Ordenamiento urbano sí, pero sin abusos ni atropellos a la propiedad privada.
Estoy a favor de mejorar nuestras aceras, garantizar la accesibilidad universal y construir una ciudad más segura y ordenada. Sin embargo, considero que el Acuerdo Municipal N.º 316 de 2026 debe revisarse en aquellas disposiciones que afectan a viviendas unifamiliares o multifamiliares construidas legalmente, con planos aprobados y permisos otorgados conforme a la normativa vigente en su momento.
Las nuevas exigencias urbanísticas deben aplicarse hacia el futuro, respetando la seguridad jurídica y los derechos legítimamente adquiridos. No es razonable obligar a los propietarios a modificar accesos vehiculares, demoler estructuras autorizadas o sacrificar espacios de sus terrenos privados para ajustarse a disposiciones posteriores, sin una evaluación individual, justificación legal y las garantías correspondientes.
El interés público no puede convertirse en una excusa para imponer cargas desproporcionadas ni para producir expropiaciones de hecho.
La Constitución protege la propiedad privada, el debido proceso y la seguridad jurídica. Ninguna regulación municipal puede desconocer esas garantías.
Por ello, considero necesaria la revisión de los artículos 10, 13, 16, 17, 18 y 53 del Acuerdo, particularmente en cuanto a su aplicación sobre edificaciones preexistentes.
No me opongo al progreso ni a la accesibilidad. Me opongo a la arbitrariedad, a la aplicación retroactiva que lesione derechos adquiridos y a cualquier medida que, bajo la apariencia de ordenamiento urbano, termine afectando injustificadamente el patrimonio de las familias panameñas.
Una ciudad moderna debe garantizar los derechos de todos: de quienes transitan por sus aceras y de quienes han construido sus viviendas cumpliendo la ley.
El desarrollo urbano debe avanzar con respeto a la Constitución, no por encima de ella.
@RITAFABREGA Anja para la invasión vi videos que los soldados tomaban en su mano la hojaldra y la rellenaban con salchichas, la disfrutaban, le metían queso, etc. Que gusto!!
@HectorArielMi@Nanopty Hay supermercados y tiendas que ofrecen aun mas descuentos al jubilados. Y yo les cuento a mis amigascellas orientan a familiares que compren allí, favorecen a los negocios.
@AdrianE26416393@federicoalves Gracias, por acotar las fechas. No sabía las fechas exactas, lo importante es que lo tienen. Gracias. No se enoje. No vale la pena!!
@AldoSterone111 Y si lo hubieran "medicado" para el segundo intento? Esas medicinas que atentan, muchos que tienen volar voluntariamente se toman pastillas y vuelan regios. O no llevarlo de viaje. Peligroso.
It's not the plane that crashed in Florida.
It Was a Missile. The Crater Is Not an Aircraft Crash Signature. The Vertical Drop Is Not Aerodynamic.
The wreckage at #Cresthaven is not what a Learjet looks like when it hits the ground.
An aircraft crash leaves a debris field along a forward trajectory. Wings shear off, the fuselage breaks along stress lines, the tail separates, and the wreckage scatters along the impact vector. The crater is shallow and elongated.
What happened on Military Trail produced a near-vertical plunge and a massive crater with debris thrown over a wide radius. Governor DeSantis said it himself: "like a missile coming down." He was not using a figure of speech. He was describing the physical signature.
The flight profile is the proof.
The Learjet went from 35,000 feet to the ground in 76 seconds. Vertical speed exceeded 32,000 feet per minute. No Learjet 60 does that under pilot control. No Learjet 60 does that from a weather encounter. An overspeed dive of that rate requires the tail to be gone or the flight controls to be severed.
That is what a proximity-fused warhead does. It does not need a direct hit. A detonation near the empennage shreds the horizontal stabiliser and the elevator. The aircraft pitches over instantly. The pilot has no authority left. The nose goes down and stays down.
The battery was inside its engagement envelope when the aircraft entered.
The Avenger systems were on a barge beside Mar-a-Lago and on the south side of Trump International Airport. The Learjet's descent path crossed directly over that second battery. The crew had a target descending into the protected zone at a dive-bombing rate.
The Secret Service called the threat environment "heightened, real, and dynamic." That is the language of a weapons-tight posture. A crew that has been told the threat is real does not wait to identify a fast-moving target in degraded weather. It engages.
The evidence that was removed is the evidence that would settle it.
The flight-tracking and radar data for the Learjet disappeared from public tracking services within minutes. That is not a technical glitch. Tracking data does not vanish from multiple independent services simultaneously unless someone removes it.
That data would show the transponder's last returns, the exact descent vector, and whether a NORAD radar track terminated at the same moment a launch was detected. It is gone. The NTSB is reconstructing the path from the wreckage. The digital record is sealed.
The timing is the file nobody will open.
Trump left Mar-a-Lago on Air Force One at 11:55 a.m. The aircraft went down at 12:50 p.m. Fifty-five minutes. The President was airborne. The air defence batteries were still deployed. The protection envelope was still active. The threat assessment was still live.
Whoever was at that battery had no way of knowing the President had cleared the area. The posture was unchanged. The rules of engagement were unchanged. The gun was pointed at the sky.
What the US government is hiding, named plainly.
It is hiding that an American air defence system fired on a civilian aircraft inside US airspace. It is hiding that the system was deployed because Washington assessed that Iran or the Resistance Axis could strike the President's residence. It is hiding that the response to that assessment killed nine people on a Learjet.
The cover story is weather. The cover story requires the public to believe that a Learjet entered a thunderstorm, lost control, and fell out of the sky at 32,000 feet per minute directly above a live air defence battery protecting the President.
That is not a weather event. That is a firing event with a weather alibi.
The bill.
Nine dead. A crater on Military Trail. Six hundred residents evacuated. Two Avenger batteries on station. Radar data erased. A Governor who described a missile and then let the NTSB call it weather.
The United States deployed missile systems to protect one man and killed nine people on a private jet. The investigation will examine the wreckage. It will not examine the battery. That is the decision that was made before the smoke cleared.
The cover is not a mistake. It is the policy. The missile is the truth. The weather is the alibi.