james stefan

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propwatchmedia @TradingLucid @TrustedPropHub i also has same problem with lucid review for 1 month and then reject

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH LUCID TRADING KYC?

I kept seeing traders report the same issue, so I decided to test it myself.

And now my account is showing the exact same “Account Under Review” screen with Lucid saying inconsistencies were found and that the decision is final, with no appeal or further review.

The frustrating part? Traders are reporting different versions of the same problem: some allegedly see this before completing KYC, others are stuck under review for days, while existing traders are now worried about what happens when they eventually reach payout/KYC.

No clear explanation. No meaningful update. No timeline.

Trading days are being wasted, accounts are inaccessible, and traders are left guessing whether their account will actually make it through verification.

@TradingLucid @ajtradinglucid traders deserve answers.

If this is a genuine verification issue, explain it clearly.If there’s a system problem, acknowledge it.
But silence while traders sit locked out is not accountability.

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 ANOTHER $13K+ PAID OUT AT GFT 🐐

This is the kind of payout transparency traders want to see.

Respect to @GoatFunded for continuing to put actual trader rewards front and centre. 🫡

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propwatchmedia @GoatFunded goat is 🐐

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propwatchmedia @Pipstonecapital pipstone always pays off

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 PIPSTONE CAPITAL IS PAYING.

From $7,900+ to $3,700 in weekly rewards - real traders, real numbers, real payouts.

This is the kind of transparency the prop community wants to see.

Big respect to @Pipstonecapital for consistently showcasing trader rewards.

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propwatchmedia @AquaFunded 💙💙

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 AQUAFUNDED JUST DROPPED 3 NEW ADD-ONS

AquaFunded⁠ is adding some serious flexibility for traders:

✅On-Demand Lifetime Rewards
✅ 7-Day Lifetime Rewards
✅ 100% Lifetime Profit Split

Another new addon coming soon.

AquaFunded is clearly expanding the options available to traders and these new addons are definitely worth watching.

@AquaFunded @LewisAquaFunded 🔥

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

🎊Congratulations to our giveaway winners

After reviewing entries from our Discord community, we are pleased to announce the following winners:
@amnaqayyum56

@AnwarUl07405664

@zeroonstake

@marketing_90505

@james_stefan384

Thank you to everyone who participated and stayed engaged with the community.

This giveaway was a small way to recognize that support.

To the winners: we wish you continued growth and success. Keep building, stay consistent, and we look forward to seeing you progress toward the payout stage.

To the rest of the community:
the journey is still open.
Stay active, keep contributing, and aim for the next milestone with us.

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@PropFirmsGuru @amnaqayyum56 @AnwarUl07405664 @zeroonstake @marketing_90505 thank you for the opportunity ☺️

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propwatchmedia please make smooth kyc process

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 BREAKING: LUCID TRADING’S KYC ISSUE NEEDS ANSWERS

A growing number of traders are reporting issues with Lucid Trading’s KYC process.

Some claim their verification is denied before they can even complete KYC, while others have submitted all required documents and remain stuck on “Under Review” for several days.

The impact is straightforward: traders are losing valuable trading days while waiting for account access.

This isn’t about one isolated complaint anymore. The repeated reports around KYC delays, early denials and prolonged reviews deserve a clear explanation.

@TradingLucid @ajtradinglucid , what’s happening with the verification process, and what timeline should affected traders expect?

Traders need clarity, access and transparency.
Not days of uncertainty.

[Prop Firms Update @propfirmsupdate]

GIVEAWAY: 12 x $5K accounts

To enter:

1️⃣ Follow
@propfirmsupdate
@Ye_FTM
@ftmarketslive
@FTMAsiaHQ

2️⃣ Like ❤️ & Repost 🔁 this tweet

3️⃣ Tag 3 trader friends 👥

4️⃣ Join Discord 👇
https://t.co/gG25xrdnl4

5️⃣ Reply with screenshots proving every step is complete 📸

Complete every step or you won’t be eligible.

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propfirmsupdate @GuardianFutures if proven hedge then not approved is okay

[Prop Firms Update @propfirmsupdate]

🚨 $10K Payout Rejected – @GuardianFutures

This trader $10,000 payout was rejected and five $50K Reserve accounts were breached for alleged hedging.

But the proof provided reportedly shows trades from five OLD evaluation accounts from August 3.

Those accounts are NOT the accounts connected to the rejected payout.

The trader started trading the rejected accounts on September 2 and had already received a separate $10K payout from Blue Guardian on August 18 using different accounts.

@seanbaint – review this case & pay him as soon as possible.

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@propfirmsupdate @EquityEdgeUK @P_AreaScatter please solve this

[Prop Firms Update @propfirmsupdate]

🚨 $4.2K Payout Rejected – Trader Requests Evidence

@EquityEdgeUK rejected this trader (@P_AreaScatter) $4,200 Payout after he completed the challenge.

According to the trader:

• Initial reason: "Group Trading"

• He requested the accounts, names and trades involved

• The explanation later reportedly changed to device linkage

• No IPs, hardware IDs, timestamps or logs were reportedly provided

The trader is asking for clear evidence supporting the alleged Violation.

Hey @berkayglife – can you clarify this vase and provide the evidence behind the allegations?

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@PropFirmsGuru @SureLeverage evidence from both sides is needed

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

A trader received a $10,000 2-step account with @SureLeverage passed the evaluation, and was one day away from payout eligibility.

Shortly after, the partnership was cancelled, the accounts were marked breached/invalid, and the conditions changed.

After the trader said this would be made public, the accounts were returned but with new consistency rules that made the account much harder to trade.

$750 payout was later requested and, after back-and-forth, around $350–$380 was received.

This was kept quiet for a long time because it shouldn’t look like a personal attack.

Overall, the firm isn’t bad.
There are traders who have had decent experiences.

What needs to be asked, respectfully, is this:

Why are so many partnerships being terminated with the explanation that engagement or reach isn’t enough?

From what is coming out, that does not appear to be the full story.

This is being looked into further because traders and partners deserve clearer answers.

This isn’t about revenge.
It’s about transparency.
If the firm is willing to address this openly will be appreciated.

Because it the start the firm was already aware of reach and engagement so why sudden termination?.

I know a lot of people who was given a reason of performance but this is not the full story I'm on it with a few other people we will find it out and will address it publicly as well.

This is not a threat it's a fair worry.

[james stefan @james_stefan384]

@PropFirmsGuru @Pipstonecapital smooth instant account model