Hello Hacks at @mediaite. I was talking about Mark Levin as the clip makes clear. Also since you’re interested, Ben is clearly paying for views on his show - that’s why he has almost no comments on his main show videos. Everyone in the industry knows this. https://t.co/oM7JjiWN12
You may not like Tucker, what he says and how he says it, but this time he’s asking very important questions. @SteveKrak is correct— watch the whole thing before you weigh in:
It's hard to know how many people on here are trying to manufacture a false narrative about Tucker Carlson's New York Times interview vs. simply suffer from a form of Tucker Derangement Syndrome.
Either way there seems to be an effort to avoid - and encourage others to avoid - the whole 90 minute interview in favor of random out-of-context clips... a willful ignorance machine.
But it's part of the X bubble. Tucker is brilliant, compelling, and one of the most influential forces in media. You don't have to agree with all - or even most - of what he says to see that clearly:
https://t.co/hA1BcObtrz
.@MegynKelly: "My prayer every night is he will get back on track, he will reconnect with the agenda we put him in office to enact, and that the country, or at least those of us who are on what I call 'Team Sanity,' can come back together... His legacy is on the line."
FULL: https://t.co/rCCZHWpd4S
@jaketapper So the suggestion that Israel helped to push us into this war is now a conspiracy theory? Wow, no wonder you missed Biden’s mental decline in such dramatic fashion @jaketapper.
Can’t wait for the next mea culpa book tour.
Megan Rapinoe would NEVER allow herself to get used by a president-- NEVER! Especially one cracking bad jokes about the opposite sex. Receipts courtesy of @megynkelly
Charlie Kirk, in June of 2025, explaining why a massive US war against Iran, and an attempt to facilitate regime change, as pushed by people like Lindsey Graham, is "pathologically insane":
.@TuckerCarlson on why there's a massive backlash to speaking out against Israeli policy on Iran:
"The reason was to prevent criticism of policy goals. Israel wants to use the U.S. military and U.S. treasury to sweep aside the last remaining obstacle to regional hegemony in the Middle East, which is Iran."
.@MegynKelly: "The political left is CRAZY. They are incapable of celebrating a great moment brought to us by white, young, men. They need to hate these guys. People have really lost their minds..."
FULL: https://t.co/iBEWW51PuY
NEW: Since yesterday's deadly shooting in MN, I've talked to more than half a dozen federal sources involved immigration enforcement, including several in senior positions, who all tell me they have grown increasingly uneasy & frustrated w/ some of the claims & narratives DHS pushed in the aftermath of the shooting.
Specifically, I'm told there is extreme frustration with DHS officials going on TV and putting out statements claiming that Alex Pretti was intending to conduct a "massacre" of federal agents or wanted to carry out "maximum damage", even after numerous videos appeared to show those claims were inaccurate. While they say it was a terrible decision to show up with a gun and inject himself into a federal law enforcement operation, there is no indication Pretti was there to murder law enforcement, as videos appear to show he never drew his holstered firearm.
These sources say this messaging from DHS officials has been catastrophic from a PR and morale perspective, as it is eroding trust and credibility - comparing it to when Democrats falsely claimed the border was closed or that Haitians were being whipped at the border.
Some of these sources have described DHS’ response to the shooting as “a case study on how not to do crisis PR”, one said they are so “fed up” that they wish they could retire, another said “DHS is making the situation worse”, and another added that “DHS is wrong” and “we are losing this war, we are losing the base and the narrative."
These sources all believe this is going to end up being what they call a “bad shoot”, a “shitty” situation that happened in seconds where agents likely heard “gun!”, then the disarmed firearm may have had an accidental discharge that spooked the agents, and they shot. The agents do not have the luxury of multiple slow motion angles - and had to make split second decisions.
All of the sources support the mass deportation agenda, but have serious hesitations about the way it is being carried out and the messaging that comes with it. Many of the sources have expressed frustration that ICE is routinely blamed for the actions of Border Patrol, a completely separate agency.
I reached out to DHS for comment on concerns that their rhetoric and comments have damaged their credibility.
DHS provided the following statement to @FoxNews:
“We have seen a highly coordinated campaign of violence against our law enforcement. This individual committed a federal crime while armed as he obstructed an active law enforcement operation. As with any situation that is evolving, we work to give swift, accurate information to the American people as more information becomes available."