I too have learned since 10/7 that people will say anything to smear Israel and the Jewish people. Even in America, even in the Republican Party, even so called conservatives.
It’s such low IQ brain rot that no matter how much I see it, it shocks me.
Everyone should listen to this video.
The legitimacy of the case against the Islamic republic is first and foremost rooted in the demands of the Iranian people inside Iran, who have repeatedly risen up, most recently in the millions, to demand an end to this regime. In this movement, there has been only one name they have called for, and only one transitional leadership the Iranian people have fought for: @PahlaviReza.
Now that doesn’t mean every Iranian is a monarchist, and it doesn’t mean “restoring monarchy” either. If fact, Pahlavi himself has called for a transition to democracy and has only ever called for a transition leadership. Many people are calling for Pahlavi today who did not support the Shah in the past. The world is still talking over them.
Instead of listening to the Iranian people, the international media and multiple governments around the world have consistently proposed plan after plan, actively ignoring the will of the Iranian people. They have minimized and in some cases even mocked the Crown Prince, when he and he alone has the ear of the people on the ground. There have been well funded and coordinated efforts against the Crown Prince attempting to cast doubt on his popularity with the Iranian public and to spread rumors that anyone who supports him as a traditional leader is “restoring monarchy”. He has been accused of all sorts of absurdities from being an “Israeli agent” to being asked to answer for political decisions of his father that have nothing to do with him and still he has maintained the respect and support of the Iranian people.
This is a cataclysmic mistake on the part of the West. Iran is not Afghanistan or Venezuela. You will never have a successful foreign imposed leader like the terrorist Ghalibaf when the people are calling for something else entirely.
How many times must the West repeat the same mistakes over and over against expecting different results?
@Suffragent_ Hang on. 17 Sept, 1993 makes him 15? Have I missed a memo about new rules for maths?
That aside, interesting how gentle and respectful the cops are to him.
@sorcuruk@BGatesIsaPyscho Plus destroyed small businesses; greatest transfer of wealth in history; spread propaganda; brainwashed hundreds of millions; culled elderly and vulnerable; rolled out phase 1 digital IDs; built global database (DNA via testing). And more.
Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.
https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4
Twee pleegvaders (Mathias en Steven) die hun jongetjes van 7 en 10 seksueel misbruikten, camera's ophingen in de kinderkamer, zichzelf en elkaar aftrokken terwijl de kids erbij waren, kinderporno maakten én hun hond misbruikten...
En die monsters hoeven niet de cel in?! Voorarrest was genoeg, 240 uur schoffelen en een voorwaardelijk jaartje.
De rechters houden rekening met de "parafiele/zoöfiele stoornis" van die twee onmensen.
Omdat ze pedofiele en zoöfiele gevoelens hebben, rekenen ze de verkrachting van die jongetjes van 7 en 10, het maken van kinderporno en het misbruiken van de hond "in licht verminderde mate" toe.
WAT EEN WAANZIN.
Waarom zou je bij een pedoseksueel rekening houden met het feit dat hij pedofiele neigingen heeft?! Dat is toch precies de reden waarom hij die kinderen nooit in huis had mogen krijgen?!
"Ja edelachtbare, ik heb een stoornis waardoor ik kinderen seksueel wil misbruiken.. dus geef me maar minder straf."
Slachtoffertjes verwoest voor het leven, en de daders mogen na voorarrest naar huis met een taakstrafje.
Dit is waarom ouders geen vertrouwen meer hebben in de kinderbescherming en de rechterlijke macht. Walgelijk.
https://t.co/FvcxwK26Wm
With Tulsi Gabbard's new revelations about US bio labs in many countries around the world including Ukraine, it's fascinating recall the bizarre series of events that gave rise to this controversy in the first place:
In May of 2022, some of us began asking whether the US had bio labs in Ukraine, what they were for, and why the US had them there. For asking those questions, we were instantly branded as "pro-Russian conspiracy theorists" in official Ukrainian intel reports, on our Wikipedia pages, by countless media outlets, etc. This was and remains one of the most bizarre episodes I've ever seen.
Before May 2022, when we asked those questions, barely anyone had ever thought about let alone asked about "bio weapons in Ukraine"! I certainly hadn't. Like most people, I had never mentioned a word about it because it had never occurred to me we had them there.
But then, Marco Rubio summoned Victoria Nuland to the Senate and asked her in a televised hearing under oath about these "rumors," clearly expecting her to immediately debunk them as obvious Kremlin lies and to proclaim the US had no such bio labs in Ukraine.
Instead, Nuland did the opposite! She *confirmed* key aspects of these "rumors," and she explicitly warned that the US has several "bio research labs" in Ukraine that are so dangerous that they must not be allowed to fall into Russia's hands.
When some of us heard Nuland's rather shocking admission -- the first-ever disclosure about these labs -- we of course asked: wait! what? Why does the US have bio labs in Ukraine, and what are the US and Ukraine doing in those labs that make them (in Nuland's eyes) so dangerous?? (Note: nobody ever suggested that the presence of these bio labs in Ukraine justified the Russian invasion; we just wanted answers about these US bio labs that Nuland had casually divulged).
We never got real answers. We got smear campaigns. To this day, our names are formally attached to claims that we spread "conspiracy theories" for asking about these labs even though it was Victoria Nuland herself who was the one who accidentally revealed them for the first time in a Senate hearing in response to a shocked Marco Rubio. They then quickly tried shutting down any questioning by pretending that Nuland never said this, and it was just a bunch of paid Kremlin mouthpieces who were spreading lies.
You see the same tactics now being against Tulsi for releasing this new intelligence report. Watch the Nuland testimony in question: