@BannersOTW@scoobsterville I thought the biggest tell was the calls shortly after. Seemed to take an age to call anything on the Bonner hit and were clearly unsure. Dogs get 2 goals on the PP. Seahawks get a bit of a soft 5 on 3 PP shortly afterwards. Almost as if trying to make up for it, it seemed to me.
...that would require officials being able to admit they could, possibly, maybe have missed something or made a mistake.
*Checks out the window for any pigs flying nearby*
Be interesting to see how this approach evolves over the season. Teams requesting reviews could lead to a bit of one-upsmanship (you got our player banned so we'll try and get yours banned).
The logical route in my opinion would be for officials to suggest reviews instead but...
๐จDecision Review System Outcome: Sunday 13th October
A DRS review was requested by both the Leeds Knights and the Hull Seahawks during their fixture on the 13th October.
๐ https://t.co/jf4yCYO2o3
@BannersOTW Don't the playoffs pretty much fall apart without this?
It's somewhat more enjoyable (or rather considerably less stressful) when you have nothing riding on it.
๐๐๐ what an embarrassing decision this is.
I can't see how anyone can make that decision and give themselves a pat on the back for a job well done.
What's that phrase about "clowns running the circus"...
@roeganlily35 Unless it's been submitted to DOPs to review...and let's face it, they've been a bit of a farce so far this year. But I imagine we'll find out soon enough.
๐ ๐ญ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐ช๐๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐
Day 2 Winner is: Laura Sneed! Drop us an email on [email protected] to claim your prize!
Day 3 is treat!๐ To enter like, share and drop your best Christmas gif in the comments! ๐