@MarkWarner The Democrat Party has now usurped Art I, Sec IV, Cls I, and have stead themselves over the State of Maine and will prevent a lawfully elected candidate for Senate. Because the Compact IAW U. S. Constitution does not apply to Democrat Party. What say you?
@HouseDemocrats The Democrat Party has now usurped Art I, Sec IV, Cls I, and have stead themselves over the State of Maine and will prevent a lawfully elected candidate for Senate. Because the Compact IAW U. S. Constitution does not apply to Democrat Party. What say you?
@SenWarren The Democrat Party has now usurped Art I, Sec IV, Cls I, and have stead themselves over the State of Maine and will prevent a lawfully elected candidate for Senate. Because the Compact IAW U. S. Constitution does not apply to Democrat Party. What say you?
@SenAdamSchiff The Democrat Party has now usurped Art I, Sec IV, Cls I, and have stead themselves over the State of Maine and will prevent a lawfully elected candidate for Senate. Because the Compact IAW U. S. Constitution does not apply to Democrat Party. What say you?
@SenSchumer The Democrat Party has now usurped Art I, Sec IV, Cls I, and have stead themselves over the State of Maine and will prevent a lawfully elected candidate for Senate. Because the Compact IAW U. S. Constitution does not apply to Democrat Party. What say you?
@GovPritzker The reason the Democrat Party doesnโt want to get on board with the Save America Act, is because they wonโt be able to high jack an election already decided upon by the people. Who says thereโs no politburo in our elections process. What say you?
@SenWarren When I see a Senator wear a โRed Coatโ, at a rally to get a candidate from another state elected. And that candidate advocates that we who govern shall be denied Art IV, Sec IV. And cheer we now need a politburo! โWhere have all the flowers gone.โ What say you?
@ElissaSlotkin The blame game is getting lame ๐. Come up with a viable alternative. Not some cockamamie scheme to tax subjugate Americans to be the biatches for the rest of the world. ๐ What say you?
@ChrisMurphyCT That amounts to 3.15 trillion dollars per work week for every American citizen, 163.8 Trillion per year. So what youโre advocating is Shangri-La; money for nothing and the rest is free. Da-wha! What say you?
@RepJasonCrow Nothing says caring like The Democrat Party trying to convince Americans to usurp The U. S. Constitution, so The Communist, Socialist, and Democrat parties can null and void our Republican form of government. What say you?
@RepJerryNadler The Democrat Party is embracing and at the same time embarrassing America, by attempting to install The Communist and Socialist Parties that prevent the guarantee of a Republican Form of Government! What say you?
@ChrisCuomo If the Democrat Party can no longer deliver candidates, whom are America First Last and Always. They need to step aside and let Political Parties that can. What say you?
@JessicaTarlov The reason why communism and socialism will never reside in America is because of U. S. Constitution Art IV, Sec IV, and one and one alone Supreme Law of The Land, Art VI, Sec II. What say you?
@SenRandPaul One of the most important responsibilities of The Senate is to make absolutely sure what the qualifications of Justices are. They are U. S. Constitutionality knowledgeable. They are required to explain Amendment I, 2, 16, 19, and Art III. What say you?
@POTUS IAW Art III, @USSupremeCourt has erred in regards to right of born, citizens of another country are โsubjectsโ and are required to petition for redress. Subjects must come before SCOTUS and make their case for lack of jurisdiction IAW Amendment XIV. What say you?
@SenRandPaul@KatrinaPierson One of the biggest lies perpetrated on the American people is that right of born is easy as making vacation plans as a โsubjectโ of another country to birth your child in U. S. A., and invoke right of born. @SCOTUS has erred I. A. W. Art III, subjects must petition. What say you?
@AGCHanaway@realJennaEllis IAW Art III, @USSupremeCourt has erred in regards to right of born, citizens of another country are โsubjectsโ and are required to petition for redress. Subjects must come before SCOTUS and make their case for lack of jurisdiction IAW Amendment XIV. What say you?