It’s finally time. Vibio is live! 🥳
👉 https://t.co/tX96QNAeiM
AI code reviewers are powerful, but they are opinionated. They hallucinate. They miss real issues. Static tools are deterministic, but rigid and noisy.
Vibio combines both the right way.
We run 50+ deterministic security checks against your live URL or GitHub repo to detect real vulnerabilities. No guessing. No vibes. Just reproducible signals.
Then AI validates and explains the findings, adding context without inventing problems.
This hybrid approach means Vibio catches more real vulnerabilities than LLM-only reviewers and more meaningful issues than static-only tools.
In a world of solo builders and fast shipping, security cannot be an afterthought.
I built Vibio for myself. As a solo founder, I assumed most things were probably fine. They were not.
The first scans caught more than I realised I had exposed. That is when I knew this needed to exist.
If you ship fast, Vibio helps you ship safely.
stop calling professional work “vibe-coding.”
“Vibe coders” are the people who don’t look at the code. and even if they do, they have no idea what they’re seeing.
When a pro does it, it’s called something else: AI-assisted coding.
Let’s not mix those two worlds.
Hey @jam_io_dev, I just roasted your project 'Vibio — Find Security Vulnerabilities in Your App.' on https://t.co/8UoJ2XFVac 🔥
Very interesting product here!
Let me know if the feedback was valuable!
Day 5 of updates since https://t.co/tX96QNAeiM launched:
>> 22 total sign ups 🥳 (+1)
>> 4 paying customers (one time payments) 💸 (+0)
>> 150 scans run 💻 (+30)
Yesterday was a lot slower, but I learned a lot. Had some really good feedback from both X & Reddit. Here's what I fixed:
>> After much feedback, the free scan now shows a more in depth break down. It shows total number of issues, and in their categories. The main scan still provides a lot more analysis, but this should give the user more initial feedback.
>> I built a new script with a feedback loop. It runs weekly, going through my DB to find all the false positives OR new findings. It then generates me a list of candidates to improve the scanner. Really excited by this.
Plan for today:
>> Fix a couple more bugs.
>> Do more marketing (try and pick up from yesterday!).
@Stefan162006 You have to keep learning from your mistakes. If you are on project 3 and still doing the same shit you messed up in project 1, then you are the problem
What's crucial for monetizing your product?
Fast and honest Feedback!
So far, it was a bottleneck - but not anymore!🔥
Get feedback from other indie hackers which are on the same journey as yours!
The rules are simple: Roast for Roast!
Check it out and get your product roasted!
https://t.co/H0Uk94fQuj
Day 4 of updates since https://t.co/tX96QNAeiM launched:
>> 21 total sign ups 🥳 (+3)
>> 4 paying customers (one time payments)💸 (+2)
>> 120 scans run 💻 (+32)
After some feedback from users & checking the data I have made 2 crucial fixes since yesterday:
1. Fixed an issue with a false positive. This is now a lot more defined and shouldn't cause any issues.
2. A mobile UI bug when the scan is running. I took this opportunity to completely refactor & restyle the scanning UI. It's a lot cleaner now!
@real_rehaan Could explain the inflated time spend on the dashboard:
Bug on sign up taking a while => People click away => login/sign up happens in background in a separate tab => people close tab