James

[Mark Kenny @markgkenny.bsky.social @markgkenny]

Brilliant.

[James @jamisjj]

@FiFimackie No

[James @jamisjj]

@j6371773 Clown-like interpretation imo

[James @jamisjj]

@newbury3186 Might need to be charged with something first?

[Dow @mark_dow]

Trump has won this war 7 times.

He’s negotiated a peace settlement 12 times.

And he’s opened the Strait of Hormuz at least 4 times.

What more do you want from him?

[James @jamisjj]

@MissBaileyWoof @theage @smh If this happened it have been front page news for the days. The double standard exists but not where you think it is.

[James @jamisjj]

@crock1954 @AngusTaylorMP Oh fuck off

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 A relevant consideration

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 Aggravated. Again a pretty basic legal principle.

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 The conduct would be undoubtedly more serious if the other party was harmed.

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 See 4

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 Pretty common legal principle that one’s own experience of disadvantage is a relevant submission with respect to penalty.

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 Your thoughts? Is age irrelevant?

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 Yes it was. In 2024 he used the term multiple times.

[James @jamisjj]

@Denno10_ @JoshJenkins24 Would seem to be a statement of fact/observation, as there have been many cases of this type - not an isolated incident. This is an observation, not a justification.

[James @jamisjj]

@Michael_60 @DavidZita1 Well, yes, the case existing, along with other similar cases, makes the observation true.

[James @jamisjj]

@tadpole7488389 @Michael_60 @DavidZita1 Nor does the observation that it occurs condone it.

[James @jamisjj]

@LMcKirdy7 Doesn’t set any precedent. They’ve upheld the guilty verdict

[James @jamisjj]

@beetgordon_ Did you read the judgment?

[James @jamisjj]

@JoshJenkins24 Which ones? Why?