, who married Ila. Their son, Pururavas, was the first historical king of the Lunar Dynasty.This dynasty is central to the history of ancient India; it gave rise to the major clans that shaped the sub-continent's early narrative, including the Yadavas, the Pauravas, and eventually the Bharatas.
2. The Bharat Tribe and King Bharata. The Rigveda frequently mentions the Bharatas as a prominent, noble Vedic tribe (Jana). They played a pivotal role in the famous Battle of the Ten Kings, led by King Sudas, which established their spiritual and political prominence in the region.Later, the Puranic tradition explicitly attributes the name of the nation to a single, legendary monarch, the Emperor Bharatha, the son of King Dushyanta and Shakuntala, and a direct descendant of the Indu Dynasty. Bharata became a Chakravarti (a universal, crowned emperor) who unified the entire subcontinent under one righteous rule. The texts explicitly state that the land changed its name from Ajanabha Varsha to Bharata Varsha in his honour.
3. The Geographical Definition of Bharata
The ancient texts do not treat Bharata merely as a vague cultural concept; it define its geographical boundaries with incredible precision, explicitly mapping it from the Himalayas down to the southern ocean.The most famous definition comes from the Vishnu Purana (Book 2, Chapter 3, Verse 1):
उत्तरं यत्समुद्रस्य हिमाद्रेश्चैव दक्षिणम् ।
वर्षं तद् भारतं नाम भारती यत्र संततिः ।।
("The country that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhāratam; there dwell the descendants of Bharata.")
This exact boundary is repeated across multiple texts:
The Mahabharata (Bhishma Parva): Describes the land mass in detail, listing its sacred rivers, mountains, and provinces, framing it as a distinct geopolitical and spiritual entity bounded by the seas and the Himalayas.
The Vayu Purana and Matsya Purana: Confirm these exact geographical limits, explicitly noting that the southern ocean forms the natural boundary of this realm.
Flipping the Narrative:
When external writers like Ibn Battuta focused on the term "Hindu Kush" as a reflection of conflict and captives, they were documenting a specific, violent snapshot of medieval Islamic invasions. However, thousands of years before those invasions, India's own literature had already codified a sophisticated identity based on cosmic lineages (the Indu Vamsha), a foundational, unifying lineage (the Bharatas), and a clear sacred geography defined by the natural frontiers of the Himalayas and the great southern ocean. These indigenous records show that the country's ancient identity was never defined by extraneous groups, but rather by spiritual unity, civilisational continuity, and righteous kingship of Emperor Bharatha.
If you actually want to understand what Punjab terrorism was like - in raw honesty & nuance - brutality of Khalistanis & excesses of police with ordinary Punjabi stuck in middle - watch this one interview. I believe it’s a great feat in Indian journalism.
My man is Devendra Fadnavis.
My man is the current CM of Maharashtra.
My man is the current Home Minister of Maharashtra.
My man has zero control on Jihadis.
My man did nothing on TCS.
My man did nothing on Jalna.
My man did nothing on the Dongri police Islamic flag issue.
My man allows Namaz on Bandra station but no Jagannath Yatra in Malad🤡
My man is with Riyaz Aly 26 million+ followers.
My man invited him home.
My man and his family clicked nice pictures.
My man’s wife made a viral reel with Riyaz.
In my words, I call this promotion of Love Jihad from the CM’s office or Hypocrisy !!
What do you think ?
@SlathiaAbhinav@megirish2001@mygovindia@adgpi The wife had been together with him for 8 years but married for only short time, I think 6 months. Mother came on television saying it was only 6 months marriage, bahut has run away. It was a terribly tragic time for parents. But they could hv maintained dignity, the wife did
Nanak ji, the Guru opposed rituals, preached essence of One God. ‘Jahan Tahan mein Ram basaa”
Every ardas starts with “Pratham Bhagoti simar ke..” (to remember Ma Bhagwati first).
At ‘Mecca’ he told the moulvi to turn his feet in the direction where the God doesn’t exist, when pointed out that his feet were towards the shrine.
Every Hindu family gave first son to be a Sikh to fight moguls. I come from same family & am proud of it.
Little knowledge is always dangerous.
AajTak has broadcasted ARCHIVES from Iftar & Roza right inside Hanuman Garhi!🤯
Deities’ images covered with cloths like some dirty secre.
Avimukteshwaranand is screaming like a paid Samajwadi troll: "When did namaz happen at Hanumangari?"
Neutrality died long ago bro.
- Murshidabad riots? ‘Not Hindu-Muslim issue.’
- Beef ban drama to defame Yogi when it’s already banned?
Come out as a candidate openly next year instead of hiding behind Bhagwa!🤡
If no namaz happened, why did the COURT impose the ban?
Why did Mahant Gyan Das ji have to stop Roza-Iftari in this sacred complex?
Hypocrites supporting sin in a Hindu temple. Enough of this drama of tolerance!
Jai Shri Ram! 🚩
Ultimate bad journalism is pretending that public welfare becomes illegitimate simply because you dislike the ideological leanings of the volunteers delivering it.
The latest attempt to sensationalize ONGC's CSR allocations is a textbook example of shifting the goalposts. Let's look at the facts instead of the headlines.
First, the premise itself is flawed. The RSS, as a voluntary socio cultural movement, is not the legal recipient of these funds. Organisations such as Sewa Bharati, Ekal Vidyalaya and other affiliated institutions are independently registered trusts and societies with their own governing bodies, statutory registrations, PAN numbers and audited accounts. They are separate legal entities fully eligible to implement CSR projects.
Second, this is not discretionary political funding. Under Section 135 of the Companies Act, CSR spending by a Maharatna PSU like ONGC is governed by a strict legal framework. Funds are tied to approved projects, monitored throughout implementation and subject to statutory audits. If hundreds of crores had genuinely been siphoned off, regulators and auditors would have flagged it years ago. They haven't.
Third, ask where the money actually went.
A significant allocation funded the Swargadew Siu Ka Pha Multi Speciality Hospital in Assam, a 300 bed tertiary care hospital empanelled under Ayushman Bharat that serves tea garden workers, tribal communities and rural families. Other funds support Ekal Vidyalaya's schools in remote tribal regions and Sewa Bharati's hostels, health centres, disaster relief operations and community welfare programmes.
These are measurable outcomes, not political slogans.
There is a reason PSUs partner with such organisations. They have decades of experience delivering services in villages, tribal belts and border districts where many others simply do not operate. Development is not about announcements. It is about execution.
Demand accountability. Demand transparency. Demand better governance.
But branding legally compliant, independently audited CSR partnerships as "criminal" simply because you dislike the ideological ecosystem of the implementing organisations is not journalism. It is ideological prejudice masquerading as investigative reporting.
Your real target was never financial accountability. It was an ideology.
In the process, you are asking people to oppose hospitals treating the poor, schools educating tribal children, hostels housing underprivileged students and disaster relief reaching those in need, simply because you dislike the volunteers behind them.
If narratives like yours succeed, it will not be an ideology that pays the price. It will be lakhs of ordinary Indians who depend on these schools, hospitals and welfare programmes.
Before weaponising journalism to wage an ideological battle, ask yourself one question. Do you even understand what it is you are trying to destroy?
@hkkrishnaa@DeepikaBhardwaj Anyone who thinks it is a bad bargain, shouldn't get married. But the truth is people sell land, take out loans just to marry of their daughters. Then turns out the guy cannot hold on to a job, gets drunk, does battery. The woman ends up back with her father. Not worth it
@Pandaman_50@DeepikaBhardwaj That money is in addition to the dowry, not in leu of. And while they give it to the bride in front of the guests they take it back when the bride reaches her in-laws house at the pretext of safe keeping. Then it is never seen again.