š„šØBREAKING: Myron Gaines went off on Muslims praying in Times Square New York.
Gaines: āTheyāre shutting down Times Square and praying with loud speakers to assert fvcking dominance! And to let people know that āweāre comingāā
U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright demolishes Net Zero. š„
"Let's just engage with reality. Oil, gas, and coal are what run the world. Full stop."
"We can't make a wind turbine, or a solar panel, or a nuclear power plant, without massive amounts of oil, gas, and coal."
"That's how the world works."
This is the most jaw-dropping 4 minutes and 21 seconds you will watch this year.
Nicole Shanahan ā ex-wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin, former running mate of RFK Jr., and someone who personally signed nine-figure philanthropy checks ā just went full whistleblower on the entire Silicon Valley ātech wife mafiaā and how they were used.
Her exact words (full clip attached):
āI donāt think many of the tech mafia wives realize⦠they were used to set the groundwork for what Klaus Schwab calls The Great Reset.
Their money especially was being conscripted through a network of NGO advisors, Hollywood, Davos, and their own companies.
A really small group of people⦠completely blind to how their groundwork is being used to enable these Great Reset policies.ā
Then she turns the knife inward:
āThese women find their meaning through philanthropic work. I really believed I was helping Black communities and indigenous communities rise up.
But now the problems have gotten worse. Crime worse. Mental health worse. The whole model is broken.
At the end of the day they always go: āBut climate change.ā
Social justice + climate change ā it gets progressive women 100% of the time.ā
She even says many now believe the biggest āclimate change issuesā are actually geoengineering issues.
This isnāt some random podcast bro.
This is a woman who lived in the mansions, sat on the boards, flew private to Davos parties⦠and is now saying:
āWe were the useful idiots.ā
Watch the full unedited 4:21 below. Sound on.
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay Ā£59.ć
So, thatās what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem.
āSince you are all such good customers,ā he said, āIām going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by Ā£20.ā
Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free but what about the other six men?
The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realized that Ā£20 divided by six is Ā£3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybodyās share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.ć
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each manās bill by a higher percentage.
They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving).
The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving).
The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving).
The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving).
The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving).
And the tenth man now paid Ā£49 instead of Ā£59 (a 16% saving).ć
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.ć
But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. āI only got Ā£1 out of the Ā£20 saving,ā declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, ābut he got Ā£10!āć
āYeah, thatās right,ā exclaimed the fifth man. āI only saved a Ā£1 too. Itās unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!āć
āThatās true!ā shouted the seventh man. āWhy should he get Ā£10 back, when I only got Ā£2? The wealthy get all the breaks!āć
āWait a minute,ā yelled the first four men in unison, āwe didnāt get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!ā
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.ć
The next week the tenth man didnāt show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.
But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important ā they didnāt have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!ć
And thatās how it works.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.ć
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
šØRUPERT LOWE GOES TO WAR WITH LEFT WING MP'S ON IMMIGRATION
"I DON'T CARE!"
They try to shout him down he keeps on going
"WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE TO NOT BE RAPED STABBED OR KILLED BY FOREIGNERS WHO SHOULD NOT BE HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!?"
The UK is finished
UK Resident āI now have a criminal record because I wrote in the Critic magazine that my stalker was a man. Because he is a man. But the police said that misgendering him was contrary to the Online Safety Act because it was spreading false informationā
A criminal record for misgenderingā¦.
Iām turning 41, but I donāt feel like celebrating.
Our generation is running out of time to save the free Internet built for us by our fathers.
What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control.
Once-free countries are introducing dystopian measures such as digital IDs (UK), online age checks (Australia), and mass scanning of private messages (EU).
Germany is persecuting anyone who dares to criticize officials on the Internet. The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. France is criminally investigating tech leaders who defend freedom and privacy.
A dark, dystopian world is approaching fast ā while weāre asleep. Our generation risks going down in history as the last one that had freedoms ā and allowed them to be taken away.
Weāve been fed a lie.
Weāve been made to believe that the greatest fight of our generation is to destroy everything our forefathers left us: tradition, privacy, sovereignty, the free market, and free speech.
By betraying the legacy of our ancestors, weāve set ourselves on a path toward self-destruction ā moral, intellectual, economic, and ultimately biological.
So no, Iām not going to celebrate today. Iām running out of time. WE are running out of time.
šØKEIR STARMER JUST ADMITTED DIGITAL I.D WILL BE USED TO MAKE PAYMENTS AND ACCESS MONEY
We are turning into a communist state
He's just said the quiet bit out loud
THIS MUST BE STOPPED
Digital ID was the FIRST step the China took.
Itās the FOUNDATION of their SOCIAL CREDIT system now adopted by the west.
It is a surveillance state where one āmistakeā can cost your job, bank account, your family and your freedom.
Reject it totally!
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
The people going around calling everybody 'Nazis' now were advocating forced medical procedures, mass censorship, discrimination, segregation, job termination, healthcare denial, making people show their papers everywhere, and even putting them in camps, just 3-4 years ago.
Never forget.
Hold onto your hats, because Elon MuskāTrumpās go-to advisor, billionaire genius, and hands-down the most influential guy on the planetājust lobbed a grenade into the global conversation.
Heās claiming, loud and clear, that the U.S. government didnāt just botch the COVID-19 responseāthey bankrolled its very existence, setting off a chain reaction that left millions dead worldwide.
This isnāt some late-night rant from a nobody; itās Musk, the guy whoās got the Presidentās ear and a track record of shaking up reality, from Tesla to SpaceX.
Think about it: if heās right, this is beyond explosiveāitās apocalyptic. The idea that D.C. suits funded a virus that flipped the world upside down should have us all hitting the brakes, jaws dropped, demanding the truth.
Weāre talking millions of graves, shattered economies, and endless grief, all potentially tracing back to a government lab checkbook. This isnāt just big news; itās the kind of history-bending bombshell that should make Watergate look like a petty prank.
So why isnāt the planet frozen, reeling from the weight of it? Why arenāt we storming the streets, pounding on doors, screaming for accountability? Muskās dropped the matchāshouldnāt the world be catching fire?
Join me in earning points for the ~200 million $S airdrop on @SonicLabs, the future of DeFi.
Use referral code 1TYXYC at https://t.co/n315dqH6Cm to get started!