Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦

Si la moneda que se te acaba de caer es redonda, probablemente sea mía

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@coachingfutbol El partido va a ser pausado porque España va a buscar exactamente eso; será Francia la que le meta muchísimo ritmo cuando recupere el balón, pero que tenga cuidado de no dejar espacios en el medio campo yendo a presionar arriba, que por algo a España todos le aparcan el autobús

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@joshpearson180 Spain hasn't convinced anyone yet, but being astounded they got this far really is a stretch, they haven't conceded anything and they absolutely dominate matches, even if they don't manage to create many good chances

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@FurboChampagnee Entre Unai y Pedri casi me da una embolia

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@GoonzalezzRM ?

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@11hxgo Al contrario que Pedri, Fabián juega a 1 o 2 toques, mucho más fluido en ataque, entra de segunda línea (que España lo necesita como el comer), ataca de manera natural por la izquierda y permite a Lamine recibir en posiciones más ventajosas y parece que se entiende mejor con Olmo

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@UrieelD10S @dia_de_derbi @BetermoAlonso Lo que no entiendes es que España ha concedido 1 ocasión clara en 6 partidos de mundial. ¿Se la han metido? Totalmente, y Unai Simón no inspira ninguna confianza, pero no quita el hecho de que es una selección que concede poquísimo.

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

Es que qué cojones es esto de Pedri, SUELTA EL BALÓN, IMBÉCIL

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@Futbolojos Pero en esas situaciones lo que haces es juegas fácil a uno o dos toques para ir acomodándote en el partido, no ralentizar el juego con conducciones lentas de 5 toques para luego dar un pase que podría haber dado de primeras

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@AlbertFCB Pero si la primera parte de España ha sido la mejor de todo el mundial quitando la paliza a Arabia xd

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@_Yare_Yare_Daze @xGPhilosophy No, XG doesn't account for number of chances, rather how good those chances are. And Spain have shot twice within 5 meters of the goal, which are shots that tend to go in, for whatever reason.

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@Superlend1999 @GxlDePaulinho Pero si Pedri en este mundial no ha dado menos de 4 toques en ninguna jugada y en cuanto ha entrado España ha pasado de ser un equipo fluido con ataque por los dos flancos a jugar totalmente estáticos
No te firma sus actuaciones ni Dani Ceballos

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@_Yare_Yare_Daze @xGPhilosophy Well, if Belgium didn't allow those rebounds, the model wouldn't have accounted for them, right?

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

@SitoFCB Y Pedri podría recordar lo que es un balón de fútbol cuando se pone la camiseta de España, tremendo muertazo

[Gonzi @GoonzalezzRM]

“hacen un desmarque ferran y olmo”

pedri en su mundo paralelo:

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

- Olmo es un escándalo
- Mikel Merino tiene un olfato increíble, y su gol y el de Fabián demuestran que España necesita como el comer a alguien que entre de segunda línea
- El mundial de Pedri te lo firma Dani Ceballos
- A Unai Simón no le contratan en Prosegur, 0 seguridad

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

Pedri es horroroso, QUIERES SOLTAR LA BOLA, COJONES

[Prisionero de Alcatraz🇪🇦 @jardermorder]

¿¿Qué coño hace el calvo quitando a Fabián en el 56?? Si estaba siendo el mejor del medio campo

[Chubby♨️ @kimmonismus]

Today is a dark day for freedom and democracy in Europe. General chat surveillance has been implemented in Brussels. A disgrace.

The so-called Chat Control 1.0 cleared a crucial hurdle in the European Parliament today. This means platforms may once again be allowed to scan private messages, officially on a “voluntary” basis, but in practice this marks the return of indiscriminate monitoring of private communication.

What makes this especially bitter is that a majority of the MEPs who voted were reportedly against it. According to Patrick Breyer, 314 MEPs voted against the regulation, 276 voted in favor and 17 abstained. And yet the rejection failed because it was not enough to have a simple majority of those voting. An absolute majority of all MEPs would have been required.

That is the democratic scandal.

When a majority of those present votes against a proposal and it still passes because a formal threshold is not reached, it does not feel like democratic decision-making to many citizens. It feels like a procedural trick.

And it becomes even more problematic when you look at the context: Chat Control had already been rejected before. Yet the issue was put back on the agenda shortly before the summer break, through an urgent procedure, at a time when absences could become decisive.

This is not just some technical regulation. It goes to the very core of private communication. It is about whether digital messages remain fundamentally private or whether platforms may systematically scan content again, without concrete suspicion, without a court order and without any individual cause.

A free society must not turn private communication into a potential surveillance zone. Anyone who takes digital fundamental rights seriously cannot accept millions of innocent people being placed under general suspicion.

Today, a dangerous signal was sent: fundamental rights can be hollowed out through procedural logic, timing and political tricks. Not through an open, clear and honest majority, but through a system in which absence effectively helps the supporters.

This is a dark day for Europe.

Not because the fight is over, but because today showed how easily digital fundamental rights come under pressure when surveillance logic, symbolic politics and institutional tricks come together.

Anyone who wants a free internet, anyone who wants to protect private communication and anyone who takes democracy seriously should talk about this.

Share this issue. Inform yourself. Look at who voted how. And never forget: freedom rarely disappears all at once. It disappears step by step, often in technical details, often in complicated procedures and often exactly when too few people are watching.

[Peter Todd @peterktodd]

Yes, you read that correctly: the majority present voted _against_ chat control.

But due to the absurdly undemocratic, illegal, procedure they're using, it comes into law anyway after being rejected multiple times before in previous votes.

Insane.

[mert @mert]

mass surveillance is coming

> first 5 votes fail
> have another vote
> invoke technicality to require majority to vote AGAINST rather than requiring majority to vote FOR
> do it when everyone's on vacation so not enough numbers to vote against

demonic creatures